2/ this is a smart move. regardless of what management thinks of unions, there are two kinds of digital media companies these days when it comes to union drives. 1) those who recognize their unions more or less voluntarily and end up with a union and 2) those which ...
3/ fight by every possible means to avoid being unionized and incur all manner of brand damage and workroom acrimony and then also end up with a union. It's different in other industries. But anyone who doesn't see this hasn't watched the industry for the last five or ...
4/ six years. A few times over the last two or three years some outlet has a unionization drive and in cases where there's a name founder the founder freaks and then some mutual friend puts them in touch with me. I take a little pride in the fact that I've played a small ...
5/ role in avoiding needless acrimony for some other orgs. My message is almost always twofold. First, it's not as bad as you're worried it might be and you'll probably end up with a more stable workplace. Second, immediately recognize the union ...
6/ without any conditions. There are good ethical reasons to do this. If a majority of employees decide to unionize that's their legal right. But whether you like that or not you're going to lose your pitched battle to stop it if you're considering that. In our case when ...
7/ our union first contacted me they said the staff was unanimous. So that settled it. There was nothing to negotiate. They'd made their decision. With corporate outfits it's a very different calculus. But when it's an individual owner or founder these people ...
8/ often need some hand-holding or reassurance not to self-sabotage. So hey, I may have counseled your boss to recognize your union! Appreciate the congrats!!!!!!!!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There's a part of this story that doesn't get enough attn. It's presented as a dispute abt science. But that's not exactly true. There's quite a lot of evidence that boosters provide additional protection against COVID infection. nytimes.com/2021/10/25/hea…
2/ Quite possibly a dramatic increase in protection against infection. The more operative question is whether that additional protection is evanescent or more durable. One theory is that the original dosing regimen was simply not optimal. You do much better if you have one ...
3/ dose and then wait a significant amount of time for the second. In any case, the clinicians and epis who have misgivings make the argument that we shouldn't be using the vaccine to prevent COVID cases that don't land people in the hospital. But a lot of individuals ...
2/ Another issue which I don’t address in this piece is the issue of promised pardons. That’s probably the most interesting and newiest part of the article. But again, people are misunderstanding it. I’ve seen many here interpreting this as promised pardons for the bad acts …
3/ the insurrectionists were about to commit as part of storming the capitol. That’s clearly not what it says. It refers to people who were already in legal jeopardy for other things being promised pardons for participating in the insurrection. I think we know what ….
Many more details in this LAT piece. Many of which are terrifying to hear if you're anyone with liability for what was happening on this set. But the description of events sounds somewhat different here. latimes.com/entertainment-…
2/ As a non-movie person I'd been assuming this was during the filming of a scene. But the reference here to an accidental discharge seems less a matter of an accidental firing of a real bullet than the gun firing between scenes. This cld perhaps explain why the DP & Director ...
3/ were near enough to the weapon to both be injured from a single firing of the weapon.
Few more points on this. I know everyone is dunking on him. But I feel profound sympathy for Baldwin. This is an unimaginable nightmare. But piecing together the various facts I discuss in the thread below it appears that this was a bit of a DIY, low budget production set.
2/ Says here there was no union propmaster/armorer involved. Just a local hire. Curious what movie people say about this. But I don't think this is like you had some non-union construction guys building your house. My impression is that all the people who are prop/armorers ...
3/ in movie work are union. So saying the folks doing that weren't union sounds like they didn't really have someone on set who does this professionally. As noted in the thread, producer friend of mine tells me that most major production sets don't use actual firearms anymore ...
Tragedy on the set of Rust reminds me of the decades old story of Jon-Erik Hexum, young rising star actor who as a joke put a prop gun to his head on set and fired the trigger not realizing that a "blank" if it's fired in direct contact with your head has a forceful enough ...
2/ discharge to kill you if you put it to your temple. He died. Young handsome guy in his 20s. This was like in the mid-80s. I've been wanting to ask: has there been any reporting of what set of facts possibly led to Baldwin fatally injuring one person and seriously injuring ...
3/ another? Were live bullets in the prop gun? I honestly don't know if that's possible. If it is what makes it different from a gun? why not just use a gun with blanks? This isn't a leading question: are there any details on this?
obviously she’s not the only one supporting these things. but all of them together really is basically the economic agenda of dc lobbyists, private equity and VC world. It’s what you come up with if you give each lobbyists a shopping list to fill out at donor events
like again, it’s not that she’s unique precisely. but basically this is a list you come to only if you have no policy views and you have the donors text their asks while your on the phone to the White House. She doesn’t even go through the motions
3/ I mean, carried interest. Lol. According to IRS regs you’re not even allowed to know what carried interest means unless you make more than $2m a year in taxable income.