If someone says they won't sleep with a specific Jewish person, that's perfectly fine. If they don't go out of the way to say anything, that's fine too.
If they explicitly say they won't date *any* Jewish person, yeah, I've got questions.
Now in truth, people are allowed to have their preferences, even if those are not immune from judgement. Most people don't go out of their way to say they wouldn't date a Jewish person. I don't think we should go around checking what's inside people's hearts either.
To go around explicitly stating, in public, that you wouldn't date a person of X identity invites public judgment. Don't misunderstand, that's okay in most cases. It all depends on what society and those around you judge.
I do think it's worth a person reflecting on.
FYI the original context was about trans folks. I don't want to encourage or deal with that conversation on my TL, so I'm using the example he gave. I apply the same reasoning to all "interracial" dating.
I'll include the original thread for context. Please do *not* follow it to go bother Jesse via my comment. Please do *not* take any of this as an invitation to be transphobic on my TL. I have a sharp block finger for transphobia.
Depending on your level in chess, you can look at a position and just have no idea what the right move is and why. All while it's just obvious to a stronger player.
Share my misery. White to move. Can you find the right idea and why?
I'll post the right answer in a bit. It's so subtle, but so clear once you see it. It's the fact that I didn't see it right away that's so frustrating.
There's nothing tactical, and that's how we often approach puzzles. The key is 1. b4, preventing black from taking the c5 pawn with a piece. After 1...bxc5, white plays 2. b5! and black is left with weak doubled pawns.
Organizations put in place DEI for multiple reasons. It makes sense for all sorts of HR, legal, and PR reasons.
But, controversially, it also makes sense because those who oppose them to the point of quitting, are people these companies would happily see replaced.
Companies have values that they promote through policies. Y'all don't really believe every Walmart greeter wants to smile at everyone, or every call center work wants to tell everyone to have a good day.
Malcolm X has a famous quote about a black man with a PhD. That quote hit the hardest when I realized there were people I dealt with on Twitter who believed black folks with a PhD was to be assumed less intelligent than white folks with the same PhD in the same field.
One of the benefits of accepting CRT's tenet that racism is "ordinary" is that you don't get too worked up about seeing that racism, or even thinking people malicious for believing it.
Still, racism can shock you sometimes, and that's not fun.
I still believe education is one of the primary tools we have for fighting white supremacy. Unfortunately education isn't a panacea, and we will have to push through even as we gain more education. We will have to rework the tools that have restrained us.
It's trivially true that being bullied has a non-zero heritability estimate.
Yet I think there's a lot wrong in suggesting that a person's genes *cause* them to be bullied.
The actions of others should not to be attributed to being caused by your genes.
I think this comes down to the definition of the word cause by the way, and unsurprisingly, there is no consensus on what it means to cause (ask the philosophers).
We all have some of our own intuitions as to what we envision when we think of cause though.
If having genes that make you wear glasses can be said to *cause* bullying, then don't our genes cause us to be raped, murdered, or face racism?
I don't know how we can draw the line without it seeming arbitrary. That may be why the word cause is itself so fraught. Tough one.
A white professor insisting he has the right to use the n-word to his black students and they shouldn't be complaining is probably a lot worse than the white moderates MLK was complaining about.
But of course he faces no real consequences.
Always interesting who these Cancel Culture Warriors tend to choose as their great examples of the horrors of "cancel culture".
Fighting for the rights of white men to say the n-word without complaint.