what makes living within a peer-to-peer mass surveillance society difficult is that the rules and norms we are expected to follow are constantly changing. What is permitted today, may not be tomorrow, and so even past actions can be the seeds of a future downfall.
The rules, norms, and values we are expected to follow are not an emergent and spontaneous by-product of the interactions of social media users, but are being shaped to align with the interests of certain corporations, governments and other powerful global institutions.
By manipulating what we see and what we don’t see, and the frequency with which we see things, tech companies can effectively influence what we believe and what we value.
The more time we spend glued to our screens, scrolling through these manipulated and censored social media feeds, the more we run the risk of becoming mere automatons serving the interests of a small group of elitists whose ultimate goal is to control and exploit us.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Goldstein (NON-GMO human)

Goldstein (NON-GMO human) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MrGoldstein7

2 Nov
Noam Chomsky is and always has been A SPOOK
🧵🧵👇👇👇👇

The first red flag we find in Chomsky's Wikipedia bio is that he was appointed to Harvard's Society of Fellows in 1951, at age 22. Image
This is a strange society; in that you don't have to be going to Harvard or even planning to go to Harvard to be nominated or appointed. Chomsky never went to Harvard, getting all his degrees from the University of Pennsylvania.
You will tell me Chomsky was physically on Harvard campus for three years during his fellowship, but he had absolutely no requirements while there. That should look highly suspicious to you. Image
Read 356 tweets
31 Oct
Identification with the cause becomes so central and primary that, strangely enough, one prefers news that the problem is really as bad as one fears it is – since this affirms the value of the cause, and thereby of one’s identification with it.
If climate change or civil rights should turn out to be no longer an issue, the identity of those identifying with these causes would be undermined and deflated.
One’s profile–built and maintained with sometimes a lifetime of effort, and in which one is thus deeply invested–would lose its social validity and become obsolete.
Read 4 tweets
25 Oct
In 2014 George Fitzgerald Smoot III decided to go on TEDx and make an absolute fool of himself. Don't take my word for it, but actually watch the lecture. It is under 20 minutes. . . of nothing.
He doesn't get near proving anything, except possibly that he is on the wrong meds. He actually manages to get sunscreen in his eyes during an indoor lecture in northern England in the middle of winter.
You will say he is just addled from old age, but he is still in his sixties there.
Read 36 tweets
23 Oct
On October 1, aces and eights, Chai, an Austin judge allegedly made a default judgment against Alex Jones in the lawsuit allegedly filed against him by parents of Sandy Hook victims. On October 18, aces and eights, Alex Jones published a reply on his own site.
In case you don't know, a default judgment is a finding for the plaintiff without going to trial. It is normally reserved for cases in which the defendant fails to reply or show up to court. That wasn't the case here, since Jones did show up.
Jones has claimed this was a show trial, but it isn't. It is a fake trial, which is different. A show trial would be a real trial used for media, propaganda, or political purposes. But that isn't what this is.
Read 13 tweets
23 Oct
State and Pharma propaganda film "Silver Linings Playbook" came out in 2012 and was nominated for 8 academy awards. Jennifer Lawrence won best actress.
I will now decode the movie for you. As part of that decoding, let us look at its 92% “fresh” score at Rotten Tomatoes. Image
Along with IMDB, Rotten Tomatoes is one of the top online review sites for new movies. So a lot of people base their movie choices on the scores at these places. Like everything else, these scores are rigged.
A large percentage of the “counted” reviews are written by embedded Intelligence agents, so—like the Academy Award nominations—these reviews simply act as promotion by the CIA for their own movies.
Read 45 tweets
23 Oct
The government doesn't want you to think you have the right to feel any real emotions, or, worse, to act on them. If you feel mad or sad or even happy, they want you to think you have gone mental. They want you to believe the only sane response to the world is a flat acceptance.
Even a shrug of the shoulders is suspect, because it indicates you may be hiding your true feelings. You aren't allowed any true feelings.
That is what "bi-polar" is telling you .... They are trying to sell you the idea that mood swings are unnatural. Just as they have labeled kids' natural energy as ADHD, they have labeled adults' natural moods as bi-polar. People ... have mood swings...
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(