With control over trillions of dollars and America's foreign policy at stake, why WOULDN'T a party steal an election when they know the corporate press won't cover it - actually, will censor all discussion of it - even if they get caught?
Everyone knows political operators are not constrained by ethical considerations. Our elections are absurdly insecure, The only thing ever preventing stolen elections was the difficulty of pulling it off without getting caught. But that guardrail was non-existent in 2020.
100s of untested rule changes before election (e.g, lowering signature matching standard). Unprecedented use of mail-in ballots. Chain of custody problems everywhere. Absurd statistical anomalies. 100s of pollwatcher complaints.

Media: Most secure election LITERALLY IN HISTORY.
They literally said that - not just secure, but the MOST secure in history. A patently insane statement. If the media is willing to provide that much cover, there is zero chance of you being called to account - esp when 1/2 of GOP establishment wanted Trump gone.
What, they just value our democracy so much that they wouldn't dare, even when there is no chance of getting caught? Please. Every Democrat politician let the threat of a nationwide post-election riot float out there, not saying a word as cities boarded up for the coming storm.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martyr Made

Martyr Made Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @martyrmade

2 Nov
The 2nd Amendment lives or dies with the AR-15, and defenders shouldn’t run from the “weapon of war” description. The 2nd Amendment means the right of citizens to keep & bear a basic light infantry weapon, or it means nothing at all.
You’re describing the basic strategy of anarcho-tyranny: Allow disorder to spread to shore up support for the security state among regular people even as it’s being mobilized against them.
I’m more worried about the crisis in reading comprehension.
Read 4 tweets
17 Oct
An ICBM goes up and back down w/the trajectory of a cannonball. Hypersonics are guided missiles, travel lower in the atmosphere, and are not as fast (ICBMs travel 15k mph+ in terminal, hypersonics run about Mach 5, not quite 4k mph). 1/x
They present different air defense challenges. The difficult part for ICBMs is their sheer speed, which nearly matched the velocity of the explosion & shrapnel of our defending missiles (meaning we usually need a skin-to-skin hit to guarantee destruction). 2/x
OTOH, we know where they’re going because, well, because they’re ballistic. This limits their tactical use - say, for taking out a carrier group in the Indian Ocean. In the time it took to reach the target, the ships could simply run away and the missile couldn’t follow. 3/x
Read 7 tweets
14 Oct
RussiaGate v1.0

In October 1924, The Daily Mail published a letter purporting to be from Soviet communist leader Grigori Zinoviev. It’s contents were chilling.

1/x
Marked “Very Secret”, it spoke of a “successful rising in the working class districts of England,” and, “it would be desirable to have cells in all the units of troops, and among factories working on munitions .” The story was headlined: Civil War Plot by Socialists’ Masters. 2/x
It was the heat of the UK election season, and Winston Churchill & other conservatives used the letter to put pressure on the incumbent Labour Party, accusing them of sympathy and ties w/a hostile power.

There was only one problem: The letter was a complete fake. 3/x
Read 7 tweets
29 Sep
Schmitt on the proletariat:

“What was new and fascinating in The Communist Manifesto was something else: The systematic concentration of class struggle into a single, final struggle of human history, into the dialectical peak of tension between bourgeoisie and proletariat.” 1/x
“The contradictions of many classes were thus simplified into a single, final contradiction. In place of many earlier classes - capitalists, landowners, wage workers - there appears a single class contradiction. This simplification signified a powerful increase in intensity.” 2/x
“The most monstrous wealth confronts the most horrific misery; the class that owns everything faces the class that owns nothing; the bourgeois, who only possess, who only has and who is no longer human, opposes the proletarian, who has nothing and who is nothing but a person.”3/x
Read 14 tweets
27 Sep
Thank you to everyone who has subscribed to the new MartyrMade Substack. I’ve been out of town since last Thursday, but a new subscribers-only podcast will be out this week. (1/x) martyrmade.substack.com
It’s very hard for me to promote the podcast, and I’ve relied almost entirely on word-of-mouth. Strange as it seems for someone with a podcast, I’m painfully, awkwardly shy and have trouble seeing value in anything I do. (2/x)
I spent the weekend w/very interesting & accomplished people who often approached to say they were big fans of the podcast. I invariably blushed and deflected every compliment, way past the point where it became a bit embarrassing. It’s just hard to believe or accept. (3/x)
Read 7 tweets
23 Sep
It was obvious at the time, but it’s no longer disputable that the CIA, Big Tech & corporate press colluded with the DNC to censor true reporting about clear political corruption by Hunter Biden, and serious evidence of Joe Biden’s involvement. rumble.com/vmteq5-new-pro…
Conservatives and Trump supporters will not be surprised by this, but my hope is that any liberal/left-leaning who consider themselves good-faith actors, and not simply win-at-all-costs ideological fighters, will listen to this and consider its meaning & long-term implications.
It is possible to be happy, in a general sense, that Trump is no longer President while still recognizing that what the CIA & Big Tech did w/the Hunter laptop reporting was a perhaps unprecedented perversion our system. It’s the kind of thing that ends republics.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(