Article then gives a platform to people who have been constantly wrong, including GBDs Livermore, and goes on to try and create concern for 5+ vaccines
Livermore says vaccinating children for herd immunity is scientifically week, he's spent best part of the past two years arguing for children to be infected to "protect the vulnerable" with herd immunity
Weak*
He was happy to be in HART despite them producing lots of antivax content and conspiracy theories, involved with Russia Sputnik, the one they are accused of stealing from AZ....
Apparently we already see signs of herd immunity, during half term holiday
But this is the best bit
Says risk of ICU is 1/500,000
Later says 259 ICU admissions
259×500,000
So 129,500,000 children have been infected in the UK?
🤯
Then we have Viner, whose April 2020 paper claiming unlike flu children seem to have little impact on transmission, far less likely to be infection and adult to child transmission is very rare
Basis against school measures around world for a year
Viner argued to remove masks, then after masks had been removed claimed we had masks in classrooms improved ventilation and social distancing in schools would continue to keep us safe
This Mail article is a preemptive attack against vax for 5-11, pushing a pro infection stance, encouraging hesitancy and attacking who will be most vocal critics of abandoning children to infection
🧵Oh what a suprise, Together Declaration are part of this network, and members of the Exec like UsForThem founder Kingsley accused anyone who said they were a hard right political project of smears and defamation
2/ Founded as anti-lockdown but going straight into anti-vax talking points, Together then switched to anti Ulez, anti net zero heading towards climate change denial
3/ They have been one of the main groups peddling nonsense about the WHO pandemic treaty, starting two years ago with Farage then becoming the leading face of a new astroturf group
While much of the media claims the inquiry is accomplishing nothing, its slowly revealed the gov knew transmission occurs in schools and causes harm to a not insignificant number of children
2/ The bill gives the Secretary of State the power to add to the list of interests that can access your childrens data through secondary legislation avoiding parliamentary scrutiny
3/ The Bill also permits 14-18 year olds to be targeted with political marketing
3/ More and more evidence emerges of the long term harms caused by covid, but the UK govs preferred paedatricians continue to peddle claims that with enough infections children will develop lasting immunity
Said this would occur after 1 infection, what is it now? 5? 7? 10?🤷♂️
🧵Cass Review
Not had a chance to read the whole thing yet, but have had time to look through the main points
What positives can be taken from it? The time spent on waiting lists was identified as a major issue, all children's services are massively underfunded at the moment
2/ I would like to think that this will lead to an investment in all children's support services like CAHMS, more pastoral support in schools etc
That would be a positive outcome, regardless of what else is included in the review, unfortunately real terms cuts are the reality
3/ What matters is how government interprets the review and what it chooses to implement, additional funding for children isn't going to be prioritised over tax cuts to appease RW papers
Imagine if the billions from last round of tax cuts had instead been invested in children