One day, we will be ready to have the discussion about abolition, emancipation and manumission in the context of women in Jewish marriage.
Much of the current discussion focuses on manumission--the man voluntarily setting his wife free--as the ideal outcome. Is this really our best aspiration?
#Funfact: the document to release a slave and to release a woman are both called a get. The word for slaveowner and husband are both "ba'al."
The only people I've seen, so far, who translate the word "get" as "writ of manumission" are @cwjisrael's founder and executive director @susanweiss, and @GailLabovitz. I now do too. It is important to be precise with our terminology if we want to accurately diagnose the problem.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel Stomel

Rachel Stomel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RStomel

2 Sep
There was a case in Israel like this about 10 years ago-- a guy married a woman for the purposes of extorting her for a get. He fled to America the day after the wedding (using plane tix he bought pre-wedding) and then told her his price of 40,000 shekels for a get. >
The Israeli Rabbinic Court told her that she needed to pay him the price he wanted (otherwise, it would be a "forced get"). She was 19, had no money, & was now an agunah after 1 day of "marriage." She launched a crowdfunding campaign. More hurdles along the way. Long story short>
She was finally freed two years later when a private, non-state rabbinic court was convened by Mavoi Satum, a women's org, to halachically annul her marriage. (The way they did this was by declaring the man's conversion invalid, and therefore the marriage invalid as well) >
Read 5 tweets
31 Aug
Anything at all, if you’re a woman in many Orthodox shuls!
Thankfully, my current shul allows women to speak and I’ve done it twice—once a couple weeks ago, when I led an interactive shiur about mamzerut, and two years ago, when my husband and I gave a joint drasha for our anniversary
Read 4 tweets
26 Aug
The reason it’s considered “for the child’s own good” to list an ex-husband—who is not the child’s biological father—as the child’s legal father has to do with halachic principles that, originally, were beneficial but today can be harmful. Here’s how:
A mamzer is a product of a biblically forbidden relationship—either certain forms of incest or a married woman’s affair (but not a married man’s affair). It is a devastating stigma: a mamzer cannot marry within “the congregation of God” ie other Jews (except mamzerim & converts)
(And yes, the fact that converts are excluded from the designation “congregation of God” is disturbing and a discussion for a different thread)
Read 20 tweets
26 Aug
Picture this: You leave an abusive relationship, get divorced, and a few years later, remarry and have a baby. But in the hospital, to your horror, when they write down the baby's legal details, they insist on recording your ex as the baby's father, for the baby's "own good."
🧵>
This is the story of one of our clients, including testimony in her own words from a speech she gave in the Knesset a few years ago, with the hopes of shedding light on a problem that few people understand. Names and details have been changed to protect her identity.
2/
"Six years ago, I decided to separate from my now ex-husband. I asked him for a divorce. He told me that he would not give me a get (Jewish bill of divorce) because he thought we weren't done for good. He thought I would change my mind and we would live happily ever after.
3/
Read 27 tweets
2 Jun
Note that this monthly fine was approved by the same R Lau who opposes all halachic prenups, which work by requiring the recalcitrant party to pay the other a monthly sum until the get is given.
What’s the difference here? >>
1) Well, with a halachic prenup, both men and women can use it to extract themselves from get refusal; here, the beit din will only levy fines on a woman but never on a man (because of the concern of a “forced get”)

And
2) With a halachic prenup, the victim can go to a civil court and directly enforce the financial support clause, without needing the beit din's approval; here, only the beit din can control who is allowed to get help, who does not, and when.
Read 4 tweets
1 Jun
Female converts having to dunk in a mikveh in the presence of three men.
To be clear, my beef here is with rabbis who insist they must be in the room the whole time watching.
For those who want to learn more about how this happens in Israel, check out the documentary film
מעשה באישה וחלוק
by @Nurit_Jacobs
woman.aluma-films.com
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(