So I kind of get the sense that a lot of people have lost track of what’s happening with infrastructure, or checked out. That makes sense because it’s really complicated. But right now BAD THINGS MIGHT BE HAPPENING. Here’s my best attempt to explain how.
So you have the two bills: 1. the bipartisan bill (often referred to as BIF for bipartisan infrastructure framework). It was negotiated by moderates. 2. the reconciliation bill, or Build Back Better, which is the rest of Biden’s agenda and all the stuff most people care about.
Here’s the key facts about the bipartisan bill: it was passed by the Senate in the summer, so if the House passes it, it immediately becomes law. Also it contains a bunch of money for WV, so Manchin really seems to want it. It’s nothing special otherwise, though.
The reconciliation bill, by contrast, hasn’t passed the Senate. So even if the House passes it, it still has to get past Manchin and Sinema. And therein lies the dilemma!
What’s been going on for many months is that centrists in the House AND Senate have wanted the House to go ahead and pass the bipartisan bill first, making it law, while the reconciliation bill isn’t finished.
It’s pretty clear why they want this.
It would provide Biden with a (small) PR win, but it would also be great for the centrists. That’s because right now, the main thing keeping some of them from walking away from the larger reconciliation bill altogether seems to be that they’re worried about the bipartisan bill.
If the bipartisan bill becomes law, suddenly those centrists can just “pause,” as Manchin describes it, and not risk anything. Nothing can stop them from doing this! They can blow up the reconciliation bill by walking away, or plausibly make that threat and get huge concessions.
Back in August, everyone recognized this risk. Biden and Pelosi both said that reconciliation would have to go first. But gradually they both lost their nerve. There’s a sense they need to pass something, anything, and the bipartisan bill is ready to go.
I want to be clear that no one ever really explained why their position on this changed. The rationales given were usually something “The time has come,” but of course the underlying strategic dilemma is unchanged, so it really feels like they just got spooked.
So what happened is that it fell to House progressives to stick to the original strategy and hold up the bipartisan bill. That in turn keeps Manchin and Sinema from walking away from the larger reconciliation law. They’ve managed to do so, outlasting Pelosi’s attempts to pass it.
So what’s happened yesterday is that suddenly the House progressives switched their position and decided to pass the bipartisan bill, giving up their leverage. And it’s really hard to explain why this happened! But it looks really bad, like Manchin and Sinema won a total victory.
It’s clear that Manchin, at least, hasn’t changed his mind about the reconciliation bill. He’s been calling for a “pause” for months and yesterday he was blasting it again. But for some reason House progressives have decided to relinquish their leverage over him anyway.
What’s worse is that nobody can really explain why progressives have given up their blockade. A lot of people are saying they’ve decided to “trust Biden,” but he’s made the same promises all along and never budged Manchin and Sinema. So trust him why?
A bunch of people are calling what progressives are doing a “leap of faith.”
That sounds nice, but in the real world, it’s usually a bad idea to gamble everything you care about on a giant high-risk leap you can’t rationally explain. It’s a phrase to paper over bad decisions.
The more plausible explanations are the worst ones.
Progressives have been under a lot of pressure from centrist Democrats to cave. There’s a sense centrists will blame them if Dems lose Virginia today, arguing (not really plausibly) that if the bipartisan bill has passed, McAuliffe would be more popular. People are panicky.
For weeks now, Pelosi and other Dem leaders have been trying to get these bill through the House, get it off their plate, ignoring the basic strategic dilemma with a sort of glob optimism it’ll all work out, or if it doesn’t, it wasn’t ever meant to be.
Basically, short-termism has taken over the minds of many Democrats: we have to do something, and this is something. The problem is, doing THIS thing undermines their ability to pass the bulk of Biden’s agenda. But gradually wishful thinking has taken hold. “Maybe it’ll be fine!”
So the simplest explanation is that now finally that same wishful thinking has spread to progressives. They too have lost sight of why it’s so important to hold the bipartisan bill as leverage, and are taking a “leap of faith” that suddenly Manchin and Sinema will come aboard.
It’s could work out anyway. No one really knows what Manchin and Sinema want. But the fear - very well-justified! - is that the two people making a lot of bad-faith demands all along are just waiting until the perfect opportunity to kill Build Back Better, or rip its heart out.
A lot of people have spent the last few months saying “Manchin holds all the cards, there’s no leverage over him.” That wasn’t really true: he wanted the bipartisan bill.
But if the House pass the bipartisan bill, it will BECOME true. He’ll be fully unleashed. Be afraid.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Seems to me this really the map everyone should think long and hard about if they want to talk about Virginia.
This map blows apart almost all the takes about McAuliffe and Youngkin and CRT and education and suburban parents and school closures and so forth! Because if any of them were true, you could see it on this map. The suburbs would go one way. Other places would be different.
What we see instead is a large, nearly-uniform statewide shift. Big, small, red, blue, city, country, everywhere shifted just about the same.
If you lose ground everywhere, it's not because you lost a battle on an individual issue related to a handful of places or people.
People are being ultra-credulous about this absurd take. If parents are angry about closures, why is it only manifesting now, AFTER SCHOOLS REOPENED? And why doesn’t it show up in any poll? And does it mean Dems have already solved the issue, since schools have reopened?
The greatest skill of our pundit class is to take whatever thing they’re obsessed with (e.g. defund the police, school closures) and use it to directly explain election results many months later, completely absent any directly observed change or even a plausible causal chain
This is truly absurd, not least because it suggests the main thing Dems need to do for 2022 is eliminate the remaining COVID protections in schools. If you think that’ll reverse a wave, you’re out of your mind.
Today has been a perfect litmus test to see which of you are capable of thinking for yourselves, and which of you just blindly follow the leader. And I gotta say, it's not looking good for like 90% of you.
Progressives all deciding that voting for BIF is a good idea because other people are saying is literally "If all your friends jumped off a cliff, would you jump off a cliff too?" They're even calling it a "leap of faith" for god's sake.
serious question: what has changed on build back better since last week? negotiations are still in progress and the holdouts are still holding out. but there's a really noticeable effort to push it past the house progressives with all this celebratory "mission accomplished!" talk
Maybe it's possible Manchin will kill the bill unless it's $1.5 trillion, AND excludes CEPP, AND excludes methane fees, AND includes mean-testing, AND excludes a billionaire's tax, etc. etc.
But no one is even asking that. It's just assumed he can write every single provision
Did the GOP holdouts on the 2017 tax bill, like Bob Corker, get to write the whole bill exactly to their liking? No? They just had to suck it up and decide whether to back a bill that they didn't love?
Well, then why do we have to let Manchin write all of BBB?
What some people have missed with regards to this thread is that the question of whether Dems will have to compromise with Manchin (yes) is separate from the question of whether they've maximized their leverage over him (no!)
Clearly the reconciliation bill is not going to be the progressive's dream bill under any circumstances. But there are still a range of possible outcomes, and right now, the way the talks are working seems to maximize the likelihood we end up closer to Manchin's end of that range
If you want to pressure Manchin, you want to:
-negotiate the deal as a package, not piecemeal negotiations on each provision
-force him to make a hard decision rather than pass a bill he's happy with
-not allow him to bluff you with threats of walking away