Poll results from June and October show the American public never bought the J6 'insurrection' narrative. amgreatness.com/2021/10/31/ame…
Take a look at the results from June and October. Of the Democrats polled, not even 1/3 described J6 as an 'insurrection.'
Here's the breakdown for the two public opinion polls about describing J6. The figures exceed 100% because respondents were allowed to give 3 answers. Fewer people chose words describing grave crimes against the country, opting for less serious offenses as proper descriptions.
Far more Americans surveyed describe J6 in less serious - even lawful - terms than those who chose grave crimes to describe the protests. "Riot" and "protest" were more favored terms than "armed insurrection" or "insurrection." Source: CSP/TIPP poll.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with J Michael Waller

J Michael Waller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JMichaelWaller

2 Nov
Daily Mail: "One of the experts quoted in the [@TuckerCarlson] documentary, J Michael Waller...'During the Cold War, I infiltrated Soviet international front organizations for the purpose of causing provocations that would discredit the Soviets,' he said." dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
Afterthought: As a US senator, Joe Biden was echoing some of those Kremlin active measures themes. One of the Americans helping the Soviets at the 1986 KGB event was a congressional staffer, Barbara Lee, who is now a Member of Congress. @RepBarbaraLee
"Having been trained by professional agitators in the past, I saw [J6] as a coordinated effort [by] different cadres of agents provocateurs and other troublemakers who had a sort of military-like precision in what was to become a storming of the Capitol." dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
Read 4 tweets
1 Nov
See you tonight on Tucker’s show. All of Part 1 on Fox Nation and outtakes on Fox News.
On Tucker tonight, @ElijahSchaffer shows that J6 provocateur Ray Epps is wearing the same gear that I reported on January 13 @securefreedom, and January 14 in @FDRLST. Same for the young man in the backward MAGA hat.
It was just a cameo appearance on Tucker. Stream the whole episode for free at TuckerCarlson.com.
Read 6 tweets
29 Oct
"I’m thinking, the whole world is promoting diversity."

Refugee from Tibet who became NYC cop then became enemy spy for ChiComs, and suggested using "diversity" fad to recruit more people to betray. theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/…
Powerful article in the Guardian: "How China controls thought and speech beyond its borders."

"Every arm of the PRC government has been called upon to join in the work of influencing opinions, stifling speech and controlling dissent within and beyond its borders."
Sounds like Miles Guo Wengui, doesn't it?

"More numerous than these blatant attacks are the incidences of harassment and intimidation. Exiles and activists all over the world have reported threatening phone calls and cyber-attacks..."
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
'No strategy for victory. At least, not for the Good Guys.' My take on why the Pentagon has no definition of 'strategy' or 'victory.' jewishpolicycenter.org/2021/10/13/no-…
2) Excerpt: 'Victory,' as the Pentagon defines it in its Dictionary of Military & Associated Terms, is – well, it’s not there.

It doesn’t exist.

The Pentagon has no official definition of victory.

The very word itself doesn’t appear once in the more than 350-page dictionary.
3) "the Pentagon dictionary has no definition for 'enemy.'

"The hole is right there on page 74, like a missing tooth, between 'enduring location' and 'engage.'

"No enemy."
Read 16 tweets
21 Oct
Today, Liz Cheney is out there with a targeted direct-mail campaign to bilk people to fund her "courageous conservative leadership" to fight off "the Biden administration's worst instincts."
Liz Cheney is targeting the elderly, many suffering from dementia, with direct-mail fundraising letters. She calls herself an "unapologetic conservative" seeking to promote "traditional conservative values and priorities."

She says she isn't "making a lot of noise or headlines."
This week, Liz Cheney claims to fight "overarching, all-controlling, federal government" and to "strongly oppose the massive waste and liberal priorities crammed into seemingly every bill the Democrats have put forward in the first few months of the Biden administration."
Read 5 tweets
30 Sep
Biden's nominee to regulate America's national banks studied in the USSR under a Lenin scholarship. freebeacon.com/biden-administ…
If you from the Kazakhstan Soviet Socialist Republic and received a Lenin scholarship to Moscow State University in 1989, you were either a Communist or a child of Communist Party members.

If you had really broken with the system, you wouldn't praise the USSR 32 years later.
She has the Lenin prize on her resume at Cornell, but doesn't say anything one way or the other about the Communist Party. Notably, she served in the Bush43 administration. ww3.lawschool.cornell.edu/faculty/facult…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(