The Atlantic taketh away (Friedersdorf, Mounk, the bad Flanagan stuff), and the Atlantic giveth 👇. Said last month that this was a good idea from the magazine, but still not enough to get me to re-subscribe, unfortunately.
This is the rare case where I would much rather pay Charlie Warzel my money directly, rather than see such a good writer bundled with the same people who want to tell me that Ron DeSantis is an acceptable alternative to Trump, rather than just more Trumpism.
There may be a tipping point which brings me back to subscribing to the Atlantic, if enough writers I find vital get under the umbrella so I hold my nose and tolerate the utter nonsense that comes from some of their contributors, but as of yet, not there.
Though, if The Atlantic wanted to hire me as one of the contributors, that would probably do it, though I'm also thinking that at that point a subscription would be one of the fringe bennies.
Trying to think if there's a single writer that if The Atlantic grabbed them up I'd have to suck it up and re-subscribe. @tressiemcphd probably. Or if Molly Ivins was back. I'd tolerate CF's nonsense to be able to read her again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Audiences respond strongly to clarity. Not always positively, but always strongly, and strong response give a chance at meaningful impact. But clarity isn't just about making waves or being provocative. It's being forthright, transparent, and careful...clear.
One way to see instant improvement in student writing is to give them writing problems that require clarity in response. They'll perk right up if they're given permission to unleash their genuine thoughts. Too much of school suggests we don't want that, though.
Just once, I'd like to read a McWhorter column fashioned out of something other than straw. This one is a master class in question begging.
For the record, I agree that making people feel guilty is not a great approach to anti-racism, but the piece assumes that making whites feel guilty - specifically for things in the past - is an explicit goal of anti-racist movements. This isn't true.
"Feeling bad" about what happened in the past is not the same thing as assigning or engendering guilt. I feel bad about the Tulsa Race Massacre. I feel bad that our public higher education system was established in a way to purposefully exclude Black students.
Despite being an amateur Brooks-ologist, I had never seen this piece by @sissenberg that brilliantly takes Brooks seriously enough to show how ridiculous he is. I can't believe we've been blighted with this guy's opinions for so long. h/t @KevinMKrusephillymag.com/news/2004/04/0…
Brooks' response when @sissenberg calls him to ask about some of the uh...made up shit he puts in his writing is very telling about how Brooks see himself unique privileged as someone who somehow gets to tell truths with what are actually lies.
I've spent a lot of time being irritated by Brooks, but also believing he's essentially harmless, but I think there's a line between @sissenberg's coverage of Brooks 15+ years ago to today's Substack warrior culture where the best $'s is in reflecting what people already believe.
Higher ed leaders say student mental health is their number one concern according to this @ACEducation survey. If that's true, there's things that can be done. /thread. acenet.edu/News-Room/Page…
One thing is to confront how the very structure and practice of "schooling" has created a generation (or two) for whom school itself is their primary source of stress. The way we "school" students is a big part of the problem itself. insidehighered.com/blogs/just-vis…
Asking everyone to do MORE is not a solution to the problem of student mental health. This includes requiring students to add a "mindfulness" practice to their array of responsibilities. Remove the stressor, rather than trying to cope with a fundamentally bad situation.
Having used Rufo to drive a wedge into the culture with ginned up B.S., the more mainstream conservative education reformers start to edge away. thedispatch.com/p/the-right-wa…
Let's not get too excited. The same piece is filled with B.S. about anti-racist pedagogy/CRT/etc..., but it appears to recognize that the push has the potential to become a political liability. Do I think this is a principled stand? Please....it's about power, always.
If there were any principle behind it, they would've resisted Rufo from the beginning, but he was useful for a time. Now, they're going to start to insist they barely knew the guy.
The status quo system of higher education in the country is diseased. Requiring institutions to compete with each other in order to enroll students to capture their tuition dollars is fundamentally destructive. wsj.com/articles/biden…
Four-year schools lobby against free community college because it may hurt 4-yr schools' revenue. This is rotten stuff, but it's primarily a problem of a system that makes chasing revenue paramount.
Carol Christ, current chancellor of Cal-Berkeley put it plainly: "Colleges and universities are fundamentally in the business of enrolling students for tuition dollars." This is an operations mindset and it dominates higher ed because under the current structure, it has to.