"We have significant concerns about the adequacy of NIH oversight of EcoHealth and the related research activities at the WIV and other organizations in China." republicans-energycommerce.house.gov/wp-content/upl…
"NIH also failed to report EcoHealth’s noncompliance and grant suspension into the SAM.gov database that alerts other U.S. Government agencies to risky grant recipients..."
"NIH, USAID and Department of Defense (DoD) have paid EcoHealth more than $23.4 million in new and renewed assistance awards since April 2020, when NIH should have reported the administrative action it took against EcoHealth’s grant."
1. Does NIH plan to stop funding EcoHealth until it is compliant with NIH’s requests?
2. Does NIH plan to recover the money paid to EcoHealth on its suspended grant?
3. Please identify who authorized the $369,819 funding issued to EcoHealth on July 13, 2020, and the specific authority for this funding.
4. Does NIH intend to enter the EcoHealth suspension into the SAM.gov database that is intended for agency reporting of temporary or permanent suspensions?
5. Please provide all funded and denied grant applications, progress and final reports for all NIH grants awarded to EcoHealth Alliance as a prime or subgrant recipient in
unredacted form.
6...
a. all documents that were not provided to The Intercept, including the letter from EcoHealth on which NIH based its decision to increase the award,
b. EcoHealth’s original application, and
c. all other original documents for which only the revised versions were produced.
7. Please provide all correspondence between EcoHealth and NIH, including any letter exchanges about NIH’s identification of EcoHealth research that potentially included GOF experiments and EcoHealth’s response, dated in May, June, and July of 2016 and
July 2018...
7. cont: all correspondence between EcoHealth and NIH, including any letter exchanges about humanized mice experiments conducted during Year Five of the grant. Please also include another missing letter from EcoHealth to NIH that was used as the basis to increase the award amount
8. Please provide an accounting of all EcoHealth subawards, including contracts or any other agreements, to all organizations and scientists located in or sponsored by China from the year 2000 to the present.
9. Please facilitate access for Committee staff and the undersigned to EcoHealth’s genomic sequence data and/or database of unpublished and published sequences.
*This is crucial*
10. Please provide all documentation regarding NIH’s resource coordination with USAID, EcoHealth, DoD, and any other communications in which NIH took steps to ensure no overlap of U.S. Government agency funds for the same research was occurring.
11. Provide EcoHealth’s original Year Four progress report for period of June 1, 2017 to May 31, 2018, that would have been submitted in 2018.
12. Provide the list of all NIH personnel involved in development of HHS P3CO framework with an explanation of each individual’s role.
13. What would be the purpose of conducting humanized mice experiments other than to test whether a virus could infect human cells?
14. Please make appropriate NIAID personnel available to Committee staff to address questions about the handling of the EcoHealth grant.
15. When did NIAID first learn that EcoHealth had conducted the humanized mice experiment proposed in 2016?
16. Why did NIAID conduct an HHS P3CO review of the EcoHealth research proposal if the experiment was already conducted?
17. Why were less risky alternative approaches to EcoHealth’s proposed experiment not considered and discussed?
18. Please explain why NIAID concluded that the EcoHealth grant was not subject to the HHS P3CO framework.
Lol. Small wonder that Collins suddenly retired.
On July 13, 2020, NIH issued a revised award approval notice to EcoHealth for 6th year of the suspended project, despite NIH’s suspension of all grant activities.
NIH designated specific allocations of $76,301 for WIV, & $75,600 for Institute of Pathogen Biology in Beijing.
This entire letter is just fire. Was sent on October 27th.
2) EcoHealth failed to provide NIH w/contractually obligated 2019 fifth-year report until this month.
But EcoHealth’s 2018 report should have immediately alerted NIH that agency money was being used to create coronaviruses that were far more pathogenic than the original viruses.
3) The 2018 disclosures by EcoHealth highlight two problems:
1) EcoHealth had already violated the terms of its grant.
2) The fact that EcoHealth made the NIH aware of the results of its gain-of-function experiments in 2018, placed an inherent oversight requirement on NIH.
Even Michael Isikoff knows: “When you actually get into the details of the Steele dossier, the specific allegations, we have not seen the evidence to support them...some of the more sensational allegations will never be proven and are likely false."
Article notes that researchers have created a laboratory virus that “does not exist in nature” and that “important information and insights can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory.”
Farrar sent email to Collins & Fauci w/@zerohedge - Coronavirus Contains "HIV Insertions", Stoking Fears Over Artificially Created Bioweapon
Zerohedge banned by Twitter next day.
Collins, as Fauci's boss, has somehow managed to evade attention.
Collins email to Farrar on 1-1-20: “Hi Jeremy, I can make myself available at any time 24/7 for the call with Tedros. Just let me know. Thanks for your leadership on this critical and sensitive issue. Francis.”
A detailed two-part timeline that provides an in-depth look at events that led to a global pandemic, and the ensuing cover-up of the virus’s origins. theepochtimes.com/infographic-co…
2) The timeline is composed of two parts:
- The primary timeline of overarching events - in the years leading to the pandemic & events that followed.
- A secondary timeline that walks through detailed events of the days surrounding Fauci's secret teleconference on Feb. 1. 2020.
3) Our exploration of this topic led us to create an ever-growing timeline - increasingly used in our research as the information flow became almost overwhelming.
As the timeline became increasingly valuable to our work, we discussed the option of getting a public version out.
The CHS, who appears to have meaningful knowledge of Steele’s and Fusion GPS’s activities, gives the FBI a list of "individuals and entities who have surfaced in [the investigative firm's] examination.
2) Aug 2 - A supervisor of the Counterintelligence Division shares information that had been provided in late July 2016 by a confidential human source with Jonathan Moffa, who then provides the information to Strzok, Pientka, and the supervisory intel analyst on the same day.
3) Mid-Sept: McCabe tells Pientka not to have any further contact with an unknown former confidential human source (CHS) who reached out to the FBI in late July 2016 and appeared to have personal knowledge regarding Steele’s election reporting and sources.
Reminder: Former top FBI lawyer James Baker said Sussmann was source for NYT.
Baker: He was the source — he told me the New York Times was aware of this. We, the FBI, went to the New York Times and then started a series of conversations with them to try to get them to slow down.
2) Baker’s initial meeting with Sussmann took place on Sept. 19, 2016.
Steele had just produced a series of three new memos dated Sept. 14, 2016. One of these memos directly referenced Alfa Bank—misspelled in Steele’s memo as “Alpha.” theepochtimes.com/baker-testimon…
3) On Sept. 23, Michael Isikoff of Yahoo News published his article on Carter Page, which came from information provided by Steele, would later be cited by the FBI in the Page FISA application.