on the positive manifestation of female power- its 9:15 am and im driving through the rain to the next town over. im looking for a parking lot behind a purple playground. a woman is meeting me there. i see her. i park next to her. she hands me a cooler of frozen breast milk. [..]
ive never met this woman before. we have the same last name. just a coincidence- i thought this was noteworthy but she finds it uninteresting. i thank her, she tells me she understands, its not a big deal, + drives away. this is the second time i have received a package like this
these are not incidental rendezvous as, no shade to anyone who has done this, im trying to avoid giving my less than a week old baby feed from a transnational mega-corporation. and now i can do this, because of these women, who don’t know me, who have no incentive to help me.
apparently this is “a thing” and something deep in the female mind goes village valkyrie mode and, perhaps via some type of animal magnetism, forms spontaneous altruistic networks to assist babies, and men such as myself, standing in the rain, in a cow hat (another coincidence).
i, male, am, obviously, more used to male power. i guess this manifests as what we typically think of as power. i can move heavy stuff, i can make elaborate strategy game-esque plans easily, and deep down theres a part of my brain that knows i could hit something with a big stick
so its quite interesting to have found myself, twice thus far, in a situation where, as a guy, theres literally nothing i can do about something i actually really need. theres no breast milk store. i, sadly, cant bring a large earthen vessel down to the milk river.
even if i were to, just hypothetically, go full caveman 5,000 BC mode, that wouldn’t even do anything. there’s just nothing to be done. totally powerless to solve something with no options. that’s an interesting place to be in, that today, is relatively rare, i think.
i couldn’t help but tie this into current discussions and conversations about gender dynamics and the male / female divide. for the most part, there are some things men can do that women can’t. that’s true. but, usually, it’s not that women literally 100% cant do them period.
its usually just that men are vastly more suited to it, or slightly more suited to it. its mostly semantic, there are some things only men can do, but maybe you see what im saying. its easier for guys to move heavy stuff but ultimately a bunch of women could as least try.
on the flip side, of course there are some things women are more suited towards, but its interesting to, as a guy, hit a wall where its literally 1000% impossible for me to even attempt something absolutely crucial for my life. its a thousand foot high wall. no way around it.
and then there are just these random women around, who dont know me, who have literally no reason at all to help me, who just roll up like “ha, yeah, ill help you get over this wall. no worries, bye”. they don’t even take any money for it, they just leave. thanks, bye.
its an interesting footnote if youre somewhat obsessed with the zeitgeist, like myself, which has lately concerned itself immensely with discussions of power, sex, the general dynamic between men and women. i have encountered some positive primal manifestation of female-ness.
perhaps this is the female equivalent of deadlifting 300 lbs or the hyper-male energy we commonly see online in our space. only they could do it. one diamond node in an invisible baby network, rolling up in a silver SUV, in a rainy parking lot, theres a man, in a flannel shirt...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
i have been thinking a lot about sex and my relationship to sex after having a baby. now that im on the other side of it, i can feel the hollow and paper thin nature of sex and sexual desire that is totally decoupled from reproduction in an extremely tangible way. it is very odd.
i was unaware of this, im not sure if all the other men know, but one thing that happens when you get a woman pregnant and then she carries your child is that you get a [lot] more attracted to her, in a way that transcends the logical “well of course that would happen”.
its like a whole new level. to me, being raised in my particular socio-cultural situation, its a whole new dimension of sex, which is funny, because of course thats what sex is about. i have been thinking about this a lot and i think i can pinpoint exactly what “the flip” is here
im extremely intrigued by the internet sociology of a large number people unable to not be very upset by this particular issue. the process described herein is, literally, in every way, directly, exactly what happens irl when art objects are stolen
i think a lot of creative people are getting played because the tech is actually really good for artists - i totally understand if people dont care or are uninterested, that would be normal, but the new “hey part of my personality is hating this” fad is extremely reddit + boring
lol sorry im not trying to be negative. i wont bring this up again but lately when i have a sec away from baby if i open the timeline its literally all “BRO look at these CRYPTO DUDES getting Owned(tm)” like who cares. if i did not like something i would simply not think about it
rerun of some halloween specials from the last two years:
a. 🎃
b. 🎃
was really amped about this one. some people said they had trouble reading the font, so i posted it another time with a different typeface but i cant find it rn and must return to baby. this is how it was supposed to look anyway.
the facebook - meta - metaverse video everyone has been talking about. go deeper. yes, they want you to have VR meetings. but beyond that, this is their way of both announcing and getting in front of “web 3.0” which most people are still unfamiliar with. why? ask yourself this.
im the max level of tech skeptic. i dont expect anything to work properly if it has electricity in it. never owned a microwave. dont really “believe” in artificial intelligence. however as u learn in painting + art history you are always a child of ur time and have to accept that
now that “real life” has been inextricably integrated with the internet there is a very interesting next step unfolding because “web 3.0”, the next phase of tech life, is actually characterized imo by decentralization. de-centralization. who is “the center”. is that good for them
all you have to do to stone cold refute these people is let them talk a little bit and then extend the logic of what theyre saying. they always paint themselves into a corner. he blocked me instantly when i posted this. i say this only so that others may more efficiently do this
just want one tweet on the record in the archives before it happens predicting that this will have some kind of NFT wallet integrated into it (eventually) as will other platforms. the people currently making fun of NFT and crypto will use it. i am 100% confident this will happen.
i dont “correct” or seek to educate other people about this topic because i would rather it not “blow up” for as long as possible. ill just say if you’re here it might be something you want to look into and think about. if its not ur thing or scene, thats cool. i get it.
the big variable imo that im not sure about is what level of adoption actual crypto stuff will have. with NFTs it will be easy to just call them something else and put a wallet tab on instagram or twitter or FB, but actual crypto stuff might have too much of a learning curve, idk