Some small progress regarding the DC Jail. 400 federal inmates (not the Jan6 ones, who are held in a separate, adjacent facility), are being moved to a different federal facility. The DC Jail is run by the DC Dept of Corrections, not the federal Bureau of Prisons. /1 Image
US Marshall Service is responsible for pre-trial fed detainees & contracts w/DC DOC to house federally charged inmates for the DC & MD fed courts. They inspected the DC Jail & found it was subpar to their minimum requirements. As I’ve said many times, DC’s jail is a disgrace./2
Although the Marshalls found the adjacent facility where the Jan6 inmates are held is better than the main jail (which it is) & that it may meet their minimum requirements, that still doesn’t make it acceptable. So this is a small step, but at least it’s in the right direction./3
There is much work to be done on this issue. But, this is a start & it carries weight that the Marshalls Service made these findings at all. /4
The conditions are horrifying 👇🏻& most disgusting of all, food & water is being w/held for “putative” purposes.

This was kicked off because a Republican judge (Lamberth) has the balls to hold public officials to account.

Now the courts, DOJ, & the DC Council will have to act./5 Image
*punitive purposes

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Leslie McAdoo Gordon

Leslie McAdoo Gordon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @McAdooGordon

1 Nov
In the TX law argument, Sotomayor & Kagan expressed surprise when the TX AG said an injunction against his office would not bind local prosecutors. He is correct tho. MD & VA are similar. The county prosecutors aren’t agents of the AG, but rather a different state official./1
This is similar to how the US Attorneys across the country do not report to the US Attorney General; they report to the POTUS. Maybe not surprising that federal practitioners would not know the structure of state law enforcement. But that confusion obfuscated a central point./2
Sotomayor was trying to say: since the legislature has effectively deputized the citizenry to act in the state’s interest, doesn’t that make them state actors & by enjoining the top enforcing guy you enjoin them too? That is probably correct, but she chose the wrong official. /3
Read 4 tweets
31 Oct
One way to clarify in your mind what the correct PRINCIPLE is, is to envision your version of a “worst case” scenario & analyze the principle & proposed actions in that scenario. For example, what if covid was as easily transmissible as it is but as deadly & horrible as Ebola? /1
What if instead of killing mostly old people at about 1-2%, it was killing kids under 15 at 50%?

What measures to prevent transmission or require vaccination would you think were lawful then?

/2
If your answer is ANYTHING other than “none,” then you agree w/the PRINCIPLE that (state) govt in theory has the power to impose lockdowns, mask & social distancing mandates, testing, & vaccinations; the question is not IF it has such power but in the application of that power./3
Read 5 tweets
7 Oct
Some people say to me, “But I can’t take the risk of standing up for x, I can’t afford to lose my job/house/xyz.”

There are several responses to this.

1. If x were important enough, you would do just that.

2. If x is not to that level for you, then support the people . . ./1
. . . who can or are standing up in whatever ways you can - money, time, anonymous speaking, etc.

3. Find another - safer - way to address the same or similar issue.

4. Raise the issue with people you know who may be in a better position than you to act or give support.

/2
5. Use x as a talking point with others where you are safe to gain allies or refine your understanding of it.

6. Use x as a teaching moment for your family. Discuss what your values & beliefs are about it.

/3
Read 4 tweets
3 Oct
America: Here is (part of) the sacrifice you made to preserve the Union & end slavery. This is the National cemetery in Petersburg, VA. Thousands of slain men, from across the nation, many buried as unknowns. Sons, husbands, brothers, fathers.
The cemetery was built in 1866. They found as many of the Union soldiers buried around Petersburg during the battles & reburied them here. Headstones have names, the numbered square stones are unknown Union soldiers.
The fallen came from all over our nation. PA, NY, NJ, Maine.
Read 6 tweets
3 Oct
Lincoln had a clear vision of the nation that should guide us:

“I hold that in contemplation of universal law and of the Constitution the Union of these States is perpetual. Perpetuity is implied, if not expressed, in the fundamental law of all national governments.”/1
“It is safe to assert that no government proper ever had a provision in its organic law for its own termination. Continue to execute all the express provisions of our National Constitution, and . . . “/2
the Union will endure forever, it being impossible to destroy it except by some action not provided for in the instrument itself.” /3
Read 8 tweets
11 Sep
"I appeal to you again to constantly bear in mind that with you, and not with politicians, not with Presidents, not with office-seekers, but with you, is the question, "Shall the Union and shall the liberties of this country be preserved to the latest generation?"Abe Lincoln 1861
Notice that Lincoln emphasizes that this inquiry must be made repeatedly. He uses both the words "again" & "constantly" in his introductory phrase. It is not something done once and then set aside as completed.
The construction of his sentence is designed to put the focus on the hearer - the American people. He does this at least two ways. He uses the powerful "rule of 3" to emphasize it is not politicians, Presidents, or candidates who must decide this, but "you" meaning "us."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(