Michael McConnell and I are excited to announce this conference:
“Histories of Presidential Power”
Constitutional Law Center
@StanfordLaw
Across the ideological and methodological spectrum.
May 20-21: law.stanford.edu/event/spring-c…
Description and list of panels in this post.
Panel 1: How the Presidency Emerged from Colonial, English & Founding Eras
@andrewkent33 (Fordham), Michael McConnell (Stanford), @jdmortenson (Michigan), Eric Nelson (Harvard), Maeve Glass (Columbia)
shugerblogcom.wordpress.com/2021/11/03/his…
Panel 2: The First Congress & Executive Power:
@adityabamzai (UVA), @lmchervinsky (GW, SMU, author The Cabinet: George Washington & the Creation of an American Institution), Mike Ramsey (San Diego), @ilan_wurman (Arizona St), @TheGNapp (Stanford)
Panel 3: What Article II History Teaches About Emergency Powers
@aziz_huq (Chicago), @cmrodriguez95 (Yale), @MeylerBernie (Stanford), Norm Spaulding (Stanford)
@WuerthIngrid (Vanderbilt)
Panel 4: Early Presidential Construction of Constitutional Power
@nikobowie & @DaphnaRenan (Harvard), @GillianMetzger2 (Columbia), Alison LaCroix (Chicago), Nicholas Parrillo (Yale)
Panel 5: Public Fiduciaries and the History of Article II
Ethan Leib (Fordham), Seth Davis (Berkeley)
Panel 6: (Non-)Delegation and the Founding Era:
@WilliamBaude (Chicago), Philip Hamburger (Columbia), @jennmascott (GMU/Scalia), @jdmortenson (Michigan), Nick Parrillo (Yale)
/Fin/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jed Shugerman

Jed Shugerman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jedshug

5 Oct
Context: I am re-reading Roberts Court decisions to understand how originalists/formalists keep repeating the same historical errors.
By relying on precedent and not actual historical materials, they literally repeat the same errors.

Well, what about Roe v. Wade as precedent?
2/ The opening page of Roberts's "historical analysis" in Seila.
1 quote from Madison (who was spinning his own legislative strategy)
1 quote from President Washington in favor of presidential power (surprise.)
Otherwise, 6 citations to Free Enterprise, Bowsher, Hennen & Myers.
3/ Here's the next page of historical evidence about 1787-89:
The 1st paragraph is all from Myers (1926)
The 2d paragraph is Roberts quoting himself in Free Enterprise (2010).
Zero original sources for an originalist argument.
Read 4 tweets
4 Oct
I find it more jarring than ever to read SCOTUS opinions that rely on patently false historical claims, citing precedents instead of actual historical sources to support those false claims...

While we know that in 8 months, SCOTUS will tell us that precedents don't matter.
Yes, this is a subtweet of Chief Justice John Roberts.
And now, @LeahLitman, I can't get the image of Justice Cartman-lito "Respect my Authoritahhh" out of my head.

Great podcast @StrictScrutiny_ @Dahlialithwick
Read 4 tweets
19 Sep
It’s a solid start.
Of a Jewish holiday or a future tort suit? Image
More sukkah up, still no personal injuries.
Massive assumption of risk.
Much unreasonability. Image
Chag Sameach!
Still no injuries, other than a splinter! Image
Read 4 tweets
15 Sep
Biden's vaccine mandate is a good policy, but Congress needs to legislate it, rather than rely on agency regulation.
My research into 18th-century "vesting" suggests valid reasons for SCOTUS to revive the non-delegation doctrine.
1/ New @StanLRev draft:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
2/ Let's start with "vesting" & the unitary executive theory, which is where I started.
Unitary theorists assume the word "vest" had special legal meaning (exclusive & indefeasible).
My research shows that the word "vest" had only a general simple meaning of granting power.
3/ E.g., Richard Epstein in his 2020 book:
“The use of the term ‘vested’ brings back images of vested rights in the law of property; that is, rights that are fully clothed and protected, which means, at the very least, that they cannot be undone by ordinary legislative action...
Read 8 tweets
2 Sep
Confirmation.
The Supreme Court effectively overturned Roe v. Wade by a 5-4 vote last night. Roberts in dissent.

It's not the Roberts Court. It's the Shadow Court.

They didn't even have the decency to schedule a case and pretend to hear arguments.
It's all shadows & cowardice.
Texas strategically avoids judicial review by giving enforcement to private parties.
Sotomayor:
"Texas has deputized the State’s citizens as bounty hunters, offering them cash prizes for civilly prosecuting their neighbors’ medical procedures."
"By relying instead on citizen bounty hunters, Texas sought to make it more complicated for federal courts to enjoin the Act on a statewide basis.
A breathtaking act of defiance—of the Constitution, of this Court’s precedents, and of the rights of women."
Read 5 tweets
27 Aug
Who was the best romantic empiricist?
Robin S?
Robyn?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(