(🔒) MAJOR BREAKING NEWS: Evidence Mounts of Team Trump Plot to Occupy the Capitol on January 6
There's a reason Glenn Youngkin wouldn't let Trump set foot in Virginia. There's a reason Trump is fighting records disclosure. He aided a criminal conspiracy. sethabramson.substack.com/p/major-breaki…
(PS) In just the few hours since I first published this, I've received a tsunami of tips—from January 6 video of Alex Jones talking about "occupying" the Capitol to more quotes from Trump lawyers about occupation to documents that further corroborate the evidence we already have.
(PS2) Lost in the media focus on a single state-level race yesterday—to the exclusion of historic Democratic wins in Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Maine, and other potential battleground states—is the fact that Youngkin won in part by *avoiding* Trump.
(PS3) Let me state it plainly: Glenn Youngkin believes, and most Republicans across the Potomac River in D.C. believe, that Trump participated in a criminal conspiracy to launch a coup—and that he'll *eventually* face some kind of consequence for this, whether legal or political.
(PS4) What this new reporting at PROOF—an outlet cited by Congress and the Washington Post and AFP and Forbes and countless other outlets in just the last couple weeks—does is firmly establish the *named* January 6 plot in which Trump participated: "Operation Occupy the Capitol."
(PS5) Among the tsunami of tips I received yesterday was *audio* of Oath Keepers discussing—on a private channel—re-invading the Capitol on January 7 to "retake" and "hold" it long enough to ensure Trump would be reinstalled as President of the United States. It's stunning audio.
(PS6) Democrats mustn't fall into the trap of discussing nonsense issues the GOP made up out of whole cloth. Here's what matters—the GOP is a pro-sedition party that enables insurrectionist filth who are a clear and present danger to America because they plan to end US democracy.
(PS7) Was McAuliffe a bad candidate who'd lost a governor's race before—in addition to winning one after evading a primary—was seen as a DC insider and Clinton pal (at a time the Clintons animate the GOP more than anything), and should've talked about ending the grocery tax? Yes.
(PS8) But a single race in Virginia isn't a national trend, and in state/local races across America yesterday it was a mixed bag for Republicans. And even in Virginia—consider this—the GOP couldn't allow *the leader of the damn party* to *set foot* in the Commonwealth. Even once.
(PS9) Why was Trump deemed poison to Youngkin? Because so much of the nation—including Virginia—knows that Trump is a traitor to America. Trump sets foot in Virginia, Youngkin *loses*—period. So now journalists' job is to work as hard on *that* story as PROOF has since January 6.
(PS10) I understand Democrats are demoralized by the failure of the FBI or DOJ to act on the January 6 coup plotters—and I understand that corporate media has no interest in saying that one reason for insufficient Democratic voter enthusiasm is this very failure. But I'll say it.
(PS11) But what I won't do is give up. PROOF will keep offering the best reporting on January 6 of any media outlet—because America is at stake in this, not just a single state's governor's mansion. If you want hopelessness, this Twitter feed is not going to be the place for you.
(PS12) Many of you ask, "What can we do?" I'm a journalist, not an organizer; there are others who can answer that question better than me. But a very, very small start? Share articles like the one atop this thread that tell the fully sourced truth about Trump and January 6. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
(🔒) PROOF EXCLUSIVE: In an effort to help combat the rampant misinformation about the Steele dossier that has accompanied the almost implausibly weak Danchenko indictment, I'm publishing the "kompromat" chapter of Proof of Collusion for PROOF subscribers: sethabramson.substack.com/p/proof-exclus…
1/ For those who don't know, Proof of Collusion was a NYT-bestselling work of curatorial journalism that used literally thousands of major-media sources—all of which are cited in the book—to offer the most reliable compendium of information about the 2016 Trump campaign anywhere.
2/ The "Kompromat" chapter of the book is one of several that addresses the Steele dossier. It focuses particularly on the "Ritz Moscow" allegation from the first page of the dossier, and does so by seeking *every single piece of corroboration* for that intel available worldwide.
I don't know anything about this guy. All I know is that I watched him just *one* time—he was doing some chicken-sandwich "taste test" on YouTube—and he was being so aggro and arrogant to his staffers it turned me off immediately. No clue what his deal is. businessinsider.com/barstool-sport…
😳
"In 2020, Madison sent Portnoy a direct message on Instagram complimenting his famous 'one bite' pizza reviews. 'Sick pizza reviews,' she wrote. 'Thanks fly bitch,' Portnoy responded. She was a 20-year-old college student at the time, Portnoy a 43-year-old multimillionaire."
😳
WTF?
"The conversation soon moved to Snapchat and text, where it quickly turned to the topic of sex. He sent her graphic videos of other women he'd slept with, according to Madison, and in messages reviewed by Insider, he pressed her to tell him about her sexual fantasies."
(THREAD) I'm going to itemize every factual inaccuracy in this NYT article—while telling you in advance that none of them will be fixed. I wrote a NYT bestseller on the subject these men have written a story on, so I know *exactly* what needs correcting. nytimes.com/2021/11/04/us/…
ERROR #1: The NYT calls Steele's work "Democratic-funded opposition research." In fact it was first funded by anti-Trump Republicans. After Trump won the 2016 primary, it *later* came to be funded by Democrats. So it was "anti-Trump research" funded by *both* parties' faithful.
ERROR #2: The NYT writes that Steele's work "turned out to be" opposition research funded by Democrats—implying Steele hid the nature of the work from media and the FBI. Not only did he *not* do this, but he *didn't even know who had contracted him*. Fusion GPS never told him.
After how major media overreacted to a couple of races yesterday, they should never again refer to independent journalists or even social media discourse as melodramatic and hyperventilating. Talk about over-journalisming—the reaction to yesterday was preposterously over-the-top.
Before yesterday, everyone in politics agreed Democrats were facing a headwind because of two moderates blocking any action in Congress, the pandemic, and supply-chain issues—all things out of their hands. Today, everyone is pretending to be shocked by mixed-bag election results.
Any journalist who wanted to go on-air today and describe things from yesterday that *genuinely surprised them* was free to do so.
Instead, we got the conventional wisdom from *two* days ago re-packaged as a shocking (shocking!) new development.
I've been watching Periscopes by domestic terrorist Ali Alexander as part of my research for PROOF and can I just say that this man talks about demons and jezebels and curses and hexes and "you got to get woke, people!" more than I've ever heard any Democrat say "woke" or "demon"
This new far right is obsessed with "red-pilling" and being "woke" when these are terms I never ever hear from Democrats, and while we're at it can I say that we've reached the point at which Republicans talk about race *significantly* more than Democrats do? It's all topsy-turvy
I increasingly think when Republicans win it isn't about Democrats, as Republicans don't know what CRT is, aren't experiencing "lockdowns," don't know any Democrat who says "woke"... it's just GOP anxieties projected onto Democrats for lack of the courage to face one's own issues
The McAuliffe loss is about McAuliffe, not the Democrats. 2021 is not the year to run a white male Clinton crony who exudes creepy “DC insider” vibes and is charisma-free. Murphy will win in NJ, and Democrats performed well in other states (like NH). Some folks need to calm down.
The supply-chain issues are largely outside Democrats’ control, but are hurting the party in power, understandably. Biden has done all he can with respect to the pandemic, but the Democrats were still going to face the brunt of Americans’ exhaustion with the state of the world.
I just see a bizarre overreaction from the Democrats to yesterday’s results. When Murphy wins in New Jersey, he will be the first incumbent Democrat to win reelection in that state in about 40 years. Democrats won the reddest city in New Hampshire—a critical battleground state.