"I'm really married to these deviations," says Alaska Redistricting Board member Bethany Marcum during today's meeting. All less than 1%.

At a previous one, staff warned such a focus creates loads of other problems with compactness, socioeconomic integration, etc.

#akleg
You can watch along here:

It's frankly kinda hard to track any of this in real-time, but there's a lot of work right now about smoothing out the district boundaries. Marcum says she wants "straight lines and tight deviations."
Highest deviation for the Anchorage area, per Marcum, is .55%. Which is, admittedly, pretty low. She says she can go even tighter, though, with "zig zags" that pop out of one district, across Tudor or other major roads, and grab a few houses.
She says, though, that those little "zig zag" fingers that grab across the boundaries aren't worth the marginal increase in the deviation numbers. Also notes that they look suspicious (which, true).
The big thing today really looks like Eagle River stuff. The plan they're currently looking at looks like it moves some Eagle River voters into the Anchorage-area districts. They had been trying to avoid that but it's now back on the table apparently.
Now there's questions whether they need to consider the socioeconomic integration of Anch.

Matt Singer says the courts have ruled that considering neighborhood boundaries is "noble" but not at the cost of compact districts. "The socioeconomics in Anchorage takes a backburner."
Now, with less than 10 days before their self-imposed deadline Board Member Budd Simpson asks how they're supposed to balance compactness and deviation against each other.

Singer, the counsel, says basically that anything under 1% is fine. He says even 2% would be fine.
He says there's no legal challenges to his knowledge that have successfully found anything like 1% to 2% would be unacceptable.

(Currently, they're working with about .5% and want to push lower for some reason.)
A lot of crosstalk with a "but LISTEN"
Almost like drawing big complex maps with five human brains in 2021 is kinda hard.
Singer: "The courts don't like bump-outs, fingers or strange shapes."

He says they automatically see them as fishy, creating cause for discovery, and that there must be an ulterior motive here.
Singer then raises the specter of the 2010 round's "Kawasaki Appendage."

"There was an appendage that appeared for an odd reason."

(I covered the lawsuit on that one. It was a big deal designed to go after then-Rep. Kawasaki to put him in Rep. Thompson's district.)

#akleg Image
Here's more detail on the bait-and-switch for the Anchorage plan, yanking a bunch of Muldoon and East Anchorage into Eagle River:

#akleg
And now Marcum seems pretty jazzed that the last round's kinda fishy Anchorage mapping wasn't challenged.

Board Dir. Peter Torkelson says just because it wasn't challenged, doesn't mean it's court-approved.

Marcum says it should be fine, then.

#akleg
Also love a Alaska Redistricting Board hearing where someone says "Randy Ruedrich is waving at us."

I have a memory of Ruedrich waving at the board being a pretty key thing in the 2010 round.

#akleg
Randy keeping an eye on things: Image
Can't imagine courts are going to love maps that sacrificed compactness and socioeconomic integration in favor of a population deviation that's about 1/4 of what counsel just said was acceptable.

But, ya know, is it really redistricting if the courts don't blow up the maps?
Bahnke, reading prior court rulings: "It's clear to me that we can't sacrifice compactness in an effort to achieve less than 2 percent population deviation."

Marcum: "I don't believe that sacrifice compactness, it has many extremely straight lines."

#akleg
Bahnke says the court rulings are clear that "compactness trumps deviation when we're down to such low numbers as even lower than 2 percent."
Singer's advice: Use your eyes.
Bahnke says that, basically, increasing perimeters (as was the case with Eagle River expansion) "for the sake of reducing deviation is going to have us run afoul of our constitutional mandate."

#akleg
Everyone's fed up with Anchorage (an eternally true statement) so they're moving on down to the Kenai Peninsula and Gulf Coast areas.
Blanked a bit, but Singer summing things up: "I don't think there's a case that tells us what the answer is here."
They agree to something (I missed precisely what)

Bahnke: "There should be fireworks that go off each time we agree on something."
Bahnke, who is from Kotzebue, raises some concerns about the boundaries for the Western rural districts. She says she's concerned it would "compromise socioeconomic integrity."

Binkley: "Well, I would disagree." Image
Bahnke notes that her grandma is from Crooked Creek. She says it's more closely related to the coastal communities than the Interior. She's talking about connections with health care connections, which is also coming up with Good News Bay (which is more connected to Dillingham) Image
TJ Presley, the board's deputy director, interjects as things get a little feisty between the board members: "I really think we should eat lunch. Strongly support it."

They break for lunch.
They've been back for a bit (I just got back from walking the dog). Still discussing the boundaries of the coastal House districts.
It's been interesting to hear Board Member Bahnke (who's from Nome, not Kotzebue as I tweeted earlier) is really bringing a lot of the local knowledge and preferences for which communities are closer.

Binkley is currently doubting she actually speaks for the communities.
Bahnke, in an exchange with Binkley (who's dismissing what's she's saying about the community connections): "Show me."
Bahnke is works/lives in Nome but is from Savoonga*

Apologies for the mis-tweet earlier.
There's a lot of back and forth over which regional ANCs should have preference over the others.

Borromeo: This weighted preference to Calista is very uncomfortable to me.

Binkley: "I see it as just the opposite." He says they've been just as involved as Doyon, etc.
Bahnke says it seems like Binkley's trying to "negotiate" with her on the layout of the district in order to keep something in place regarding Fairbanks.

He says that's not the case.

It sounds like they're not exactly sure what he's proposing here. Staff's helping sort it out.
Bahnke really gets into it with Binkley over some of the apparent socioeconomic connections in the areas covered by this map. She's asking him how what he's defending is better-connected than her proposal.

Binkley: I just can't answer that, to be honest with you.
Bahnke: ... It takes us a step backward."

Binkley: I'm not certain about that, I think Calista has a different opinion about that.

Bahnke: Well it doesn't improve the socioeconomic integrity.
Binkley looks at his proposal and says it's fine because Calista likes it.

Bahnke: But what about Doyon's request?

Binkley says they're in conflict and you can't ignore Calista.

Bahnke is now proposing an alternative that she says does a better job at meeting everyone's needs.
Binkley says again that it's all fine. Isn't it what Doyon wants after all? (Being spread across two as opposed to four districts)

Bahnke: It's not what they requested.

Binkley: It's what Calista requested.
Just from the perspective of someone who covered the last redistricting lawsuit, it's sure gonna be interesting to have this kind of record to work off of.
Bahnke: "I get that everyone's got their preferences, but we've constitutional mandates."

Binkley: "That may be their opinion on the constitutional mandate of it."
They're huddling over some physical maps right now (audio is halfway decent) over the Calista-preference maps.

Bahnke: "We don't share a ceremony, we don't share a language." Image
Marcum and Binkley really going to bat for Calista here. Bahnke and Borromeo argue that everyone should be able to get a little of what they want instead of someone (Calista) getting everything they want.

Really boils down to whether or not such a preference is allowable.
This is getting kinda ugly.

Borromeo now getting into it with Binkley about why he's continuing to seemingly favor Calista over everyone else. He says it's fine cuz they gave Doyon a lot of what they wanted, why shouldn't Calista get everything they wanted?
I think a lot of this is a fight because decisions made over the rural Interior district is gonna have a big impact on how the Fairbanks districts (Binkley's home turf) plays out.
Borromeo says the proposed changes that Binkley's favoring (the ones that Calista likes) is that it doesn't make it better than what the board has already drawn as a group.

Binkley: "I would disagree with you."
Marcum says basically agree to disagree and let's move onto Fairbanks. Whatever they end up doing there will also impact these other areas.
Onto Fairbanks. Binkley sums up his view: Will they break the boundaries of the Fairbanks North Star Borough and where do they send the excess population if they do?

It sounds like it'd go in with HD36, which is the Interior, then Valdez would go w Mat-Su (which neither want).
The Valdez Question: Does Valdez go in with Mat-Su or the Interior?

Marcum says Valdez should go with the Interior, referencing boat registrations, and that Denali should go with the Mat-Su.
If they've gotta knock out about 4,000 people from the district, which ones are more socioeconomically integrated with the destined district of HD36 (rural Interior). Binkley says the Northern area of the borough.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Acuña Buxton

Matt Acuña Buxton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mattbuxton

5 Nov
Alaska Redistricting Board is back on record after a long lunch break. So far today, they've had an executive session, a last-minute map rewrite by Marcum (of v.3 map) and a load of public testimony AGAINST that map.

Now they're expected to take some action on the maps.

#akleg
Previous thread of today's hearing here:

Binkley says the plan is to wrap up the map by the end of today with plans for finalization over the weekend. Then they'll get to Senate pairings next week.

#akleg
There's some discussion about House District numberings. It's important, it seems, for just identifying the potential Senate pairings to consider over the weekend.

It doesn't sound like the potential pairings would be bound by the ordering of the numbers, though.
Read 20 tweets
5 Nov
Alaska Redistricting Board is underway. They're currently discussing the Anchorage-area maps. Changes this morning:

-East Anchorage/Muldoon no longer tied to Eagle River
-Split Mountain View out of the Downtown Anchorage district

#akleg

Watch here: zoom.us/j/9074062894?p…
Marcum, kinda switching tone from last meetings, says that there needs to be a balance between compactness and population deviation. There had been a lot of focus on getting deviation down to .5% when counsel has said as high as 2% would be unlikely to be overturned.

#akleg
Muldoon/East Anchorage would be more paired with JBER population than Eagle River by the looks of it.

Still hard to really see what's going on with this form of presentation.
Read 55 tweets
4 Nov
The Alaska Redistricting Board is already underway. They're now looking at the Fairbanks-area maps drawn by Chair Binkley. As always, hard to really get a good, detailed look at it.

Watch: zoom.us/j/9074062894?p…

#akleg Image
Bahnke asks about the decision to put Fort Wainwright in the city districts and not the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Binkley says UAF is integrated with the boro more than city.

Singer: "You don't have to be terribly concerned about socioeconomic integration of the borough."
And there's discussion about where to put Cantwell. Binkley says it should go in the rural Interior district and pretty much everyone agrees based on testimony from Ahtna. It sounds like the trickle-down effect is Valdez DOES end up with the Mat-Su area districts.

#akleg
Read 6 tweets
3 Nov
APOC has proposed new campaign limits on to-candidate contributions following the court ruling striking down the limit. They argue adjusting the limits per inflation will meet the concerns raised by the case.

Was $500 per candidate per year. Would be $1500.

#akleg #akelect Image
The advisory opinion would be up for consideration (and changes) at the board's next hearing in Jan. 26, 2022.

Until then, it sounds like it's gonna be the wild west.
Oh, and here's a link to the advisory opinion. aws.state.ak.us/ApocReports/Pa…
Read 4 tweets
22 Sep
Dunleavy: "The goal was to make sure the system didn't collapse. ... Alaska's done a very good job."

He says the state's low death rate is evidence of the good job the state's done.

#akleg #akgov
Dunleavy then focuses a bunch on breakthrough cases: "The vaccinations aren't 100% foolproof, we know that now."

(We knew that then, dude)

#akgov
Dunleavy: "As society goes about their business, there's definitely an emergency going on in the hospitals."

He says the reason hospitals are overstrained is because of burnout akin to what every other industry has experienced in the pandemic.

#akgov
Read 46 tweets
20 Sep
In opposition to the Assembly's proposed mask mandate: "People are constantly picking their nose and touching stuff!"

#ancgov
"As a nurse, I always respected science but science…" something about the Bible.
Testifier who says the Assembly is ignoring the science: "Deaths are primarily among older people, such as myself. ... Back off the emotion."
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(