🧵3. 'Rich countries must deliver the $100 billion a year in new and additional public finance that they have promised — and commit to a new finance goal based on the real needs of those facing climate breakdown.. in excess of $1 trillion annually.'waronwant.org/news-analysis/…
🧵4. 'For the high emissions SSP3-7.0 scenario, the world is likely to pass 2C around 2046 (with a range of 2035-2062), while in the very high emissions SSP5-8.5 scenario it is 2041 (with a range of 2032 to 2053)'
🧵5. 'Nature conducted an anonymous survey of the 233 living IPCC authors last month and received responses from 92 scientists.. Six in ten of the respondents said that they expect the world to warm by at least 3 °C by the end of the century..' nature.com/articles/d4158…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. corals: 90% dead 2. unsurvivable heat 3. water scarcity hell 4. Antarctica collapses 5. global food insecurity 6. a million species extinct 7. tropics becoming uninhabitable 8. high risk of climate feedback doom
Only a postgrowth economy can avoid this now.🧵
🧵1 . Scientists agree: economic growth will make the extinction crisis of habitat destruction, toxic pollution and abrupt climate change difficult for humanity to survive decently, or perhaps even at all
🧵2. Mass media are virtually completely silent on what is essential for survival: rich countries rapidly and fairly degrowing their economies to aim for survival.
1. tropics becoming uninhabitable 2. a million species extinct 3. unsurvivable heat 4. corals 90% dead 5. water scarcity hell 6. global food insecurity 7. dire permafrost thaw 8. risk of climate feedback doom
Only a postgrowth economy can aim to avoid this.🧵
🧵1. “On our current trajectory, we are talking about climate change endangering roughly half of all plants and all insect species..
economic growth is just not viable as a mechanism for future prosperity. In fact, it is associated with future cataclysm.”cnbc.com/2021/02/19/deg…
🧵2. The most optimistic IPCC scenario based on a growth economy? Global temperature hits 1.6°C by 2050 then drops back by 2100. Scientists don't think this will happen.
Today at >417 ppm of CO2 it seems a clear majority of climate scientists think we'll very likely hit 1.6°C-2.5°C hell by mid-century followed by unthinkable 2.1°C-4.6°C by the 2090s according to the IPCC scenarios which are rooted in economic growth-as-usual. We need degrowth. 🧵
1. “On our current trajectory, we are talking about climate change endangering roughly half of all plants and all insect species..
economic growth is just not viable as a mechanism for future prosperity. In fact, it is associated with future cataclysm.”cnbc.com/2021/02/19/deg…
Please report that according to the IPCC, the global growth economy will cause extinctions at 1.5°C to 2°C of warming by 2032 then 1.6°C-2.4°C by 2050, but a new postgrowth paradigm could prevent such horror.
This silence is deadly.
Love from,
Ben
1. '6% of insects, 8% of plants and 4% of vertebrates are projected to lose over half of their climatically determined geographic range for global warming of 1.5°C, compared with 18% of insects, 16% of plants and 8% of vertebrates for global warming of 2°C'ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/s…
2. We can't rule out 2.5°C-3°C by 2050. People must be informed.
* 1.5C by 2027-2035
* 2C in the very high emissions SSP5-8.5 scenario: range of 2032 to 2053
BREAKING: world's scientists show that without immediate, total system change the activities of the global growth economy will lead us to mass death and extinctions by around 2045
🧵 1. It's not too late to totally change the global system hurtling us into mass extinction (as >20,000 scientists warn) by rapidly expanding the growing movement for a postgrowth economy to avoid a dead world of ruined habitats, but media remain silent.ecowatch.com/warning-to-hum…
2. 10%-20% of plants, insects, fish, birds, and mammals face extinction at 1.6-2°C due to abrupt climate change, but more species are also threatened by the habitat destruction & pollution of the global growth-inequality economy.