Some brief elaborations from the cutting room floor:
The essay talks about cross-subsidization at a few points. One fascinating form of cross-subsidization was that credit cards *changed who ultimately pays for an individual's use of credit.*
This had huge ramifications for small businesses, which are historically (and currently) horrifically capital constrained almost all of the time. They also have extreme difficulty in lining up traditional bank financing.
Credit cards let merchants opt-in to financing customers.
This is a supplement to traditional trade credit and it is far less capital intensive for the merchant, which themselves is quite possibly an SMB. In lieu of "You take delivery of the goods/services now but pay me in 90 days; I know (or certainly hope) you're good for it", ...
... the interchange (fee that the merchant pays to the credit card ecosystem for accepting cards) contains a large inducement to the issuer (the user's bank), making the bank happy to front its own capital with less underwriting and at cheaper terms than it would w/o interchange.
This is something I didn't appreciate prior to working in the industry, when I ran SaaS companies.
"Why are they so happy to give me more cards but won't approve any signature loans? Aren't those basically the same thing?"
Nope! CCs are systemically better for banks.
And thus, the existence of the credit card as a payment instrument (and the willingness of e.g. Amazon to accept it for my AWS bill) made some of the U.S.'s largest banks willing to give my business +/- $100k in credit without ever once meeting me or thinking about my SaaS.
We also see this with Buy Now Pay Later firms like e.g. Afterpay, Affirm, and Klarna.
They make credit ~completely free to the end-users of it, by asking the store to cover the cost of it through a higher-than-credit-cards interchange fee.
"Isn't that a step backwards? We had trade credit prior to credit cards."
It actually isn't, because without-loss-of-generality Sephora had to worry about credit quality, collections, defaults, etc back in the days when department stores managed their own credit accounts on prem
The BNPL firms take all of that and *finalize the sale at the point of purchase*, just like cash and credit cards do, which means that the merchant can book it as revenue rather than having to book it as deferred revenue, manage receivables, and all that jazz.
As you can tell, I geek out on this stuff. If there are other subjects you'd like me to geek out on, drop me a line here or at patio11@ the domain name above.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let me illustrate with a single paragraph why this is obviously the future of e.g. equities research:
Substack has made it incentive compatible for the world's various obsessed experts on various topics to hire themselves out to the Internet rather than hiring themselves out to e.g. financial intermediaries, and then they do the sort of deep work that experts do.
Also: holy me do I not want to be the investment banker who let a math error work its way into an IPO prospectus.
e.g. I owe the National Tax Agency (Japanese IRS) some math every year about all of my overseas assets, including those which did nothing in a year, and the process of collecting that information looks something like this:
Non-AngelList investment from 2012: get docs out of Dropbox, grep inbox to see if e.g. this is the one that I remember signing the docs about a corporate transaction this year or not, math math math, en-spreadsheet.
AngelList: download report on all, send to accountant, done.
A quirky feeling I've had on our covid-19 response is that some institutions have difficulty doing things which are *clearly* within our capabilities while others are pushing boundaries in their respective fields.
Isn't this just *obviously* the way the typical consumer's most important transaction should want to work? People are worried if they can make the math work. Me, less so, but that aside: few would say "Sign me up for the traditional sell/buy process!" with this as an option.
Ignoring the "new experience" thing which is product speak for "We stitched everything together in a web app", substantively:
1) You ask Opendoor for a quote. 2) They give you a hard quote and accept sale contingent on you winning target house. 3) You share pre-qual letter.
A "pre-qualification" letter is a document from a mortgage broker or originator that says "Contingent on you submitting a bunch of documentation, indicatively, we think we can underwrite you for a mortgage up to $X." Most common use is showing to seller to say "I could swing it."
Construction worker: Sensei, is that the last of them?
Me: Pardon?
CW: The kids. Are most of them [past the construction site or should I stay directing traffic]?
Me: I'm afraid I don't know; I came from the other way.
CW: Not from school?!
Me: No.
CW: You're not the English teacher?
Me: No, she's a young Filipina woman and I *gestures*.
CW: ... So you're not a teacher?
Me: Correct.
CW: Why the PTA badge then?
Me: ...
CW: OH I GOT IT. Sorry. Thanks.
And *sigh* the possibility of this dialog happening with a police officer is why I am very, very careful to put on my PTA badge prior to getting close to the school.
I'm doing some podcast editing (for the first time in almost five years!) and Descript ( descript.com ) is as close to magic as anything I've ever used.
There's some AI/ML under the hood which lets you edit audio as text. It's mindblowing.
Auto-generated transcript includes:
"Uh that's an interesting question, let me think, OK, [actual content]"
Highlight first part of answer, hit delete; it makes a seamless edit between the question and the contentful part of the response.
Not quite as good as an NPR editor but muuuuuuuuuuch cheaper and faster, and you really have to be familiar with Descript and listening closely to know it happened. (I periodically smile when I "catch" another podcast I listen to clearly using it.)