"Viral isolates will remain at the Wuhan Institute of Virology initially. Isolates, reagents and any other
products, will be made available to other NIH-funded researchers via applicable WIV and EHA Material Transfer Agreements and/or icensing agreements"
3. Cells (Page 203)
• Records are maintained for each of the cell lines regarding 1. the origin of the cell lines 2. when they were resuscitated 3. number of passages 4. all test results 5. any unique distinguishing growth behavior 6. any known genetic features.
4. Cell lInes (Page 203)
When receiving cell lines, lab members initially keep them isolated from other authenticated cell lines until mycoplasma testing & STR marker profiling is performed
All cell lines must be authenticated before commencing experimental work with them
5. Page 528
Recombinant and Wildtype Viruses and Mutant Derivatives.
All viruses will be validated and certified pure of contaminating viruses prior to use or shipment to other laboratories
6. Audit Trail (Page 527)
"UNC & WIV will implement an "audit trail" that tracks animals used in experimental investigations (Aim 3) from parents, through birth, shipment, experimentation, results, QC & analyses, providing outside researchers the ability to track experiments.."
7. Specific Aim 3 is on Page 512 and 272
Humanized mice for experimental infection for Specific Aim 3 (Page 512)
Specific Aim 3: Testing predictions of CoV inter-species transmission (Page 272)
8. RPPR reporting requirements
Research conducted at the following site(s) must be reported in your RPPR:
lnstitut Pasteur du Cambodge, CAMBODIA
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, THAILAND
Hanoi Agricultural University, VIETNAM
National Animal Health Laboratory, LAOS
9. Also:
San Pya Clinic, BURMA
Primate Research Center at Bogor Agricultural University, INDONESIA
Conservation Medicine, Ltd, MALAYSIA
"we would like to request prior approval for collecting non-human animal samples in 7 countries:
Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR , Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam" (Page 100)
1. Federal agencies like the US Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) as well as the NIAID were funding a remarkable array of research projects around the world..
2. "through a small cabal of civilian actors that in aggregate constituted a de facto bioweapons development program. In my job as data analyst for University of California, I had access to enough data to strongly suspect the existence of such a program"
He has a MA in Biophysics from the University of California, Berkeley. He worked as an analyst for thirty years in the University of California’s Office of the President.
2. The whistleblower just testified that following pressure & interference from mid-level & senior CIA leadership, the team's lab-leak findings were suppressed.
3. On August 17, 2021, the team was forced to reverse its stance and officially submit a conclusion stating they were unable to determine the origin, which formed the basis of the declassified ODNI report released later that month.
This is GOF research via experimental adaptation increasing pathogenicity which is DURC because it involves a listed high-risk pathogen and increases virulence via serial passage in a key reservoir host. i.e. DUCKS!
The Jiangsu researchers deliberately turned a relatively mild H5N6 avian influenza virus into a highly lethal killer of ducks through repeated serial passage in duck cells and live mallard ducks.
3. Good opportunity to boost my Video from 2013!
What originally caused zero deaths in mallards was rapidly adapted into a strain causing up to 100% mortality, massive viral replication in organs, and severe disease..
2. Prof Peter Shields, Professor of Medical Oncology at Ohio State University
“This paper does not add anything we do not already know, but selectively cites studies (and omits many others that refute the authors statements throughout) that leads the reader down the wrong path"
3. Prof Peter Shields (2)
“None of their mechanistic studies (selectively cited) has been validated as actual risk predictors in people, and the authors failure to recognize that leads to harmful conclusions."
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.