"Viral isolates will remain at the Wuhan Institute of Virology initially. Isolates, reagents and any other
products, will be made available to other NIH-funded researchers via applicable WIV and EHA Material Transfer Agreements and/or icensing agreements"
3. Cells (Page 203)
• Records are maintained for each of the cell lines regarding 1. the origin of the cell lines 2. when they were resuscitated 3. number of passages 4. all test results 5. any unique distinguishing growth behavior 6. any known genetic features.
4. Cell lInes (Page 203)
When receiving cell lines, lab members initially keep them isolated from other authenticated cell lines until mycoplasma testing & STR marker profiling is performed
All cell lines must be authenticated before commencing experimental work with them
5. Page 528
Recombinant and Wildtype Viruses and Mutant Derivatives.
All viruses will be validated and certified pure of contaminating viruses prior to use or shipment to other laboratories
6. Audit Trail (Page 527)
"UNC & WIV will implement an "audit trail" that tracks animals used in experimental investigations (Aim 3) from parents, through birth, shipment, experimentation, results, QC & analyses, providing outside researchers the ability to track experiments.."
7. Specific Aim 3 is on Page 512 and 272
Humanized mice for experimental infection for Specific Aim 3 (Page 512)
Specific Aim 3: Testing predictions of CoV inter-species transmission (Page 272)
8. RPPR reporting requirements
Research conducted at the following site(s) must be reported in your RPPR:
lnstitut Pasteur du Cambodge, CAMBODIA
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, THAILAND
Hanoi Agricultural University, VIETNAM
National Animal Health Laboratory, LAOS
9. Also:
San Pya Clinic, BURMA
Primate Research Center at Bogor Agricultural University, INDONESIA
Conservation Medicine, Ltd, MALAYSIA
"we would like to request prior approval for collecting non-human animal samples in 7 countries:
Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR , Malaysia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam" (Page 100)
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.
1. A truly stunning example of what is called an "ad hoc hypothesis", i.e. a secondary hypothesis added to a theory specifically to save it from being falsified when evidence for its original version is missing or contradictory.
2. They used a modeling framework called RELAX to claim that viruses like SARSCoV2 may already have the ability to infect humans whilst in their natural reservoir, meaning an intermediate host or long-term adaptation wouldn't leave the evolutionary footprints previously expected.
3. A classic post hoc justification for the absence of physical evidence by grant stuffed criminals, in short:
I couldn't find the evidence I said was required, so I've invented a theory that explains why the evidence I failed to find was never actually needed in the first place
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.
1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED
"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."
"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."
Unfortunately, there is no direct proof provided by Redfield in this new interview, but he cites engineering features, early data, and classified information.
🧵3. Summary of Redfield's Statements
(on SARS-CoV-2 Origins & Cover-Up)
He claims SARS-CoV-2 originated from GOF research in a lab and emphasizes a significant US role alongside China.
He views this as a major biosecurity failure with ongoing suppression of transparency.