I really do think it would be useful to have a straightforward essay debunking of the whole "billionaire funded transhumanist gender industry" conspiracy theory plus documentation of how various "respectable" GC feminists are using Bilek's conspiracy theories specifically.
Bilek's theories really do get around. She's not the only anti-trans conspiracy theorist but she's the most influential by far and her theories are picked up by both transphobic feminists, conservative Christians and outright Nazis and other fascists.
Plenty of transphobic feminists have no problem citing her outright. Janice Raymond's newest anti-trans book cites Bilek's writings extensively. Heather Brunskill-Evans also recently expressed support of Bilek and published writing on Bilek's blog.
Bilek's become a major influence on anti-trans feminism but also on organized transphobia in general. "Respectable" GC feminists can try to deny her influence all they want, it's there, it's easy to document and it's one of many things that links GC feminism to the Far Right.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A lot of liberals and leftists would rather believe that trans people, and trans women in particular, are hysterical and irrational when we describe what we deal with and what anti-trans activists actually want than examine their own transphobia and transmisogyny.
If you don’t trust trans people's ability to accurately perceive and name reality, name what our problems are, name how we're being harmed, guess what? You don’t see us as equals. Yeah, it's as bad as we say it is. We're smart enough to see what we're up against.
I hung out with anti-trans activists and other transphobic people for years. You think how some of them talk in public is bad, you should hear what they say when they're the only ones present. Everything trans people say about them is true. They're working for our elimination.
It’s come to my attention that a TERF I knew from the detrans rad fem community, Kitty Robinson, was one of the sources of Caroline Lowbridge’s transmisogynistic BBC article. Kitty posted about her involvement on her social media.
Kitty’s been in touch with Glinner, who wrote about trying to get a UK journalist to cover Kitty’s story but failed to because she’s American. Still, it’s possible that Glinner may have been the one who connected her to Lowbridge, who then used Kitty for “background research”.
Kitty has published an anthology of stories from AFAB people who were abused or assaulted by trans women and is using these stories as transmisogynistic propaganda. She solicited these stories using her blog on Tumblr.
#TransHate One of the reasons I could see this happening is that more established anti-trans activists/grifters could see her as competition, a newcomer encroaching on their turf. They wouldn't object to her hatred, they'll see her as a potential rival to take out.
Transphobes are also obsessed with purity and in their eyes certain qualities and experiences taint a person forever. Doing sex work is definitely one of those things. Other TERFs will use this to set themselves above Cade. They like putting others down, including other TERFs.
Not all TERFs will react this way. Some GCs on Ovarit are already hailing her as a hero. But based on what I've seen in the past, I'm guessing the Gendermapper and her friends won't be a fan, because of Cade's past doing porn and naming Buck as a "good trans person".
Prediction: Most US trans eliminationists aren't gonna claim Cade as one of their own because they're very, very anti-porn. They'll use her work in porn to distance themselves from her. They might even atttack her for her work because they blame porn for "making kids trans".
I've already watched trans eliminationists viciously attack Buck Angel for his work. They claim he's "grooming" kids and pushing them to transition by making porn and sex toys. The fact that Cade named him as an ally is going to work against her among many anti-trans activists.
I would not be surprised at all if a bunch of anti-trans activists dogpiled Cade and claimed she was part of the problem because she works as a porn star. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if they claimed she was actually a psy-op! They do love spinning conspiracy theories.
I want to say, as someone who spent years using my story as a detrans woman to promote anti-trans views and practices, that trans people are not being unreasonable by being concerned, upset or angry about how detransition is often framed by the media.
Transphobic detrans people go to the media to promote anti-trans theories, conversion practices, urge people to limit access to medical transition or discourage people from transitioning. I know this because I did this myself. Trans people aren't making this up or overreacting.
Believe trans people when we say something is harmful to us. The issue has never been about silencing people who detransition but about recognizing how some detransition stories can be used against trans people and how some detrans people are transphobic.
I know many transphobic detrans women from my old scene will dismiss trans people's concern's about the @60Minutes piece, act like we're overreacting, being too sensitive, etc. They will see the segment as being too "trans-friendly" if you can believe it.
I spent years as a transphobic detrans woman, hanging out with other detrans women with anti-trans views. I know firsthand how many transphobic detrans people hide their true views of trans people, misgender trans people in private and dismiss trans people’s views and concerns.
Transphobic detrans people refuse to acknowledge how they can hurt trans people or what kind of weight their stories carry in a transphobic society. They tend to believe that trans people already have too much power, "institutional capture" and all that bullshit.