Share this page!

Stephen Coughlin Profile picture
Twitter logo
7 Nov, 11 tweets, 2 min read
1 of 11) From the United Nations. Shut up and obey! When speaking of Marxist mass line enforcement narratives, Safa’s short Tweet hits all the buttons. It needs unpacking. It’ll be long.
2) GASLIGHTING: you have no right to an opinion if you’re not a state spokesperson, a state-approved scientist, or a member of the cadre of pundits who enforce mass line narratives.
3) DISCOURSE THEORY: You’re only allowed to listen to state pronouncements and state-approved and MSM/SM promoted “experts.” Other voices will be suppressed. How many qualified, competent scientists and doctors does Safa ignore (because they’ve been silenced)?
4) STATE SCIENCE: The state as god defines science & makes all pronouncements on science; that’s always correct because it said so. “Science” that enforces rights-abridging policies must be obeyed even when wrong in an arbitrary way. Marx’s “scientific socialism” set the pattern
5) The science narrative is an intentional attack on speech. The Left controls the academy, so they control who gets the PhDs. You’re not qualified to express political views because you don’t have a pol sci PhD.
6) You can’t criticize social trends because you don’t have a Ph.D. in sociology. Motivational? No psychology degree. This is how speech is suppressed in free speech jurisdictions. It’s a form of intimidation.
7) In many instances, the initiate language of social sciences allows for the scientizing ordinary opinions so that the manufactured “scientific” language can sustain the aura of higher thinking as it’s imposed on populations w the imputed authority of real science.
8) This is the basis of the “science” narrative from which Safa draws. Safa doesn’t want you to pray to any god of science; he wants you to pray to the god of science that derives authority from the state.
9) His god of science is the one that gets to change its mind and ignore emerging science that holds that the vax may be dangerous and may not work. Real science never changes its “opinion,” it adapts to new data that meets specific evidentiary and repeatability criteria.
10) So, why are ERs full w an explosion of off-season illnesses? Who’s calling in sick for C19 at around 85 to 95%? What of myocarditis and miscarriages? Where is the science behind vaxing 5-year-olds? What of INFORMED consent?
11) When does arbitrary wrongness and promotion of it become disinformation in an active measures campaign when lives are at stake? If the state makes science a religion, is giving the vax to 5-year-olds like sacrificing them to Moloch?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Stephen Coughlin

Stephen Coughlin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @S_Coughlin_DC

Stephen Coughlin Profile picture
15 Oct
1) John's comments are heavily grounded in Church Dogma. When a pope wanders from his basis of authrotiy, when he wants to "shake it up," he is argualbly of base. Pastor Aeternus states the authority always present since Jesus gave Peter the authority in Matthew 16:19. Let's see:
2) From Chapter 4 Paragraph 6 seems to have been written w Francis in mind: "For the Holy Spirit was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine but that, by his assistance, they might religiously guard . . .
3) . . . and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith transmitted by the apostles."

Then comes Chapter 4, Paragraph 9: “Therefore, faithfully adhering to the tradition received from the beginning of the Christian faith, to the glory of God our savior, . . .
Read 9 tweets
Stephen Coughlin Profile picture
10 Oct
A key takeaway - There ARE people who think this way in high places. Very anti-God, typically Socialist, Mitterrand was. Not new, this sounds just like the Fabian Socialists from turn of last century - George Bernard Shaw or example? H G Wells? Still on mission.
2) From H G Wells: "The men of the New Republic will not be squeamish, either, in facing or inflicting death, because they will have a fuller sense of the possibilities of life than we possess. They will have an ideal that will make killing worthwhile." - Anticipations, 1902.
3) From G B Shaw: “You must all know half a dozen people at least who are no use in this world, who are more trouble than they are worth. Just put them there and say Sir, or Madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence? . . .
Read 5 tweets
Stephen Coughlin Profile picture
6 Oct
1) For those who recognize the initiate code (signaling), a dispositive argument can be made that Francis’ 2000 Encyclical Fratelli Futi was a victory lap celebrating the lodges’ victory of the Alta Vendita over the Church.

lifesitenews.com/wp-content/upl…
2) It even signals the French Revolution just like Ratzinger, his refs to 1789, when calling for the raising of the (Church’s) Bastions, Fratelli Futi replaces Catholic theology for that of a movement formally condemned by the Church more than any other.

vatican.va/content/france…
3) Consider, while Fratelli Futi mentions the Holy Spirit only 3 times, liberty (6), equality (15) and fraternity (55) are mentioned a combined 76 times. In fact, paragraphs 103 to 105 are bundled under a section titled “Liberty, Equality and Fraternity.”
Read 5 tweets
Stephen Coughlin Profile picture
5 Oct
A friend undertook the translated subtitles. I've been planning to put something together on this and will soon. Habermas is second generation Frankfurt School. There is reason to think that this concept was first tried in prototype at Vatican II -

2) I know what you’re thinking: “Vatican II, WT*, that’s a reach, even for you. But consider, it was well known at Vatican II that microphones were turned off for those who opposed the periti and there were other events as well that map with Habermas’ DT.
3) Then, consider that in 2005, Habermas coauthored a book with Cardinal Ratzinger titled THE DIALECTICS OF SECULARIZATION: ON REASON AND RELIGION. In the US, the Jesuit Ignatius Press published it never once suggesting that Habermas was a Marxist.
Read 13 tweets
Stephen Coughlin Profile picture
27 Sep
1) Not a coincidence. Why are so many on the left completely unaware of the eugenics nexus to the Fabians or that the Soviets had harsh "antiparisite" laws? The Left has never been a party of the workers, but rather of elites controlling workers - it's a "road to serfdom".
2) It's always been about the "vanguard," never the proletariat. Think of that vanguard as Thanos (death in Greek) from Marvel. Pieper's "Platonic Nightmare"? You only need enough of the hoi poloi at the bottom of the triangle to service those at the top.
3) There is nothing novel about what's going on, and the science is as old as Plato's from the Phaedo (which is NOT modern peer reviewed science). A few screen shots from "ReRemembering the MisRemembered Left" on the Fabians (or is that Fabii?).

unconstrainedanalytics.org/report-re-reme…
Read 8 tweets
Stephen Coughlin Profile picture
15 Aug
1) As I recall, Feldman was a principal author of the Afghan Constitution. When asked to review the draft Constitution in 2005, I warned and in fact was sent to Doha, that if that Constitution was ratified, it was one that designed for the Taliban to be in charge.
2) It was about a 50 page constitution. I noted that the 1st 3 articles nullified everything that followed. The 3 Articles follow:

Article 1 [Islamic Republic]. Afghanistan is an Islamic Republic, independent, unitary and indivisible state.
3) Article 2 [Religions]. (1) The religion of the state of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is the sacred religion of Islam

Article 3 [Law and Religion]. In Afghanistan, no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of the sacred religion of Islam.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @S_Coughlin_DC has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @S_Coughlin_DC!

Read all threads by @S_Coughlin_DC

:(