HonestReporting Profile picture
Nov 7, 2021 17 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Not again. Another antisemite at the @BBC.

Nasima Begum is an arts council-supported charity advocate and trustee who has also worked occasionally as a presenter for @BBCRadioManc.

She is also a rabid and vocal antisemite, with a LONG history of hate-filled social media posts. Image
Back in May, acting on a lead by @GnasherJew, @HonestReporting's @emanumiller shared how then-BBC journalist Tala Halawa had a history of antisemitic tweets.

Halawa was fired shortly thereafter.
honestreporting.com/journalist-tal…
Today, @GnasherJew has again revealed a number of deeply disturbing social media posts by another BBC employee, @nasimabee, dating back years.

This sparked further investigation by HonestReporting. These are our findings:
In May 2021, @nasimabee invoked a modern version of a classic antisemitic trope, and tweeted that Zionists' have a "hold on mainstream media." Image
That month, she described in an Instagram post attending a protest against the @BBC, accusing it of favouring Israel and laughably alleging that "mainstream news outlets were saying nothing" against Israel. Image
In a June 2021 Twitter rant, @nasimabee characterised Israel as "killing innocent people and terrorising them daily," which are bad enough, but also included the blatant lie that Israel was "bombing masjid alaqsa." Image
In fact, police forces responded to Palestinian rioters who hurled bricks and Molotov cocktails, used fireworks as weapons, at one stage setting the Temple Mount alight when a tree caught fire.

Stun grenades is not "bombing" in any sense of the word. honestreporting.com/media-miss-rea…
Of course, these claims are totally devoid of the context of the decades-long Palestinian campaign of terror Israel faces, as well as the attempts Israel makes to avoid civilian casualties despite Hamas and others hiding behind civilians, using them as human shields.
Such claims are the realm of one-sided advocacy at best, and hate-filled delegitimisation at worst. Either way, they are not becoming of someone presenting a radio show for a national broadcaster, @BBC.
There's more. Much more.

In 2017, writing on Facebook, @nasimabee attempted to justify the killing of Israelis:

"Innocent Israeli deaths? How can you be innocent and Israeli when you've settled on someone else's land and kicked them out. Nah." Image
In 2010 and 2011, @nasimabee declared support for the Intifada.

The Second Intifada saw countless attacks against Israeli civilians by Palestinian terrorists, with hundreds of civilians murdered in shootings, stabbings and bombings on Israeli buses, cafes, and streets. ImageImage
In 2012, @nasimabee cheered on a threat by Anonymous to seize "any and all websites deemed to be in Israeli cyberspace" in response to Israel's military campaign against Hamas in Gaza.

(Threat made in video: ) Image
The threat against "any and all" Israeli websites is pertinent given recent reports that Iranian-linked hackers leaked details of members of Israel's LGBT community.

Anonymous' vile, indiscriminate threat was made not against the IDF but against *all Israeli websites." Image
In 2012, Begum even expressed gratitude that Akram Rikhawi, a Palestinian convicted of assisting a terror attack, succeeded in a hunger strike and had his prison release brought forward six months. Image
As the Associated Press and New York Times reported at the time, Rikhawi was convicted of transporting suicide bombers. He was serving a nine-year sentence.

Just to be clear, he was an accomplice in either murder or attempted murder.
nytimes.com/2012/07/24/wor…
It's clear that @nasimabee's animus is not against any Israeli policy, but against Israel itself.

As she said herself, "Israel is just the most vile ever thing to exist." Image
Over the years, @nasimabee has repeatedly posted about Jews and Israel in disparaging and antisemitic terms.

For example, in 2011, she said that "the Jewish population [have] implemented the same [genocide] on Palestine for years." Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with HonestReporting

HonestReporting Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HonestReporting

Jan 21
1/8
These headlines tell you everything the media doesn’t want you to notice.

AP and the BBC aren't just reporting what happened; they’re quietly framing how you’re supposed to understand it.

Look closely. ⬇️ Image
2/8
AP says Israel claims, “often with little evidence,” that UNRWA staff are tied to Hamas.

That line does a lot of work by quietly telling readers not to believe what comes next.

Except the evidence exists. And it always has. Image
3/8
The BBC doesn't just report here, but adjudicate sovereignty.

By declaring “occupied East Jerusalem” as fact in the headline, the BBC isn’t describing a dispute.

It’s unilaterally drawing the borders of another country’s capital. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 7
1/10 🧵
Did you know the recent Israel-NGO framework story is being covered very differently depending on the outlet?
Most headlines focus on "restrictions" and "limits on criticism."

But what's the actual policy trying to achieve – and why do some groups comply while others don't? Let's break down the facts calmly.Image
2/10
In late 2025, Israel rolled out a new registration/vetting system for humanitarian orgs in Gaza & West Bank.

Goal (per official statements): Prevent wartime infiltration by militants into aid groups.

Most organizations signed on quickly. A smaller number raised concerns.

Question: What would you consider reasonable safeguards in active conflict zones?
3/10
Israel reports ~85%+ compliance rate – meaning the vast majority of NGOs met the criteria without issue.

The rules target specific red flags like:
- Documented support for armed groups
- Denial of documented atrocities (e.g., Oct 7)
- Active promotion of boycotts/lawfare against Israel
- Coordination with designated enemy orgs

Not blanket "no criticism" – but focused security checks.Image
Read 10 tweets
Jan 6
1/
These Gaza photos were circulated as “Christmas joy for children.”

But they were released after Christmas, did not document a children’s event, and were presented in a way that invites a specific emotional reading.

Here’s what the images show – and what they don’t. 📸 Image
2/
The images were distributed via Getty on December 30 – four to five days after Christmas.

That timing matters.

They were released not during the holiday itself but when editorial demand for emotive, year-end Gaza imagery peaks. Image
3/
The photos were sourced from Anadolu, Turkey’s state-aligned news agency.

This doesn’t invalidate the images.

But it does situate them within a defined political and media ecosystem – not a neutral freelance release.
Read 9 tweets
Dec 29, 2025
🧵 Dishonest Reporter of the Year Awards 2025 🎉

1/ It’s awards season… and while Hollywood hands out trophies for acting, we’re honoring the people who pretended to do journalism. Presenting: Dishonest Reporter of the Year 2025.

Let's find out the winners 👇Image
2/ 🏆 Winner: The BBC
No outlet worked harder this year to prove that “publicly funded” doesn’t mean “publicly accountable.” Truly a masterclass in bias, blunders & backpedaling.
honestreporting.com/exposed-leaked…
3/ Remember that Gaza documentary narrated by… a Hamas minister’s teenage son? The one whose mom got paid? Yeah — that really happened. BBC: Bold. Brave. Or just… 🤦‍♂️
Read 14 tweets
Dec 28, 2025
1/
Since Oct. 7, 2023, major media outlets have repeatedly reported casualty figures from the Hamas-run Ministry of Health (MoH) in Gaza as if they were independently verified facts -- with little to no skepticism.

Let's break down the distorted narratives. 🧵 Image
2/
Headlines citing MoH death tolls were widely amplified without attribution to Hamas, allowing a terrorist org’s figures to become the dominant narrative in global reporting. Image
3/
This has resulted in repeated blood libels in media coverage -- blaming Israel for high civilian death tolls without critically examining the reliability of the source data.
Read 12 tweets
Dec 25, 2025
1/
🌍Are Israeli women living in a dystopian reality where, year by year, they are being stripped of their most basic rights?

No, because the data and imagery used by @CNN to support that narrative distort reality and mislead audiences. 🧵 Image
2/
📸 The cover image features a “Handmaid’s Tale”-style protest from nearly three years ago against legal reforms -- not a current reflection of women’s rights in Israel. Context matters. Image
3/
📊 CNN relies on the Women Peace & Security Index (WPS Index) without questioning its methodology. The index blends unrelated indicators (e.g., cellphone use, conflict exposure), not a pure gender-rights measure.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(