Nasima Begum is an arts council-supported charity advocate and trustee who has also worked occasionally as a presenter for @BBCRadioManc.
She is also a rabid and vocal antisemite, with a LONG history of hate-filled social media posts.
Back in May, acting on a lead by @GnasherJew, @HonestReporting's @emanumiller shared how then-BBC journalist Tala Halawa had a history of antisemitic tweets.
Today, @GnasherJew has again revealed a number of deeply disturbing social media posts by another BBC employee, @nasimabee, dating back years.
This sparked further investigation by HonestReporting. These are our findings:
In May 2021, @nasimabee invoked a modern version of a classic antisemitic trope, and tweeted that Zionists' have a "hold on mainstream media."
That month, she described in an Instagram post attending a protest against the @BBC, accusing it of favouring Israel and laughably alleging that "mainstream news outlets were saying nothing" against Israel.
In a June 2021 Twitter rant, @nasimabee characterised Israel as "killing innocent people and terrorising them daily," which are bad enough, but also included the blatant lie that Israel was "bombing masjid alaqsa."
In fact, police forces responded to Palestinian rioters who hurled bricks and Molotov cocktails, used fireworks as weapons, at one stage setting the Temple Mount alight when a tree caught fire.
Of course, these claims are totally devoid of the context of the decades-long Palestinian campaign of terror Israel faces, as well as the attempts Israel makes to avoid civilian casualties despite Hamas and others hiding behind civilians, using them as human shields.
Such claims are the realm of one-sided advocacy at best, and hate-filled delegitimisation at worst. Either way, they are not becoming of someone presenting a radio show for a national broadcaster, @BBC.
There's more. Much more.
In 2017, writing on Facebook, @nasimabee attempted to justify the killing of Israelis:
"Innocent Israeli deaths? How can you be innocent and Israeli when you've settled on someone else's land and kicked them out. Nah."
In 2010 and 2011, @nasimabee declared support for the Intifada.
The Second Intifada saw countless attacks against Israeli civilians by Palestinian terrorists, with hundreds of civilians murdered in shootings, stabbings and bombings on Israeli buses, cafes, and streets.
In 2012, @nasimabee cheered on a threat by Anonymous to seize "any and all websites deemed to be in Israeli cyberspace" in response to Israel's military campaign against Hamas in Gaza.
(Threat made in video: )
The threat against "any and all" Israeli websites is pertinent given recent reports that Iranian-linked hackers leaked details of members of Israel's LGBT community.
Anonymous' vile, indiscriminate threat was made not against the IDF but against *all Israeli websites."
In 2012, Begum even expressed gratitude that Akram Rikhawi, a Palestinian convicted of assisting a terror attack, succeeded in a hunger strike and had his prison release brought forward six months.
As the Associated Press and New York Times reported at the time, Rikhawi was convicted of transporting suicide bombers. He was serving a nine-year sentence.
This set of maps is designed to promote the lie that Israel has been stealing land from "Palestine" since 1946.
Shame on @thetimes for including it in an "explainer."
Here's an explanation of what these maps really show. 🧵
1/ Map 1: "1946"
The first map purports to show “Historic Palestine,” and is filled with red, indicating that it is one self-governing state. In the period preceding British rule, the region was administered by Turkey and stretched into modern-day Lebanon and Syria. The area at the time was never a sovereign entity in its own right, and the boundaries shown in such a map do not reflect the boundaries of the region as administered by the Ottomans, nor as they appeared under previous rulers.
2/ The yellow "Jewish land" here evidently denotes areas where Jews lived. By that logic, then, surely there should be patches of red in later maps indicating the presence of Arabs living in Israel. By conflating Jews in this map with Israel in later maps, the map fundamentally misleads with regard to the issue it supposedly illustrates: the borders of a "Palestinian" state.
1/ A blood libel disguised as a tragic war feature. The @nytimes “trauma of Gaza’s children” piece is built on distortions— from photos staged at propaganda sites (spot the red & white gate) to casualty figures framed to demonize Israel. We see you, NYT. 🧵
2/ NYT says Israel has “killed 18,000 under 18.” The trick? They lump in 16–17-year-old militants with toddlers to paint all as “children.” Hamas’ own ministry admitted most deaths were combat-age males. NYT cherry-picks to make Israel look like baby-killers.
3/ Endless evidence—intel, videos, eyewitnesses—shows Hamas using civilians as shields. The NYT has admitted it before. Yet here, such facts are reduced to “Israeli claims.” Why? Because nothing, not even evidence, can interrupt its vile “Israel kills kids” narrative.
She's beloved worldwide.
That’s why Ms. Rachel’s viral misinformation is so dangerous—it doesn’t just entertain millions, it shapes how the next generation sees the world.
With 16M subscribers and billions of views, Ms. Rachel is called the “Mr. Rogers” of our time.
But her foray into Gaza activism isn’t as innocent as it seems.
She shared this viral photo of a Gazan child, later revealed to have a congenital condition, and vowed she wouldn’t work with anyone who hadn’t spoken about Gaza.
1/ @TIFF_NET decided to pull an Oct. 7 documentary from its lineup this year.
Why? It claimed it needed permission from Hamas to publish bodycam footage of the massacre.
Let’s take a closer look at the dangers of giving a terror group editorial control 🧵
2/ Hamas live-streamed Oct. 7.
When perpetrators document their horrific crimes for the world to see, they don’t get to decide whether they continue to be shared.
No one questioned when outlets published images taken by photographers of the crimes of Oct. 7 from inside Israel.
3/ This isn’t new.
When Nazi propagandist & filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl threatened to sue @simonwiesenthal for using her films without permission, Rabbi Marvin Hier famously offered to pay her… in Reichsmarks.
1/ Despicable from @nytimes.
When the terrorist is Palestinian and his victims are Israeli Jews, the whitewash begins.
Zakaria Zubeidi — unrepentant mass murderer — gets the hero treatment.
Crimes blurred. Victims erased.
Let’s break down this vile feature 🧵
2/ @nytimes paints Zubeidi as a victim – a repentant figure.
Reality: he’s never chosen peace.
From the start, his path was terror.
NYT spins it as if violence was his last resort, when it was always his first choice.
@nytimes 3/
NYT calls Ariel Sharon’s visit to the holiest site in Judaism “provocative” and the “spark” for the Second Intifada.
Fact: Yasser Arafat planned it months earlier. Sharon’s visit was the excuse.
1/ .@SkyNews' chief correspondent spent 2 weeks in the West Bank, covering the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
With all that time and resources, it’s remarkable how much he still got wrong.
Sky News filmed it. We’ll tell you what they didn’t. 🧵
2/ Sky News repeatedly downplays Israel’s security concerns.
This year alone, Israel’s security service has recorded over 2,000 attacks – from shootings to firebombs.
That’s the reality they brushed aside.
3/ Jews in the West Bank aren’t a monolith.
They live there for ideological, economic & social reasons.
So why did Sky News pick one man from the hardline Yitzhar settlement to stand in for them all?