Nasima Begum is an arts council-supported charity advocate and trustee who has also worked occasionally as a presenter for @BBCRadioManc.
She is also a rabid and vocal antisemite, with a LONG history of hate-filled social media posts.
Back in May, acting on a lead by @GnasherJew, @HonestReporting's @emanumiller shared how then-BBC journalist Tala Halawa had a history of antisemitic tweets.
Today, @GnasherJew has again revealed a number of deeply disturbing social media posts by another BBC employee, @nasimabee, dating back years.
This sparked further investigation by HonestReporting. These are our findings:
In May 2021, @nasimabee invoked a modern version of a classic antisemitic trope, and tweeted that Zionists' have a "hold on mainstream media."
That month, she described in an Instagram post attending a protest against the @BBC, accusing it of favouring Israel and laughably alleging that "mainstream news outlets were saying nothing" against Israel.
In a June 2021 Twitter rant, @nasimabee characterised Israel as "killing innocent people and terrorising them daily," which are bad enough, but also included the blatant lie that Israel was "bombing masjid alaqsa."
In fact, police forces responded to Palestinian rioters who hurled bricks and Molotov cocktails, used fireworks as weapons, at one stage setting the Temple Mount alight when a tree caught fire.
Of course, these claims are totally devoid of the context of the decades-long Palestinian campaign of terror Israel faces, as well as the attempts Israel makes to avoid civilian casualties despite Hamas and others hiding behind civilians, using them as human shields.
Such claims are the realm of one-sided advocacy at best, and hate-filled delegitimisation at worst. Either way, they are not becoming of someone presenting a radio show for a national broadcaster, @BBC.
There's more. Much more.
In 2017, writing on Facebook, @nasimabee attempted to justify the killing of Israelis:
"Innocent Israeli deaths? How can you be innocent and Israeli when you've settled on someone else's land and kicked them out. Nah."
In 2010 and 2011, @nasimabee declared support for the Intifada.
The Second Intifada saw countless attacks against Israeli civilians by Palestinian terrorists, with hundreds of civilians murdered in shootings, stabbings and bombings on Israeli buses, cafes, and streets.
In 2012, @nasimabee cheered on a threat by Anonymous to seize "any and all websites deemed to be in Israeli cyberspace" in response to Israel's military campaign against Hamas in Gaza.
(Threat made in video: )
The threat against "any and all" Israeli websites is pertinent given recent reports that Iranian-linked hackers leaked details of members of Israel's LGBT community.
Anonymous' vile, indiscriminate threat was made not against the IDF but against *all Israeli websites."
In 2012, Begum even expressed gratitude that Akram Rikhawi, a Palestinian convicted of assisting a terror attack, succeeded in a hunger strike and had his prison release brought forward six months.
As the Associated Press and New York Times reported at the time, Rikhawi was convicted of transporting suicide bombers. He was serving a nine-year sentence.
1/10 🧵
Did you know the recent Israel-NGO framework story is being covered very differently depending on the outlet?
Most headlines focus on "restrictions" and "limits on criticism."
But what's the actual policy trying to achieve – and why do some groups comply while others don't? Let's break down the facts calmly.
2/10
In late 2025, Israel rolled out a new registration/vetting system for humanitarian orgs in Gaza & West Bank.
Goal (per official statements): Prevent wartime infiltration by militants into aid groups.
Most organizations signed on quickly. A smaller number raised concerns.
Question: What would you consider reasonable safeguards in active conflict zones?
3/10
Israel reports ~85%+ compliance rate – meaning the vast majority of NGOs met the criteria without issue.
The rules target specific red flags like:
- Documented support for armed groups
- Denial of documented atrocities (e.g., Oct 7)
- Active promotion of boycotts/lawfare against Israel
- Coordination with designated enemy orgs
Not blanket "no criticism" – but focused security checks.
1/ It’s awards season… and while Hollywood hands out trophies for acting, we’re honoring the people who pretended to do journalism. Presenting: Dishonest Reporter of the Year 2025.
Let's find out the winners 👇
2/ 🏆 Winner: The BBC
No outlet worked harder this year to prove that “publicly funded” doesn’t mean “publicly accountable.” Truly a masterclass in bias, blunders & backpedaling. honestreporting.com/exposed-leaked…
3/ Remember that Gaza documentary narrated by… a Hamas minister’s teenage son? The one whose mom got paid? Yeah — that really happened. BBC: Bold. Brave. Or just… 🤦♂️
1/ Since Oct. 7, 2023, major media outlets have repeatedly reported casualty figures from the Hamas-run Ministry of Health (MoH) in Gaza as if they were independently verified facts -- with little to no skepticism.
Let's break down the distorted narratives. 🧵
2/ Headlines citing MoH death tolls were widely amplified without attribution to Hamas, allowing a terrorist org’s figures to become the dominant narrative in global reporting.
3/ This has resulted in repeated blood libels in media coverage -- blaming Israel for high civilian death tolls without critically examining the reliability of the source data.
1/ 🌍Are Israeli women living in a dystopian reality where, year by year, they are being stripped of their most basic rights?
No, because the data and imagery used by @CNN to support that narrative distort reality and mislead audiences. 🧵
2/ 📸 The cover image features a “Handmaid’s Tale”-style protest from nearly three years ago against legal reforms -- not a current reflection of women’s rights in Israel. Context matters.
3/ 📊 CNN relies on the Women Peace & Security Index (WPS Index) without questioning its methodology. The index blends unrelated indicators (e.g., cellphone use, conflict exposure), not a pure gender-rights measure.