Nasima Begum is an arts council-supported charity advocate and trustee who has also worked occasionally as a presenter for @BBCRadioManc.
She is also a rabid and vocal antisemite, with a LONG history of hate-filled social media posts.
Back in May, acting on a lead by @GnasherJew, @HonestReporting's @emanumiller shared how then-BBC journalist Tala Halawa had a history of antisemitic tweets.
Today, @GnasherJew has again revealed a number of deeply disturbing social media posts by another BBC employee, @nasimabee, dating back years.
This sparked further investigation by HonestReporting. These are our findings:
In May 2021, @nasimabee invoked a modern version of a classic antisemitic trope, and tweeted that Zionists' have a "hold on mainstream media."
That month, she described in an Instagram post attending a protest against the @BBC, accusing it of favouring Israel and laughably alleging that "mainstream news outlets were saying nothing" against Israel.
In a June 2021 Twitter rant, @nasimabee characterised Israel as "killing innocent people and terrorising them daily," which are bad enough, but also included the blatant lie that Israel was "bombing masjid alaqsa."
In fact, police forces responded to Palestinian rioters who hurled bricks and Molotov cocktails, used fireworks as weapons, at one stage setting the Temple Mount alight when a tree caught fire.
Of course, these claims are totally devoid of the context of the decades-long Palestinian campaign of terror Israel faces, as well as the attempts Israel makes to avoid civilian casualties despite Hamas and others hiding behind civilians, using them as human shields.
Such claims are the realm of one-sided advocacy at best, and hate-filled delegitimisation at worst. Either way, they are not becoming of someone presenting a radio show for a national broadcaster, @BBC.
There's more. Much more.
In 2017, writing on Facebook, @nasimabee attempted to justify the killing of Israelis:
"Innocent Israeli deaths? How can you be innocent and Israeli when you've settled on someone else's land and kicked them out. Nah."
In 2010 and 2011, @nasimabee declared support for the Intifada.
The Second Intifada saw countless attacks against Israeli civilians by Palestinian terrorists, with hundreds of civilians murdered in shootings, stabbings and bombings on Israeli buses, cafes, and streets.
In 2012, @nasimabee cheered on a threat by Anonymous to seize "any and all websites deemed to be in Israeli cyberspace" in response to Israel's military campaign against Hamas in Gaza.
(Threat made in video: )
The threat against "any and all" Israeli websites is pertinent given recent reports that Iranian-linked hackers leaked details of members of Israel's LGBT community.
Anonymous' vile, indiscriminate threat was made not against the IDF but against *all Israeli websites."
In 2012, Begum even expressed gratitude that Akram Rikhawi, a Palestinian convicted of assisting a terror attack, succeeded in a hunger strike and had his prison release brought forward six months.
As the Associated Press and New York Times reported at the time, Rikhawi was convicted of transporting suicide bombers. He was serving a nine-year sentence.
Israel struck Iran preemptively.
Was it legal under international law? Here's what the rules actually say 👇
International law doesn’t ban preemptive strikes, but it does make them hard to justify.
They must be a response to a real, immediate threat, not a guess or grudge.
The standard? A 19th-century case called the Caroline Affair.
It's still the gold standard for when preemptive force is legal.
Modern military lawyers use it like a checklist, and it’s hard to pass.
How the media manufactured a “genocide.”
Zach Goldberg breaks down how the world’s most serious crime became a political weapon—and how media outlets helped it happen. 🧵
Mentions of “genocide” in relation to Israel have exploded—far beyond how the media treated actual, recognized genocides in history.
In The New York Times, coverage linking Israel and genocide was:
➤ 9x higher than for Rwanda
➤ 6x higher than for Darfur
Let that sink in.
“Why hasn’t there been a Palestinian state?”
Let’s talk about the peace deals that could’ve made it happen—and why they were rejected.👇
1️⃣ 1947 – The UN Partition Plan
Palestinians were offered statehood with the most fertile land.
Arab leaders said no. Then 6 Arab states attacked Israel.
Israel survived.
2️⃣ 1967 – Khartoum Summit & UN Resolution 242
After the Six-Day War, the UN proposed land-for-peace.
The Arab League responded:
“No peace. No recognition. No negotiations.”
End of conversation.
📰 No casualties. No bullet wounds. No injuries. No massacres.
But that's not how the media reported it...🧵
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's drone footage showed zero casualties, the IDF confirmed it, but media outlets still ran Hamas quotes as fact.
Why the influx of disinformation? Because Hamas is desperate to sabotage an aid system that bypasses its control, so it invented atrocities, and the media helped legitimize them.
🚚 Aid finally makes it to Gazans—but the headlines still miss the real story.🧵
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation successfully delivered aid to thousands of Gazans. Israel only fired warning shots to keep order—no injuries, no deaths. Media spin? “Israel opens fire.”
Then Gazans stormed a flour stockpile. Hamas fired into the crowd, killing five, and boasted about it on Telegram. Media spin? “Deadly break-in at UN warehouse.” No mention of Hamas hoarding the aid or pulling the trigger.
Despite what this photo caption says, it does not show Dr. Alaa al-Najjar, the mother of children killed in an airstrike.
The photo in @guardian actually shows al-Najjar's niece (left) and brother-in-law with an as yet unidentified woman. 🧵
We know this is the niece as she is identified as such in a @Reuters video interview from inside the hospital.
Despite this, Reuters is currently selling the erroneously captioned photo that The Guardian used.
So is this Dr. Alaa al-Najjar in this @Reuters photo, a pediatrician who wears a niqab and is so strictly religious that she was allowed to train in medicine, and still had time to give birth to 10 children in little more than 11 years?