Three things will disproportionately influence your career:
- how good you are at your job
- how fast your industry / town / country / network is growing
- how good your boss is.

Most people only take action on the first one and leave the other two to chance.

(thread)
This thread is about spotting bad bosses (I'll give you 8 red flags) and how to avoid working for them.

If you prefer reading it in post form, it's here:
getrevue.co/profile/dellan…
While there might be good reasons to work in an industry / town that isn’t growing, there are no good reasons for spending time under a bad boss.

It will severely limit your career growth, drain your energy, and affect your personal life.
Some bad bosses are selfish psychopaths, but most are well-meaning yet bad at their job. Most got there because they were good at their previous role which didn’t involve managing people or because they were loyal – but neither will make them a good boss.
A well-meaning boss is arguably more dangerous than a psychopath one – with the latter, at least, you know that he can hurt you. But the former can harm you too, for example by wasting a couple of years of your career…
…(often the early ones, those with the largest impact on your trajectory and thus lifetime outcome) or by making you undergo frustrating situations that will teach you the lesson that it’s not worth caring – a lesson that might become a handicap for life.
Here are some non-obvious red flags that you might be dealing with a bad manager:

1) He is vague
2) His career stagnated
3) His subordinates’ career stagnated
4) His subordinates are in a bad mood
5) He isn’t ambitious nor sets ambitious goals
6) He never works overtime or always works overtime
7) He procrastinates or avoids addressing important questions
8) He doesn’t have boundaries or respect his subordinates’ boundaries

Let’s see them one by one.
He is vague. He will create misunderstandings and grey areas, and you will be on the receiving hand. You will misunderstand what he wants, you will not be told what matters, and as a result you will lose a lot of time and gain a lot of frustration.
His career stagnated or he is never in a good mood. The former means he didn’t understand what matters in business. The latter means that he didn’t understand what matters in life. Either way, working for him, you will learn the wrong lessons or fail to learn the important ones.
(You might think: what if I’m not ambitious? In that case, does it matter if my boss’ career stagnated?

It might.
While there are exceptions, a boss whose career has stagnated is a red flag for a lack of management skills, and if so, you will be on the receiving end of unclear tasks, unrewarded efforts, chronic lack of budget, and other frustrating experiences.
This doesn’t mean that managers whose career stagnated do lack management skills – there are plenty who are great – but it does mean that it’s a red flag, and you should further ascertain whether it stagnated due to lack of ambition or lack of skills.)
His subordinates’ stagnated, and so will you. Yes, you might be the exception, but even then, you’d do much better working for a boss whose median subordinate doesn’t stagnate.
(Note that by “stagnated” I do not necessarily mean their career – if you care about personal growth instead, look if their personal growth stagnated.)
His subordinates are in a bad mood, and so will you, if you end up working for him.
He doesn't set ambitious goals. OTOH, you prob do not want to work for someone so ambitious that he will hurt your personal life. OTOH, you don't want to work for someone that sets excessively conservatives goals: he will lack the windfall to reward you or create room for growth.
He never works overtime or always works overtime. In most businesses, every now and then there will be problems or opportunities requiring urgent attention. A boss that never works overtime could be a boss that ignores them, …
…and a boss that always works overtime could be a boss that isn’t able to prioritize or delegate, and thus will fail to work on the important things. You don’t want to work for either.
(Note, again, the “could.” A red flag doesn’t mean that it’s bad. It means that it could be problematic, and if it’s a problem you care about, you want to dig deeper to know whether there indeed are problems. Red flags aren’t conclusive and yet not to be ignored.)
He procrastinates or avoids addressing important questions. Problems grow the size they need for them to be addressed, and a boss that procrastinates is a boss that will have large problems on his hands. When they will finally explode, you’ll be within the blast radius.
He doesn’t have boundaries or respect his subordinates’ boundaries. A boss without boundaries is a boss without values, …
…and one that doesn’t respect his subordinate’s boundaries is one that won’t let you have values. Either way, someone you might want to avoid, proportionally to how important your values are.
Of course, there are exceptions, as with any rule of thumb. But they do not mean that following the rules of thumb above isn’t useful nor that ignoring them comes with risks.
And of course, few bosses have no red flag at all. Is it worth working for one that only has one or two? Your call. But do not hope, “maybe the red flag is wrong;” instead, ask yourself, “will I be okay with it?”
The best way to probe for these red flags is during the interview process. Unlearn the idea that an interview that doesn’t convert into a job offer is a failure

If you discover that the work environment won’t be a good fit for you before you start working there, that’s a success
Always, always! talk with your potential future boss. Ask open-ended questions such as “what does a day working here look like” and follow-up with questions such as “what will my tasks look like once I’ve finished the onboarding period.”
Look for red flags of vagueness and avoidance. Then, ask questions such as “how often do people work overtime here” and “who was the last person that left and why.” Probe for the red flags above.
If you have ambitions, mention them with your future boss. If he feels threatened or doesn’t care or any other problem, you want to know about it now. Ask him, “what will it take to get there and, if I do all of that, how likely is it that I will succeed?”
Of course, you cannot overly trust his answer, but regardless of its contents, the way he answers it (with care? with dismissal?) will give you great insights into his nature.
If you have boundaries or ambitions, make sure you mention them with him. If they won’t be met, the right moment to know is before you get hired.
Many believe that it’s more important to “land the job” to “get a foot into a good company / industry” and that “if there’s any problem, I’ll just jump ships” but…
…but the reality is that people working for bad bosses always stay too long: they’re afraid of what a 3-months job experience would look on their CV or didn’t want to look like fickle.
And they are right, it won’t look great! Working for a bad boss is a trolley problem where you lose whether you quit early or remain longer. The moment you have to decide whether to pull or push the lever, you already lost.
Hence the importance of appropriately probing whether one’s future boss will be a bad one, even if it means asking uncomfortable questions, and even if it might mean not landing the job.
Of course, if you’re already working for a bad boss, I suggest you immediately cut your losses by looking for another job – inside your company or outside of it (though beware of the former – bad bosses cluster).
Interview a few of your potential future colleagues – you want to know who you will work with *and* what working for your future boss looks like. Are they tired and resigned? Or cheerful and energetic? Are they satisfied? What’s the one thing that frustrates them the most?
You can either formally interview with them or spend some time with them by the coffee machine or at the coffee opposite the street.
Feel free to walk by the office when most people are getting out, stopping a few people, and explaining that you’re interviewing with the company and wanted to know how it feels like to work there. Yes, it’s awkward, but working for a bad boss is awkwarder.
To sum it up
Most people underestimate the likelihood of ending up working for a bad boss, mostly because they define it as “selfish psychopath” and not as “someone who will hinder my professional and personal growth.”

This leads them to underestimate the need to interview their boss.
Instead, candidates should proactively and extensively probe for red flags during their interviews, front-loading any problems and misalignments.
If they really like the company but their future boss exhibits multiple red flags, it’s sometimes possible to side-step it by getting hired by another team of the same company.
But never start working for a bad job with the idea of “it will only be a while” – it most often isn’t. Or, “it won’t be this bad” – it will often be worse.
A last thought. In school, we learn that if we work hard, good things will happen to us. In a company, if we work hard, good things might happen. A great boss ensures that they do [1], and that’s something worth proactively looking for.
Here is the thread in long form, in case you want to share it with someone who would benefit: getrevue.co/profile/dellan…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Luca Dellanna

Luca Dellanna Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DellAnnaLuca

5 Nov
Germany today:
139 COVID deaths.

Germany one year ago today:
145 COVID deaths.

Vaccination rate: 67%.

Any thoughts on why?
I can only think of a much more diffuse virus, but perhaps there’s something else?
(By “today” I mean “yesterday”, ops)
The other option would be a different accounting, is any German aware of any change on this?
Read 5 tweets
3 Nov
So, let’s say that it’s 2025, we forgot about COVID, and there’s an outbreak of a novel virus in a foreign country.

We’re in the same situation as January 5th, 2020.

Given our experience with COVID, what should we do? Which policies, etc?
“Because we survived COVID even though wounded by restrictions, next time we shouldn’t use restrictions.”
I’m afraid that because we learned the true lesson that semi-closing borders late didn’t work, we will have learned the wrong lesson that closing borders early won’t work.
Read 4 tweets
1 Nov
One year ago today, the first Roam Book was published.

One year later:
- many roam books
- roam newsletters
- a dedicated website: roam-books.com

A thread on what they are and what they can become

First of all, what's a Roam Book (or rBook for short)?

It's a book published in @roamresearch format. This enables it to become much more than a book.

Some examples on the homepage of roam-books.com or in the quoted tweet.

I created the rBook format in November 2020 with the publishing of the first rBook, "Ergodicity" (gum.co/ergodicity/ann…), and then followed it with a second rBook, "This is Management"
gum.co/roambook/anniv…
Read 10 tweets
26 Oct
Imagine you were an alien. On your planet, there aren’t schools. From your spaceship, you spend some time observing one of ours.

What would you guess schools are for?

(a thread on education)
I bet that education wouldn’t be the first of your hypotheses. After all, schools deliver much better on other metrics.

For example,

2/N
Did you ever notice that most degrees are of the same length regardless of the complexity of the underlying field, and that some subjects are obsolete, as if their purpose was to employ teachers rather than teach useful skills?

3/N
Read 11 tweets
25 Oct
15h software debugging for 1.5T of metal on public roads is an extraordinary feat, only a genius or a psychopath could achieve that
I imagine the logic, “in 15h we couldn’t find any problem, this must mean our testing process is good enough and the software is ready for public beta”
“But there’s no alternative!”

There is: pay drivers specifically trained for testing autonomous vehicles. Like almost everyone else in the industry is doing.
Read 4 tweets
18 Oct
I hope it's a deception, but I fear it's a misconception.
The latter is more dangerous.

It reminds me of a critical article I read a few years ago, that explains a lot of economic policies.

(thread)

This article has an interesting thesis: the false belief that prices have an allocative function but merely a redistributive one explains most of the economic BS heard over the past decades.

An example in the next tweet 👇

(🇮🇹 source: Noisefromamerika.org/articolo/perch…)
One implication of the false belief above is that taxes and minimal wages don't affect the price of labor and thus employment. Under such false belief, of course taxes and minimal wages are a no brainer! 🤦‍♂️
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(