A ton of talks on crypto infrastructure stuff going in Lisbon. @solana@SolanaConf#solanabreakpoint#breakpointlisbon Technology is moving at breakneck speed that it's really tough to keep current! Even more difficult to be involved in the action early.
@solana@SolanaConf There is always an ongoing tension between innovation and usability. Innovation thrives in permissionless and decentralized environments. Unfortunately, this free-for-all makes usability difficult because usability involves building facades that hide useful abstractions.
The conventional approach is to continue to layer technology on top of each other, thus creating a user experience accessible to the majority. Present-day complexity in cryptocurrency is a consequence of exponential innovation.
It is always the case that those intrepid enough to navigate the territory while the railroad is still being built are those most likely to gain the biggest upside. Exponential technological growth leads to outsized opportunities for the pioneers.
A problem with the majority is that their experience of the hivemind is the mobile device. Unfortunately, a mobile device doesn't have the kind of transparent framework that allows you to get your hands dirty in the innards.
BTW, a very non-intuitive concept in the crypto space is the concept of a liquidity provider. It turns out that this concept that originates from the need to automate liquidity is essential to bind together complex decentralized applications.
A fundamental difficulty for decentralized application is the distribution of payment of services. If every dapp can only be viable through the receipt of 'energy', how then can you build useful systems that integrate complex workflows such that every service is compensated?
The problem with platforms like marketplaces and social networks is that compensation is monopolized by the administrators and not the producers. This has led to the extreme inequality we find in this world.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nobody is mentioning that one of the biggest NFT payoffs happened yesterday. Over $500m was paid to thousands of people who previously minted (or registered) a domain name on the Ethereum Name Service ($ENS). coindesk.com/business/2021/…
This is an early glimpse as to how producers can benefit when their platforms seek the securitization of their governance.
The problem with platforms such as marketplaces (uber, airbnb) and social networks is that they fail to properly compensate their producers. The majority of the gains trickle up to the administrators of the platform and not its individual producers. medium.com/intuitionmachi…
It's insanity that the primary tool we have for controlling the economy is through the manipulation of interest rates. This has led to the utter bonehead idea that if you lower the interest rates for buying homes and paying for college that you make both more affordable.
Homes and higher education become more affordable when through become more efficient in their creation. Yet here we are, we have yet to demolish government institutions like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Sallie Mae.
If you just look around you, we have all kinds of financial instruments that were invented in the 1950s that promise all kinds of payoffs that they cannot possibly deliver. It should be obvious to anyone that you cannot fundamentally change something by changing its looks.
The form of language (i.e. its syntax) does not tell you anything about its meaning. An ancient human language cannot be deciphered without a corresponding Rosetta Stone.
That's because languages are just frozen social habits of communication by their users. Social habits become norms via information propagation and replication. Not unlike a virus propagating its RNA.
This however implies that within human languages there are commonalities as a consequence of the common interactions with humans and their neighbors.
The innovation found in biology is a consequence of a development process that is absent of a centralized mind. This has benefits in that it leverages massively parallel processes. It can explore possibilities beyond that what a sequential mind can do.
However, the lack of a centralized mind also has its own downsides. Biology isn't able to consolidate its discoveries as efficiently as that of an integrated mind. A good analogy to explain this is refactoring found in software development.
In software development, rapid development eventually leads to the accumulation of what is known as technical debt. As technical debt increases, the developers refactor the code so as to reduce the debt. There is a mindful method of creation and destruction.
@pmddomingos It's also the same ignorance that leads to wild expectations when the algorithm games the results. Ignorance like naivety is a two-sided blade.
@pmddomingos The progress we make in deep learning is a consequence of our overall ignorance about general intelligence. There are many alternative ideas on cognition developed by other fields. But these were done without the benefit of computational models.
@pmddomingos It is the combination of empirical AI (i.e. Deep Learning) and theoretical formulation (i.e. Cognitive science, biology, complexity science etc) that lends us a more systematic strategy towards discovery.
The purpose of civilization isn't to make the law of the jungle the primary directive for all human activities. Its objective is to harness enough resources for humanity so we live our lives as if we were children.
The nations states that are successful in today's civilization are those that invest heavily in their children. The modern economy is exponentially becoming more complex and you need citizenry who are adaptive and open-minded to new kinds of endeavors.
An adult who knows only the law of the jungle habitually seeks self-preservation over adaptability. This is why we see the politics of today where there is a great fear by one side that their identity will be extinguished.