These people defending Garland's inaction are like the LemonLyman club who would defend Josh Lyman's *secret plan* to fight inflation.
If Garland had empaneled a Grand Jury, we'd know it, just like we know when Cy Vance does.
If Garland or the FBI had interviewed key Congressional conspirators, we'd know it, because these people love complaining to Fox every time something bad happens to them.
If Garland or the FBI had interviewed key Congressional conspirators, we'd know it, because these people love complaining to Fox every time something bad happens to them.
If Garland were serious about holding everybody accountable for trying to overthrow the government, we wouldn't have ACTUALLY JUDGES complaining that the sentence recommendations FROM THE DOJ'S PROSECUTORS are too light.
In short, the distance between the people who say "Garland has a secret plan to prosecute Trump for insurrection" and the people who say "Trump be reinstated as president with JFK Jr as his running mate" is not as wide as both groups would have you believe.
Whatever, eventually Garland *will* charge Bannon with contempt and all these people will say "SEE!!" while ignoring the weeks long lag, how he emboldened people like Flynn to ignore subpoenas, and the fact that after the *charge* it'll be like a year before the *trial*.
Then it'll go to appeal, the Dems will lose the House. Republicans will end the Select Committee, and *THEN* these people will say "don't worry" and tell us to wait for Garland to bring criminal charges against the conspirators.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
