The 140 second portrait-mode open source free film is still in its early stages as an art form.
It flips every aspect of the Hollywood model of the 20th century.
Big screen → small screen
Landscape → portrait
120 mins → 140 seconds
Big budget → zero budget
Scarce distribution → free distribution
US-centric → global
View with crowd → view solo
Many have commented on this, and I’ve written about this before, but the full displacement of Hollywood by TikTok, Twitch, YouTube, and co is not yet complete.
Even Netflix and Amazon Studios may be seen as transitional forms, as we move to AI-generated video and VR everything.
The pseudonymous economy is preferable to ritualistic announcements of immutable characteristics. It would be more accessible for the disabled as well.
It’s not everyone’s ideal outcome, but it’s far better than this.
The thesis of the Sovereign Individual holds up well. But there are three major countertrends.
The Individual Sovereign, and Xi Jinping in particular.
The Sovereign Collective, the leverage of nomadic groups.
The Autonomous Robot, as drones also change the logic of violence.
The Individual Sovereign
Technology matters - but so do founders. A sufficiently motivated founder can change the direction of technology. And Xi Jinping has refounded the Chinese state as a formidable, centralized, militaristic surveillance machine. reuters.com/investigates/s…
The Individual Sovereign is a problem for the Sovereign Individual. A single man at the helm of a total surveillance state is just a different thing than the US establishment. The latter may well *want* to crush free speech & free markets, but lacks the state capacity to do so.
See the @rootsofprogress review of “Where’s My Flying Car” for more on the Henry Adams Curve, and the modern tendency to assume that even clean energy production is somehow bad.
Numism, or the study of coins, puts a third Leviathan at the center of it all. The most powerful force in the world is considered to be neither god, nor the US military, but encryption. sotonye.substack.com/p/if-einstein-…
You can cut these as past, present, and future respectively. People who pay at least lip service to God, people who worship the State, and people who focus on the Network.
Breaking out that third category may be key — as it’s global, and differs in key ways from the others.
International corporate law is much fuzzier than we think.
If a company in Brazil tries to buy one in Bangladesh, just getting the list of obligations on both sides is nontrivial. The deal may go through a US or PRC intermediate, a hub that has relations with both sides.
That is, there may not be that many legal precedents for Brazil/Bangladesh acquisitions, but there will be some for Brazil/US & US/Bangladesh. Or perhaps Brazil/PRC & PRC/Bangladesh.
So you go through that hub. It’s the lowest risk strategy. Till ETH and smart contract chains…