Thread by @GidMK

Wow. The key FLCCC paper on their main protocol has been retracted after understating the true number of deaths in the treatment group by ~78%
retractionwatch.com/2021/11/09/bad…

From the hospital where this work was conducted:

"...a careful review of our data for patients with COVID-19...only 25 of 191 patients (13.1%) received all 4 MATH+ therapies, and their mortality rate was 28%" rather than 6.1% cited in the article

journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.117…

"This would be an incorrect calculation of a hospital mortality rate, but might explain the incorrect number of 6.1% in Table 2. Using this incorrect mortality
rate to compare with the published reports and claim a “75% absolute risk reduction” is thus an incorrect conclusion"

Note: this isn't related to ivermectin, but it is something of a bad sign, especially as this would indicate that the MATH+ protocol had a death rate somewhat higher than other treatment modalities

(It isn't related to ivermectin because at the time that the patients mentioned above were treated ivm was not on the MATH+ protocol)