was not planning on reading a 72 page book tonight but i'm a sucker for punishment
The question to the government, if one remembers (I do! life was painful!) was simple:
- Did it collect #COVID19 data on a NEIGHBOURHOOD level on a weekly basis?
Seemed like basic information about a deadly pandemic the public would want to know.
So I asked.
Less than AN HOUR LATER, the BC Centre for Disease Control had a response: it didn't "produce a regular data file", but did once, and was balancing privacy concerns.
Which is not super satisfying, but a) was true, b) provided quickly.
You know, basic competent stuff.
The BC Centre for Disease Control communications person got a response from the Provincial Health Service Authority quickly — they could tell a reporter basic information about a deadly pandemic!
Now all that was left to do was get government signoff.
Five days pass.
While the BCCDC and the PHSA were okay allowing me know how basic data in a deadly pandemic was collected, the government did not approve that response.
I publish a story with what I have.
several internal emails are sent confirming that non-partisan health officials have not had their attempt to provide me information approved by the government communications apparatus
it's all very fun
11 days pass since I asked the straightforward question on whether the most transparent government in North America collects neighbourhood data.
I've received no response yet, but now deputy ministers and the deputy provincial health officer are trying to answer.
Very fun!
After more emails and back and forth, they seem ready to provide the data to me!
Unfortunately, under this government, pretty much every response about the pandemic requires approval from the very highest levels of power.
And "b" isn't on board.
Dr. Henry communicates her disapproval on May 5, 14 days after I first asked whether the government collects data about a global pandemic on a neighbourhood level.
On May 6, the Vancouver Sun publishes a leaked report with that very data.
And that's where our story ends, as I alert the government to the fact the data has been leaked, and they start to plan a press conference.
In summary:
- The government does not allow non-partisan, arms length health departments to provide media straightforward information about a deadly pandemic without political approval
- This is a byzantine process that can last weeks with no clear outcome
- It sucks
Most of this was blindingly obvious for many, many months, but this was an illuminating look at how the sausage gets made.
Or more accurately, doesn't.
Thanks (I think) to @ty_olsen for making this FOI request.
anyways time to find a beer
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Council then reconvened for one minute, where it was explained the public would have another 15 minutes to provide feedback, as day three of this public hearing turns into day four.
At a time when every other province has much lower per capita case counts, or a trendline that's been going significantly down, B.C.'s rolling average went up 13%, with active case counts and hospitalizations essentially static.
Not great!
Most of this is due to another big surge in Northern B.C., which is seeing transmission similar to Alberta and Saskatchewan at the moment.
But none of the other four health authorities saw a real decline this week, and a couple saw a gentle rise.
"Look at my phone," says John Horgan, as he defends the province's FOI proposals.
he turns his smartphone to media
"I play Scrabble, I have Spotify ... I know what the weather is going to be like in Prince Rupert."
what...what is happening
Horgan also says that the FOI fee has not been settled, and in fact there may be no fee, and then argues what he says are good parts of the proposal that have nothing to do with the fee.
this is just such an awkward retreat
For context: the B.C. government says the opposition makes FOI requests for screenshots of Ministers' home screens, and it's an abuse of the system.
The question was about the proposed $25 fee for all requests.
The story quotes a UBC mathematician who’s helped with official modelling and says these numbers are hard to measure, and I’ve mentioned a few times the limits of B.C.’s IT.
But I think it’s more germane that the government said something was accurate when it clearly wasn’t.
Overall a moderately encouraging week in B.C. for reducing transmission, with the rolling average down 5% and active cases essentially stable, despite ongoing weird data corrections in different regions
The B.C. government provided the figures for one day of the number people still in hospital originally for #COVID19, but who no longer count to the daily total.
So we can't really chart that, but here's what it looks like in comparison for one day.
Here's a tiny story about everybody's favourite show: British Columbia, pandemic data, and government transparency.
Today's episode: the case of the 99% vaccination rate!
It took some time, but the government now breaks down % of people vaccinated in a pretty detailed way: not just by local health area, but by age and by health region.
And that publicly available data says that 99% of people 18-29 in Coastal Health have gotten a vaccine dose.
99% of people 18-29 in Vancouver Coastal Health vaccinated would be an amazing story, and an unbelievable success for public health officials in convincing a demographic that across the world has been a bit slower to get a shot.