BREAKING: as both temperatures & CO2 emissions soar towards record levels by 2023 and industrial trawling and mining wreck the sea bed, climate scientists fear the ocean will soon be unable to provide Earth's largest long-term carbon store
🧵1. Abrupt climate change has 'a "worrying" effect' on the ocean's ability to lock away carbon. If global temperatures increase to levels predicted, the ocean 'will not be able to provide what is currently Earth's largest long-term carbon store'. bbc.com/news/science-e…
🧵2. We're heading for 1.6°C-2°C by the 2030s as corporations d governments openly plan together to increase fossil fuel production in the 2020s. We can't survive the ocean destruction being driven by economic growth. A postgrowth economy is the only way.cnbc.com/2021/07/20/co2…
🧵3. We will hit 1.5°C for the first time any year now. We are in danger of 2°C by 2032-2051 and look unlikely to avoid 2.5°C in either the short or long term. We must aim for degrowth, but media like liberal capitalist Guardian remain silent, of course.

theguardian.com/environment/20…
🧵4. Bottom trawling is a practice used by commercial fisheries around the world in which a large heavy net is dragged along the ocean floor to scoop up everything in its path resulting in long-term, far-reaching consequences in the deeper ocean and beyond.news.mongabay.com/2014/05/trawli…
🧵5. We'd need profound political and economic system change to stop destructive deep sea mining, industrial fishing, and greenhouse gas emissions as well as deforestation, logging, road building, pesticide use, etc

Degrowth is the answer ignored by media.newscientist.com/article/mg2513…
6. 'Deep sea mining is a growing subfield of experimental seabed mining that involves the retrieval of minerals and deposits from the ocean floor found at depths of 200 meters or greater.'

This must not be allowed to expand.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_sea_…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ben See

Ben See Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClimateBen

6 Nov
Capitalism 2027

1. corals: 90% dead
2. unsurvivable heat
3. water scarcity hell
4. Antarctica collapses
5. global food insecurity
6. a million species extinct
7. tropics becoming uninhabitable
8. high risk of climate feedback doom

Only a postgrowth economy can avoid this now.🧵
🧵1 . Scientists agree: economic growth will make the extinction crisis of habitat destruction, toxic pollution and abrupt climate change difficult for humanity to survive decently, or perhaps even at all

* 1.5°C horrors by 2025-2030

The answer? Degrowth:cnbc.com/2021/02/19/deg…
🧵2. Mass media are virtually completely silent on what is essential for survival: rich countries rapidly and fairly degrowing their economies to aim for survival.

* new scientific consensus:

1.6°C-2.4°C hell by 2050 if we don't progress away from growth.yaleclimateconnections.org/2021/08/key-ta…
Read 12 tweets
5 Nov
1.6°C by 2030-2050

1. tropics becoming uninhabitable
2. a million species extinct
3. unsurvivable heat
4. corals 90% dead
5. water scarcity hell
6. global food insecurity
7. dire permafrost thaw
8. risk of climate feedback doom

Only a postgrowth economy can aim to avoid this.🧵
🧵1. “On our current trajectory, we are talking about climate change endangering roughly half of all plants and all insect species..

economic growth is just not viable as a mechanism for future prosperity. In fact, it is associated with future cataclysm.”cnbc.com/2021/02/19/deg…
🧵2. The most optimistic IPCC scenario based on a growth economy? Global temperature hits 1.6°C by 2050 then drops back by 2100. Scientists don't think this will happen.

'Such a relatively short excursion above 1.5°C might not trigger the worst outcomes'😱yaleclimateconnections.org/2021/08/key-ta…
Read 6 tweets
4 Nov
Today at >417 ppm of CO2 it seems a clear majority of climate scientists think we'll very likely hit 1.6°C-2.5°C hell by mid-century followed by unthinkable 2.1°C-4.6°C by the 2090s according to the IPCC scenarios which are rooted in economic growth-as-usual. We need degrowth. 🧵
1. “On our current trajectory, we are talking about climate change endangering roughly half of all plants and all insect species..

economic growth is just not viable as a mechanism for future prosperity. In fact, it is associated with future cataclysm.”cnbc.com/2021/02/19/deg…
2. IPCC scientists survey:

>75% of respondents said they expect 2.5C, 3C, 3.5C, or 4C by 2100:➡️nature.com/articles/d4158…

1.6C by the 2030s/2040s is unavoidable with economic growth-as-usual.

1.6-2.4°C is hell and with growth it's very likely by 2050:
⬇️
Image
Read 4 tweets
3 Nov
Remember:

1. the tropics may become uninhabitable if global warming reaches 1.6°C-1.7°C

2. the best case scenarios with economic growth: 1.6°C-1.7°C by the 2040s

3. media refuse to explain the postgrowth alternatives that have been well understood by economists for decades

🧵
🧵1. “On our current trajectory, we are talking about climate change endangering roughly half of all plants and all insect species..

economic growth is just not viable as a mechanism for future prosperity. In fact, it is associated with future cataclysm.”cnbc.com/2021/02/19/deg…
🧵2. 'The tropics could become uninhabitable if we don’t limit global warming to less than 1.5°C'

We're somewhere between intermediate, high, and very high emissions scenarios: 2°C-2.4°C by 2041-2060; 3°C possible

IPCC unlikely best case scenario: 1.6°C
newscientist.com/article/227035…
Read 6 tweets
1 Nov
🧵Dear Journalists & Editors,

Please report that according to the IPCC, the global growth economy will cause extinctions at 1.5°C to 2°C of warming by 2032 then 1.6°C-2.4°C by 2050, but a new postgrowth paradigm could prevent such horror.

This silence is deadly.

Love from,
Ben
1. '6% of insects, 8% of plants and 4% of vertebrates are projected to lose over half of their climatically determined geographic range for global warming of 1.5°C, compared with 18% of insects, 16% of plants and 8% of vertebrates for global warming of 2°C'ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/s…
2. We can't rule out 2.5°C-3°C by 2050. People must be informed.

* 1.5C by 2027-2035

* 2C in the very high emissions SSP5-8.5 scenario: range of 2032 to 2053

* 1.6C-2.4C by 2050

carbonbrief.org/analysis-what-…

AR6 report:
ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
Read 5 tweets
1 Nov
Remember:

1. this global growth economy will cause climate chaos at 1.6°C-2.1°C by the 2030s/2040s as it

* destroys Arctic ice
* cuts crop yields by 10%-50%
* makes sea level rise surge
* drives 10%-50% of species extinct

2. postgrowth economists show this hell is avoidable🧵
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(