Darth Autocrat (Lyndon NA) Profile picture
Nov 12, 2021 24 tweets 8 min read Read on X
1/🧵
🚨::: Keywords, and Beyond! :::🚨

It’s a standard industry term.
Almost everyone that has heard of SEO knows of “keywords”.

The problem is, the general perception of keywords is out of date!

Worse - there’s no alternative, and few additional terms!

#SEO #DarthAutocrat Image : Heading : “Keywords, and Beyond!” Darth Vader in
2/*

Originally, Keywords were THE thing.
Meta Keywords and string matching.

Other SEs came along, things evolved, Meta-Keywords basically died.

Yet the term remained.
Though how they are used has evolved,
the way they are used for research hasn’t really.
3/*

As competition for “keywords” got harder,
new terms came to the fore:
* Head term
* Longtail
* And then Mid-tail joined in
As more businesses went online, and more sites, pages and content appeared - it became harder to rank for the shorter “keywords”.
4/*

Which brings us “up to date”.

Which, in my opinion - is still limited, sucky and ineffective!

But, before we go further,
let’s make sure everyone is reading off the same page,
and understands “where we are now” :D

(Note the measurements in the pictures!)
5/*

Based on data from @Moz (rounded off),
* Head terms = 20%
* Mid terms = 10%
* Longtail terms = 70%

Head terms are often the most costly, competed, with the greatest volume of matches and ambiguity.
Longtail are the most specific and greater converting Chart : References the % of queries that match each length t
6/*

Head terms.

Primary terms tend to be 1 or 2 words,
often Nouns or Verbs.
These may be ambiguous, and have “mixed SERPs”.
Includes many Navigational/Brand queries,
and may also cover certain Entity Informational queries
Shoes, Pizza, Running, Twitter etc. Chart : References the % of queries that match each length t
7/*

Primary with Secondary terms tend to be 2 to 5 words,
Nouns/Verbs with Prepositions
or Nouns/Verbs with Adjectives/Adverbs.

Often more Informational and/or Commercial
queries, with less ambiguity (fewer mixed SERPs).
Shoe shops near me, Best LED TV etc. Chart : References the % of queries that match each length t
8/*

Primary, Secondary and Tertiary terms tend to be 4+
words, Nouns & Verbs, Prepositions &
Adjectives/Adverbs (even full sentences).

Many Informational and some Commercial intent queries are of this type.
Why are Oxford shoes called Oxfords? Chart : References the % of queries that match each length t
9/*

The longer the term you target,
the more distinctive, specific and unambiguous it is,
the fewer pages you should need to produce to be relevant for it,
and less internal/inbound links. Chart : References content and link needs by term length typ
10/*

The shorter, less detailed the term you want to rank for, the more pages you will need,
with more internal links and inbound links pointing to it.
(Head/Hub pages) Chart : References content and link needs by term length typ
11/*

Each page is meant to target a main term, or set of terms (see "group")

If you produce “topic expanding” content,
you will naturally have pages that include the same “root” term.
(Not really cannibalising!) Chart : References Cannibalisation of target terms. Focus is
12/*

Each page is meant to target a specific thing.
This can be by Variant, Target or Intent.
Variants differentiate by features.
Targets differentiate by audience attributes.
Intents by nature/purpose. Chart : References content and link needs by term length typ
13/*
Consider the following queries:

* get ink out
* get pen ink out
* how to get pen ink out
* how to get pen ink out of shirt
* how to get red pen ink out of a shirt

Are the SERPs different for each?
(Note really!)
14/*

As you can see, the number of words may change - the nature and topic do not.
The order of results may shuffle, but the majority of results are the same pages.

Note the SERP changes, which version triggers ads and where ... and the Featured Snippets.
15/*

Also notice that we didn’t really need “how to” in the query?
We can imply it by removing it - quite safely, as there’s very little chance for ambiguity.
(There isn’t a lot of content about “why to remove ink” etc. :D)

Shows how/why researching competition is important!
16/*

Ambiguous Queries may mean mixed-intent SERPs
(so you may see Commercial and Informational etc.)

Targeting longer queries may mean lower volumes,
but also means less competition,
including advertisers!
17/*

Query: womens eco friendly red clutch handbag london

google.com/search?q=women…

Keyword : handbag
Keyword phrase : clutch handbag
Target terms : Women(s) and London
Variants : eco friendly and red
Intent : Implied (product, so it’s primarily commercial) Image : References the content of the tweet, with lines indi
18/*

[Womens eco friendly red clutch handbag london]

This could be shifted from implied-commercial,
towards informational (com+info),
by including “which” or “best”

Or the results could be refined by adding Season, Brand, Material, Size, differentiators (sequins?) etc.
19/*

Next up is "nature" (classification).

We know that Google classifies queries.
We don’t know if that includes types/specifics of Intent,
but we do know it covers Adult and YMYL!

Certain words/phrases will trigger different behaviour (poss. inc. anti-spam algos)
20/*

Then we have “groups”.

Some words have abbreviations and/or variant spellings etc.
There’s also synonyms, similar terms and descriptors.

So any “keyword” may actually cover a range of variant phrases.

(And a page may show for several "phrases", and their variants!)
21/*

[womens eco friendly red clutch handbag london]

eco friendly ?= sustainable | recycled | green

red ?= ‘’ | scarlet | burgundy | strawberry
22/*

There’s more to keywords!

Keywords are a bridge -
between the User and the Search Engine!

You need to understand Nature, Intent, Parts of Speech, and how they pertain to Journey Stage, SERP Features etc.

You need to see ways to utilise that information in your content
23/*

Change your research, the docs and reports you make.
Do NOT just include Term, Volume & CPC!

Include:
Primary term(s)
Term group
Intent of each term
Intent triggers (or if implied)
Journey stage
Synonymous words/phrases
Terms that make a difference (or not)
Terms to avoid
24/*

You will find SEO life gets much (much!) easier when you capture/attach the additional information.

From prioritising targets through to ideation, identifying internal link targets etc.

So, give it a go…

Go Beyond “Keywords”. Image : A small Darth Vader with a glass dome in the bottom

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Darth Autocrat (Lyndon NA)

Darth Autocrat (Lyndon NA) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @darth_na

Apr 10
.
:: This is NOT what you are meant to be doing! ::

This is a shining example of the flawed logic,
and Keyword Lead approach that I keep on saying to avoid!

If you're agency does either of these,
look for better!

>>>

#SEO #Keywords #ContentCompendium

Via @jonoalderson
>>>

Yes - "Keywords" are important,
as is knowing Search Volume and Competition Level/Strength.

But you should not be creating pages based around such things.
Instead - you should be basing it around Prospects/Audience, and their Needs/Wants/Expectations.

>>>
>>>

Where's the Buyer Guides?
Where's the Range Comparisons?
Where's the Spec/Tech Sheets?
(and at least 5 other content formats!)

These are the pages that help prospects to decide
not only what to buy,
but to buy it from you!

They appear for earlier-stage searches.

>>>
Read 13 tweets
Apr 4
.
🚨:: Should you be writing that? ::🚨

Okay, this one may ruffle some feathers,
but hopefully it will drive home some of the reasons that some sites get hit, or don't rank etc.

Sadly, the answer is to often - NO

>>>

#SEO #ContentCreation Image - top down depiction of a plain-paper note book, open on a wooden table top. On the left hand page, is some hand writing; large letters, 1 word per line. Reads: "Should you be writing that". On the right, is a single character - a large, heavy question mark.
2/?

It's such a simple question ...
... but so many get the answer wrong.

The result is - a huge number of people producing content, about topics/subjects that they don't really know.

And it shows!

How?

Because those people do "research" before they "write"!

>>>
3/?

Note the "quotes" around:
* Research
* Write

That's because - as much as some would like to believe otherwise,
looking at the top N results,
then rewording them,
is Not Research nor Writing!

(And I know - some tools help you do just that!)

>>>
Read 23 tweets
Mar 31
1/?
🚨:: Google and SEO ::🚨

Something that's become readily apparent,
is that a large percentage of peoples
understanding of SEO
is somewhat skewed,
and they don't see/understand it from Googles perspective.

>>>

#SEO Image
2/?

In the most simplest view,
G see's 3 main aspects to SEO:
1) Crawling
2) Indexing
3) Ranking

And of those 3 aspects,
Google would prefer if people only focused on the first 2;
Crawling and Indexing.

G see Ranking as their job.

>>>
3/?

The more you do around Ranking,
the more you can be seen as manipulating, or abusing, or getting spammy etc.

Instead, SEO should focus on:
* ensuring content can be accessed by bots
* G is able to parse (and render) the content
* G knows what should be indexed

>>>
Read 48 tweets
Mar 30
1/?
.
🚨👶:: Sorry, but, your baby's UGLY! ::👶🚨

I know.
It's not nice to hear.
But ... it's the truth.

That site (or little collection of) ...
... not as pretty (good) as you thought!

No - not all of you.
But many.

>>>

#SEO #HCU #Niche Image : Product stock photo of a "cabbage patch" baby doll. Iconic/stylised large, round face (wider than tall), with large round eyes, little snub nose, chunk rose coloured cheeks etc. Dressed in blue Babygro/onesie, laid atop a soft/material "cabbage".
2/?

Okay - attention grab is over,
I'm not intending to insult you ... but it's a phrase that has the right meaning,
and applies to sooooo many right now.

You were ranking.
You were not ranking because you were the best.
You were not ranking because you were original.

>>>
3/?

You were ranking because G had a flaw (or several),
and in some cases,
some of you darn well knew you were using exploits!

Did you deserve to get tanked,
this hard?

NO!

But ... other side of the coin...
did some of the lower ranking sites deserve to be below you?

>>>
Read 37 tweets
Feb 10
1/?
🚨:: >90% of pages get 0 SE Traffic? ::🚨

@nathangotch gives 3 reasons why this may happen,
(figure based on an @Ahrefs study (LINT))

1) Repeat tactic fails them
2) Wrong tactic
3) Inexperience

But, I've got a Very different perspective!

>>>

#SEO #Traffic #Content
2/?

:: 1- Logic ::
There may be tons of pages out there,
but simple logic says that they can't all be ranked top and get the clicks.

Typical CTR Distribution pushes most traffic to the top N pages.

>>>

<Link to the study should be below :D>
ahrefs.com/blog/search-tr…
3/?

:: 2- Dupes ::
G have stated that a significant part of the web (they've crawled) is duplicated!
And G tend to filter dupes - so a % of pages are unlikely to show, and thus generate no traffic.

:: 3- Bias ::
People go for Brands, Names etc.
They will get a % of clicks

>>>
Read 16 tweets
Jan 22
1/?
:: Is Guest Posting Dead? ::

There's 2 parts to @mattdiggityseo's tweet I want to cover.

1) The Guest Posting part
2) The Link Assessment part

>>>

#SEO #GuestPosts #LinkBuilding
2/?

:: Guest Posting ::

I've said it before, and I'll say it again;
if you're primary motivator for GPing is "SEO Links",
you're doing it for the wrong reasons,
and likely to get it wrong.

Here's a whole bunch of reasons to do Guest Posts.

>>>
3/?

Guest Posting is part of Promotion (Marketing).
It's to show you know your stuff, to earn trust, reach new audiences etc.

You don't go on day time TV or talk shows to earn links!
You don't do Press interviews to earn links.

Why write for 3rd parties for links?

>>>
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(