The quiet, unspoken, pressure to embody gender norms, to try to fit in and seem like a typical, "normal" guy/man/bro/dude, even when, who knows, maybe all the other guys are also pretending or self-policing in the same way, to fit in with you.
Even when you know the guys and they'd probably be totally cool with you being a diff sort of guy to them, I'm always sort of curious, how many of them aren't actually that sort of guy either? We all just sort of play along to try to fit in, but maybe *all* of us are pretending?
If only we could all drop the act all at once. I'm sure there's a movie/TV reference I could reference here, but I'm blanking. But surely, there's one where everyone is standing around, brewskis in hand, talking about football, and then everyone sort of eyes one another and then
finally, somehow, it drops, and everyone realizes they were all pretending, bc they thought that's what everyone else was all about. So, none of us were actually here for the BBQ & football? You guys want to pop over to the wine & cheese at the art opening instead?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My thanks to @softsoundingsea for bringing this article to my attention I don't know the author, and have nothing against them personally, but this seems a fine example of the kinds of things we see far too often in discussions of Okinawa & politics,
And an indication, perhaps, of the kinds of things that Tokyo Review publishes, i.e. the kinds of submissions they approve, or invite. I have been aware of the existence of Tokyo Review for a while, but only recently have started to get a sense of the character of the site.
As is very often the case with a certain brand of commentary on these issues, the article overall prioritizes the importance of the US-Japan alliance and security concerns over the well-being or democratic rights of the Okinawan people.
"Having settled where Loochoo was, he went on to enquire about the people ... On telling him that they had no arms, he said 'no arms - you mean no cannon, but they have muskets.' I said not only have they no cannon, they have no swords nor spears ... No, I replied, we never saw
any kind of warlike weapon. ... I stated to him they they had no wars, upon which he shook his head, as if the supposition were monstrous and unnatural."
Basil Hall was a British Royal Navy captain who visited Okinawa in 1816. He met with Napoleon the following year.
Thank you to everyone at @ucsc_omi for an incredible program today on the Koza Uprising which took place on Dec 20, 1970. Deeply moving, thought-provoking, and educational. I learned a lot, and gave me a lot to think about.
In the early morning hours of Dec 20, 1970, an American GI in Koza (now Okinawa City) accidentally hit an Okinawan man in the street with his car. Okinawa had been under US military occupation at this point for 25 years, 18 years longer than mainland Japan.
In that time, Okinawa had seen countless such traffic incidents, not to mention instances of physical and sexual violence which in most cases ended with the Americans involved facing no legal repercussions. Extraterritoriality, or unequal treatment under the law, was standard.
Those who have been following me know I'm working on a translation of a chronology of events of the Bakumatsu period - the years leading up to the fall of the Tokugawa shogunate + the Meiji Restoration.
Today, I came across an exciting line:
Kagoshima domain retainers Arima Shinshichi and Tanaka Kensuke; Ronin Tanaka Kawachinosuke, Maki Izumi, Yoshimura Torataro; and others gather around dawn and depart Osaka for Kyoto. They go up the Yodo River, arrive at Fushimi around dusk, and rest at the Teradaya inn.
The Teradaya Incident which resulted on 1862/4/23 is easily one of the favorite, romanticized, bad-ass fights for samurai weeaboos.
I'll give the text I'm translating, my rough translation, and then just a little extra comments :)
“... when envoys went up to Edo, everything was done with great care, and we hear that it received praise in the Yamato court; this is the pinnacle of things coming together (happiness).”
I can't say that I actually addressed this all that well in the diss, but the question being: what was the role of tradition, precedent, protocol, in shaping diplomatic ritual interactions in early modern East Asia?
In diplomatic history, most work focuses on the politics of the situation. But, when politics wasn't discussed and the relationship was barely changing but instead only ritually reaffirmed time and again, what about the importance of performing ritual properly?
A short thread on the importance of basic general details in your history research & writing. Reading 「徳川将軍家の演出力」by Andô Yûichirô 安藤優一郎 right now, and I'm loving it. Only on Chap 2, but so far lots of good basic details that I just hadn't ever come across before.
The title is kind of a pain to translate, but I guess literally it's something like "The Performance Ability of the Tokugawa Shogunal House." Talking about how processions, audience ceremonies, etc were used to construct and convey notions of the shogun's power. 2/x
I suppose it may sound super niche and too-fine-detailed to spell it out this way, but, in all the years of my diss research, there were so many basic questions I just never happened upon the answers for. 3/x