1/ A couple days ago Pfizer made this fail meme.
Why did their marketoids make such a grave mis-understanding?
Two theories. Let's investigate.
2/ The template: "Running Away Balloon".
Note the emotions are fairly unambiguous: a man tries joyously to get ahold of a nice ball; a pink monster forcibly stops him causing stress to the man.
3/ The first panel clearly shows the emotions: desirable ball, joyous & hopeful man moving forward.
The second panel happens rapidly & unexpectedly - shows the moment the emotions *turn* to worry. The pink monster was *an internal monster*, stopping the man's improvement.
4/ Note the monster is by no means benevolent nor even humane. It's just a monster, only vaguely connected to humanity.
5/ Back to Pfizer.
They completely ignored the emotions *expressed* in the comic and instead project their own ones:
running bad, ball with bad label bad, pink good, large vaguely humane shape good, stopping somebody forcibly good, man's desire & worry is irrelevant.
6/ Perhaps Pfizer's marketoids went with low-T thinking:
"Pink character as a loving mother, protecting a wayward child from harm. She gives the kid a tender embrace, that's simply lovely! The kid was toying with danger, now feeling bad is a valuable lesson!"
7/ Or perhaps Pfizer marketoids went with authoritarian thinking:
"Trust official science, it will protect you from harm. It can give your brain strong support through whole life, very modern! The man was endangering everybody with wild theories, should show remorse and regret!"
8/ So, dear reader - Pfizer, low-T viewpoint? or Authoritarian viewpoint?
You decide.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ rise of experts as symptom of breakdown of societal structures.
for subjects too large, or too long running for one person to reasonably observe, we used to have societal structures to hold memory and form opinions.
now that's offloaded onto experts for hire.
2/ we end up nonsense such as certain draconian measures in the pandemic, varying climate change predictions that always point to one and same solution, and topsy-turvy energy sector policy.
and we are told "only experts can form opinions on those".
3/ note that forcing whole society to act, expeditiously and laboriously, on plans that the society is not convinced to, is immoral and evil.
both directly, and also as creating structures & cultural norms for further such evils.
1/ in XVII century then-modern medicine made childbirth a medical procedure, performed at hospital in standardized manner.
this made systematic one of the risks to the mother - death from "puerperal fever", a bacterial infection that thrived in the serially performed procedure.
2/ the form of the procedure & other hospital work, and the risks to the mother were back then broadly accepted by the medical community.
the risk to the mother was very high by today's standards:
3/ a hungarian doctor proposed in 1847 *washing hands* of the practitioners with an early form of antiseptic as practical way of reducing the risks of mortality to below 1%.
this was supported by his subsequent scientific work, and by observation of the results in the hospital.