Clint Ballinger Profile picture
Nov 15, 2021 24 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Economic Schools as paintings:
Classical Image
Mercantilism Image
Marxism Image
Institutional Image
Neoclassical Image
Chicago School Image
New Keynesian Image
"New Consensus" Macro/Monetary Policy (just missing a pin) Image
Post Keynesian Image
MMT Image
Austrian (I don't know why...just feels right) Image
Sociology (and real business/sectoral research) Image
Microeconomics (as often defined) Image
Economic History Image
Environmental Economics Image
Austrian Economics #mises Image
Modern Monetary Theory #mmt Image
Modern Monetary Theory #mmt Image
Internet version of MMT Image
Mainstream & Marxist critiques of MMT Image
Chicago School Image
Econometrics #econometrics Image
Bullionism (chrysohedonism) Image
Note mercantilism ≠ bullionism. See, e.g., "Mercantilism & Economic Development: Schumpeterian
Dynamics, Institution Building,
& International Benchmarking." #econtwitter
andreasaltelli.eu/file/repositor…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Clint Ballinger

Clint Ballinger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @clintballinger

Oct 26, 2023
1970s and Monetary Policy Today

A 🧵…

In a recent twitter thread I outlined why I believe the new Reg Q inflation theory can be seen as supporting post-keynesian views. However, there is a meta issue I was not able to address in such a short format.
The DSS paper argues that by putting a ceiling on bank-deposit interest rates, Regulation Q stopped the transmission of interest rate hikes (Fed funds rate), thereby breaking the primary tool of the Fed from 1965~1980 when Q became binding on bank deposit rates.
Besides the importance for understanding 1970s inflation, the meta point their paper makes can be interpreted as supporting mainstream monetary beliefs. Chiefly, that *but for* Reg Q stopping proper transmission, monetary policy was (before 1965) and later (post ~1980) working..
Read 12 tweets
Oct 23, 2023
1970s Inflation Revisited: New Reg Q Theory Supports *Heterodox* Economic Policy

A🧵1/X

“we offer a different explanation for the Great Inflation..The explanation is simple, yet so far completely overlooked”

Drechsler, Savov, Schnabl (DSS) #econtwitter cepr.org/voxeu/columns/…
Image
Myths on 1970s inflation sadly still shape the beliefs of the economists who have the ears of policymakers.
The belief interest rates “fixed” the problem rather than worsening it,
combines w an only weak acceptance of the Vietnam War/73/79 Oil shocks as prime causes, has led to decades of wasted time on “monetary policy” (read: fiddling w a single knob, interest rates) at the expense of the real economy and investment in fiscal expertise and policy
Read 22 tweets
May 10, 2023
🧵
SUPPLY, DEMAND, INVESTMENT & INFLATION

If you lack something you truly need, you are better off figuring out how to get it rather than just deciding to give up and go without. You increase supply rather than reduce your wellbeing by giving up on your demand 1/x
When it comes to inflation, oddly, popular opinion is to do the opposite. The primary policy against inflation governments turn to is to raise interest rates with the end goal of reducing the public's consumption of goods and services rather than increase production & capacity 2/
Worse still, that goal is attempted through using rate hikes to *reduce* investment, *reduce* employment, and *stifle* wages; the latter makes life less, not more, affordable for workers 3/
Read 19 tweets
Apr 22, 2023
"We use several formal representations of the consumption–investment trade-off in growth theory, found in the Harrod–Domar growth model, the Feldman–Mahalanobis model and Kalecki’s 1963 growth model" #econtwitter @paulkrugman @Noahpinion academic.oup.com/cje/advance-ar…
(2018) I would change some things now or say differently, but some basic ideas hold that are relevant to the OP. clintballinger.com/2018/11/08/the…
Also, this superbly details how development policy faces profound issues that transcend the framework in the "Weaknesses" article:
"The Long, Slow Death of Global Development"
americanaffairsjournal.org/2022/11/the-lo…
@davideoks @humford
Read 6 tweets
Oct 14, 2022
Imagine this is the world. There are no countries (& no world government). It is full of people making & doing things.
How do people exchange/trade?
Now imagine the people in A have carved out a country.
They create a fully chartal system (tax/tax-credits).
The "A" tax-credit unit is used to organize public goods (infrastructure, healthcare, education etc.) as well as for general use
Now imagine there are two countries, each with its own tax-credit currency.
Why would one want the other's tax credits? Presumably to buy something from the other country.
What would the accounting look like?
Read 7 tweets
Dec 27, 2021
There is a pervasive, annoyingly simplistic, & neverending online debate: Libertarian/free market vs socialism/communism, as if these are stark choices 1/
This scene looks like it works pretty well as a "free" market. Probably don't want the gov running our restaurants. (I used to work in the restaurant scene in this alley in the financial district, San Francisco) 2/ Image
I think most of us don't want corporations or "free market" controlling these folks tho. In other words, a military, & restaurants/ entertainment/retail, are two easy to agree on areas for most regarding gov 3/ Image
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(