3/ So, instead of evaluating rationally, people resort to their gut feeling, which is informed by the perceived alternatives for the offering.
Hence, the positioning of a product becomes the main criteria by much price is judged by people.
4/ But it’s also the other way around.
Especially for new brands, price serves as an anchor to the customer for deciding which category to slot the product in.
For example, the price of a newly launched car slots it either in the luxury or the mid-range or the budget market.
5/ It matters less if the car is actually luxury or not, but if the price of the car is similar to Mercedes or BMW, the expectations of the consumer and their willingness to pay will be similar to Mercedes or BMW.
6/ This suggests that no one company has the leverage to charge whatever it wants to.
Customer expectations for the right price for a product are guided by what alternatives are available in the market and how much do those things cost.
7/ Startups have no option but to play within the market of perceived alternatives and charge similar to what those alternatives are charging.
8/ e.g. Internet has made consumers habituated to free news, information, and videos. A startup that wants to charge for information has an uphill battle because, in the minds of consumers, the price of info is close to nil (even though the value they get from such info is high)
9/ So, value pricing doesn’t work out – water is valuable but people don’t pay a lot for it (because a lot of it is available)
10/ This is also why a lower price is not always better.
When products offered are too cheap, they send a signal about quality.
11/ Especially in enterprises where they’re used to purchasing software and services worth many thousands of dollars, a product that’s only priced a few dollars is perceived to be meant for small businesses and not enterprises.
12/ So, price your products not based on the value you’re providing but what your target customers are used to paying for offerings closest in their minds to your offering.
13/ This also means that through right messaging and positioning an entrepreneur has an opportunity to influence what customers compare the offering to and hence what he is able to charge.
14/ For example, if you’re launching an information product, don’t call it a report and have customers compare it to freely available info on the internet.
Position it as consulting and customers will be able to pay dearly for it.
15/ Remember 🧠
don’t price your product based on the value it creates, price it based on products you want it to be compared with
16/ That's it!
I'm posting ~1 new mental model for entrepreneurs every week.
1/ Businesses don’t exist to make revenue, they exist to make profits.
But the lure of revenue is hard to resist.
2/ It’s natural to admire the billions of dollars that big US retailers such as Guess, Macy’s, Radioshack and Toys R Us generate every year but it’s difficult to digest that they are in terrible shape because they’re not making any profit.
We have 26 constants of nature whose value we need to feed into our scientific theories to get predictions about everything else.
The key question is: will their values emerge from a deeper theory or if they’re simply randomly initialised in our universe?
The fact we exist depends a lot on what value these constants take (e.g. mass of electron), so it’s hard to digest that they’re randomly initialised to lucky values.
Our universe can’t be fine tuned.
But they could very well take on random values across a much bigger multiverse and hence we’ll always find them to be lucky in a universe we live in.
This possibility of multiverse is unnerving.
If all values and laws exist, physics becomes geography - the study of our region.
Thanks to new sponsors, we're awarding grants to three more winners who want to:
- Train underprivileged kids in 🏉 Rugby
- Starting a school for kids suffering from ⚧️ gender dysphoria (first-of-its-kind in India)
- Supporting 🥻handloom artists from Odhisa