#PlantScienceClassics #10: AuxREs, ARFs & Aux/IAAs. In 1997 the trifecta of Tim Ulmasov (TU), Gretchen Hagen (GH) & Tom Guilfoyle (TG) unleashed their @ScienceMagazine/@ThePlantCell double strike on the plant sciences, making auxin the hot topic of the field for the next decade.
Starting with Charles Darwin & son Francis in 1880, several scientists (J. Sachs, F. Went, N. Cholodny...) had speculated that there must be a mobile substance in plants, acting as messenger to direct growth in response to stimuli such as light or gravity (a ‘growth substance’).
In 1931 Fritz Kögl managed to isolate & describe this substance which he named 'auxin' (greek,‘to grow’). As it resembled animal hormones, he also proposed the name ‘phytohormones’ for this new group of plant substances. How this #Auxin promoted growth was not known yet, however.
In the 1950s Folke Skoog (you know him from his MurashigeSkoog-medium) showed that auxin-treatment increases RNA/DNA content in cells, though at the time this was regarded as nucleic acid metabolism, rather than gene expression, as the latter concept had not yet been established.
Only in the 1980s did GH/TG, Athanasios Theologis & others link the growth effects of auxin to gene regulation by demonstrating that specific mRNAs were upregulated following auxin-treatment. Some of the first auxin-induced genes hence carry the name GH1-3 (GRETCHEN HAGEN1-3).
In the following decade, GH/TG & others tried to identify the Auxin Responsive Elements (AuxREs) in the promoters, using sequencing & alignment of short DNA stretches (no genome data available!) followed by deletions of conserved regions to check for a loss of auxin-induction.
This resulted in the first strike of TU/GH/TG with a 1995 @ThePlantCell paper showing that AuxREs are composite modules with an auxin activated TGTCTC motif, that controls the activity of an overlapping, otherwise constitutively active transcriptional activator site CCTCGTG.
For their 1997 @ScienceMagazine paper TU/GH/TG then use an AuxRE palindrome DNA-stretch in a yeast 1-hybrid screen, pulling out ARF1 as DNA-binding protein. Using DNAse I footprinting & methylation interference, they show that ARF1 indeed binds to the TGTCTC motif (* in fig).
They also find a protein-interaction domain in ARF1, so for their 1997 @ThePlantCell paper they perform a yeast 2-hybrid screen, identifying Aux/IAA proteins as ARF-interactors, and demonstrate that these Aux/IAA proteins appear to be repressors of ARF1-mediated auxin-induction.
However, they also use the palindromic AuxREs they identified to build a synthetic auxin-reporter, the now legendary DR5::GUS line, to visualize auxin-concentrations in planta. Based on their results, TU/GH/TG conclude that binding of Aux/IAAs to ARFs suppresses AuxRE-activity.
In another follow-up in 1999 in @ThePlantJournal, the authors add that it is indeed ARF dimers that occupy the two AuxREs in a palindrome. However, the final piece to obtain a full model of how auxin activates gene expression was added by the @OttolineLeyser & Mark Estelle labs:
In 2001 @Nature William Gray & @StefanKepinski provide evidence that Auxin induces the interaction of the SCF/TIR1 complex with Aux/IAAs, leading to Aux/IAA degradation. This releases ARFs from Aux/IAA-binding/inhibition, enabling them to activate gene expression via AuxREs.
These breakthroughs, together with the concurrent advances in the understanding of polar auxin transport and its involvement in plant morphogenesis (2 key papers in figure), made auxin and phytohormones the hot topic of the plant science field around the turn of the century.
Ethylene is a gaseous #phytohormone with a wide range of roles from plant development to immunity. Ernest Starling in 1905 defined a hormone as mobile chemical messenger synthesized by a multicellular organism, that has physiological activity distant from the site of synthesis.
The effect of ethylene on plants was first noted in the 1900s, when it leaked from illumination gas used in lamps and affected plants nearby. But it was Dimitry Neljubow, who in a series of experiments identified ethlyene as the active substance in the illumination gas in 1905.
#PlantScienceClassics #17: The Mildew Resistance Locus O (MLO). 80 years ago Rudolf Freisleben & Alfred Lein created the first powdery mildew resistant barley plant. 30yrs ago the gene was mapped, 25yrs ago cloned-yet it's mode of action remains a mystery. doi.org/10.1007/BF0148…
Powdery mildew is a fungal disease of many crop plants, most prominently maybe barley and wheat, where outbreaks can reduce grain quality & yield, and ruin complete harvests. Visible are the fluffy patches formed by the fungus (Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei).
Freisleben used radiation-induced mutagenesis to create the barley 𝘮𝘭𝘰 mutant, which showed full resistant to this pathogen. A massive agricultural breakthrough!
See also Classic #2, to read about how Emmy Stein has developed this technique in 1921:
#PlantScienceClassics #16: A linkage map of Arabidopsis thaliana. In 1983 the legendary Maarten Koornneef published a genetic map of A. thaliana, the basis for genetic work & an important contribution towards the acceptance of Arabidopsis as plant model. doi.org/10.1093/oxford…
In the early 1980s scientists finally adopted A. thaliana as model plant. At this point, several mutants were available, but their positions in the genome were mostly unknown. This was years before genome sequences became available,&genetic maps were still based on recombination.
Arabidopsis pioneer György Rédei did linkage analyses with 14 loci in the 1960s, but his genetic map from 1965 suggested 6 linkage groups – 1 more than chromosomes. Curiously, A. D. McKelvie created another map in parallel - & found 4 groups, 1 less than chromosomes.
#PlantScienceClassics #15 #PlantScienceFails #1: The auxin-independent (axi) Nicotiana tabacum lines. In 1992 Richard Walden et al. (specifically co-worker Inge Czaja) published activation-tagged axi protoplasts @ScienceMagazine that could divide&grow in the absence of any auxin!
The development of plant transformation in the early 1980s (classics #6&13) was inspirational for many scientists. Among them was Richard Walden, who teamed up with plant transformation pioneers Barbara & Thomas Hohn to leverage this advance to develop the “Agroinfection" method.
He then joined the next transformation pioneer, Jeff Schell, to develop more such tools. Their first was Activation-Tagging: 4 CaMV 35S enhancers (classic#9) were placed at the RB of the T-DNA. That way, they would overexpress the plant gene next to which the T-DNA was inserted.
#PlantScienceClassics #14: Mendelian inheritance. In 1866 Gregor Mendel published his work on dominant/recessive trait inheritance in peas, establishing the hereditary rules on which modern genetics is based. But nobody cared,& his scientific career ended. biodiversitylibrary.org/page/48299076
Mendel had always been interested in nature, and grew/kept and observed plants and bees in his parent’s garden. He later decided to become a monk and teacher. However, he failed teacher’s exam in 1850 & 1856, & eventually settled on being a monk and substitute teacher.
He satisfied his curiosity as a naturalist by keeping and observing plants and bees in the monastery garden, and eventually became interested in how traits are determined through generations. So he started to conduct crossing experiments with mice with grey or white fur.
Do you know Daisy Roulland-Dussoix? She is one of the discoverers of restriction enzymes, who’s findings paved the way for the development of recombinant DNA and cloning technologies. Accordingly, the finding was rewarded with a #NobelPrize. But the prize didn’t go to her... 🧵👇
Daisy Roulland-Dussoix worked with Werner Arber to study the mechanism for the observed host-specificity of λ Phages. It was known from an important 1953 paper (Bertani & Weigle) that phages, that had replicated in a certain E. coli strain, could only re-infect the same strain.
Roulland-Dussoix & Arber showed that host-specificity is linked with the phage’s DNA. Using phages carrying radiolabeled DNA, they showed that progeny with 2 parental DNA strands retained specificity, while progeny with newly synthesized daughter strands could adapt to new hosts.