"We need the office because we solve all our problems at the water cooler"
People think this is a good thing?
Breaking down this office myth 🧵
Companies the leave innovation, communication, and problem-solving to chance are broken
Allowing this to happen by accident is akin to buying a lottery ticket and crossing your fingers
Trusting your organization success to this is suicidee
Ask anyone who says this:
"what the biggest problem they've ever seen solved 'at the water cooler'?"
They'll likely tell you that they've never seen it happen personally, but to trust them, people tell them it happens all the time
This means it rarely happens
The reality: trusting one of the most important processes to luck means it's broken
Solving your biggest problems by the chance of who is standing at the other side of the watercooler isn't a reason to return to an office full-time
It is a reason to build new processes
What people really mean when they say the "water cooler" are moments that happen spontaneously
Lessons that people learn from a knowledgable senior colleague or the osmosis that happens from being around great professionals, for example
But this is even more of an issue
How many of your companies most important lessons aren't being passed on to your people?
What organizational knowledge is being lost on a yearly basis as the best teacher of those lessons depart
Instead, imagine these lessons had been collected in documents
Rather than being shared with one person, it is codified in a document anyone in the organization can consume
Now it can be improved over time by anyone
That key piece of organizational knowledge exists forever in the companies repository of knowledge.
This muscle grows over it and it can never be lost
Repeat this for everything
Equally, the same applies to problems people are facing, ideas they have, or opportunities they see
Instead of one person who happens to be on the other side of the conversations having the opportunity to contribute, the whole organization does
Instead of thinking it's a good thing that one person solved an issue by luck, companies should ask themselves:
"How often does this happen, and how many times in the past has the wrong person been on the other side of the conversation"
How much have they lost as a result?
Similarly, what about people who are less able or willing to verbalize their thoughts and ideas?
How many people in your organization are participating in the conversations you've deemed so important to your companies success
Ask your team if working remotely & being able to share ideas, feedback, + thoughts in writing rather than verbally has helped them participate more equally
If the answer is yes, it stands to reason more "watercooler" moments are happening virtually than they were in person
The final piece of this is the fear companies have around junior staff
"How will they learn if they're not around other people"
You mean a generation of people who have grown up:
- building social relationships virtually
- communicating virtually
- learning virtually
Have they asked these young people how they feel about it? What couldn't they learn if every piece of organizational knowledge was documented?
"Well it's the soft skills we are worried about"
Which ones? How to run client meetings? How to write emails?
Remote-first does not mean remote only
How many of the skills you're scared about young people not learning need them to be in an office full-time?
How many could be learned by in-person onboarding and occasional visits to a physical location
Evolving away from a model that demands people leave family & friends behind in pursuit of opportunity only big cities afford is a good thing
They can still live in cities if they choose – this is one of the hidden positives of remote work: cities become better places to live
It sounds like some companies are scared of people not learning how to play office politics
This is less of a problem working remotely anyway and can be ignored
Moving to a world that focuses on performance over who you drink with after work is a very good thing
In a knowledge economy, the most successful companies are those that employ the most talented people
Office-only companies will find it impossible to compete
Fear is a blindfold
Companies refusing to learn the lessons the last 2 years have taught them won't make it through this decade
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“People need to go back to the office for the human contact and connection”
But I get way more “human contact” with my kids, family, friends, & doing the things I love most – while doing the best work of my life —being a remote worker?
Breaking down this office myth 🧵
There next line is always “humans are social animals” as if we had offices thousands of years ago
We have never spent so little time with our kids, families, and friends
We need deep relationships with to have meaningful interactions
At an office? Not so much
*Not saying people don’t make friends at work
But think about it: how many people are you still in weekly contact with from your last employer?
🧠 Knowledge work: When knowledge work became a major economic sector in the twentieth century, the necessity to have employees work together around stationary machinery, as in the classic factory model, was curtailed
📍Why Co-location Happened: Knowledge work requires collaboration and access to information, both of which are conveniently served when individuals are physically near each other
Companies adapted the standardized nine-to-five work shift into the white-collar world