Share this page!

Josh Barro Profile picture
Twitter logo
15 Nov, 4 tweets, 1 min read
San Francisco clearly has some problems with public disorder that it should address, but if you're going to claim anyone has "ruined" the city, you need to explain why people remain willing to pay so much to live and do business there.
On another note, I find that a lot of people in San Francisco are very annoying, but that longstanding fact doesn't seem to have depressed rents, either.
No two groups of people in the history of the world have deserved each other as much as SF's tech bros and its hippies.
Is everyone in SF still on Keto?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Josh Barro

Josh Barro Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jbarro

Josh Barro Profile picture
16 Nov
Yes. And it's true!
Telling parents to mind their own business at a time when schools were not delivering what they are ordinarily expected to was a mistake, and broadly casting the people who are objecting to K-12 practices as "white supremacists" is definitely going to be a mistake.
It is just the opposite of showing to voters that you take their concerns in good faith.
Read 8 tweets
Josh Barro Profile picture
4 Nov
Comms at Microsoft now apparently involve a lengthy land acknowledgement followed by speakers announcing not just their race but also their height and what color their clothes are.
Land acknowledgements are such nonsense... if you're that concerned, why aren't you giving the land back?
Anyway, talking like a total weirdo is bad in contexts where you're going to have to relate to normal people, such as customers
Read 5 tweets
Josh Barro Profile picture
3 Nov
I think the lesson for Democrats is actually worse than this. McAuliffe isn't stupid. He ran this campaign because he thought it was his best hand to play. Voters are dissatisfied with the country's direction, the economy, and not inclined to reward Dems talking up their records.
To do better next year, Dems need better fundamentals on COVID and the economy, and they need to appear more engaged on fixing those fundamentals. Right now, the Biden Admin's emphasis is everywhere else -- climate, Dem wish-list items in the two big spending bills.
The good news for Democrats is there are reasons to think those fundamentals will probably be better next year even if they don't change what they're doing at all. But looking more engaged would still help.
Read 4 tweets
Josh Barro Profile picture
27 Oct
I don’t think this is right. While a wealth tax would be very likely to go down at this court, this is not quite a wealth tax, and real estate (the constitutionally diciest thing to mark to market) is taxed only on realization. This tax is in an area of real uncertainty.
That said, I would be fascinated to read a Gorsuch opinion on what exactly “direct tax” means
There are two ways the tax can survive: Either mark to market taxation is income tax, authorized by the sixteenth amendment; or, it’s a property tax, but taxes on securities are not direct taxes (remember, real estate is not marked to market in the Wyden plan)
Read 5 tweets
Josh Barro Profile picture
20 Oct
A policy that induces a significant number of police and firefighters to resign before their pensions fully vest is likely to provide a significant fiscal savings. Pension earnings are very uneven, they are stupidly backloaded, and implied total comp is HUGE in late career years.
(This is also a reason I am skeptical that many will make good on the threat...)
This is a problem with how we compensate police AND teachers -- the pension structures that reward specific career lengths (often 20 years for police, 30 for teachers) lock people into jobs they don't like, aren't suitable for, and might otherwise leave...
Read 4 tweets
Josh Barro Profile picture
17 Oct
If it doesn’t cost anything, why would it need to be paid for? This is such a bizarre talking point.
“cost” is not a synonym for “deficit impact.” Also, I’ll be very surprised if the real deficit impact is $0, but we won’t have clarity on that until there’s a deal.
Try asking yourself, “am I talking like a normal person?”
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @jbarro has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @jbarro!

Read all threads by @jbarro

:(