1/ Polling shows 53% support rejoining the EU against 47% who oppose it. 48% think Brexit was wrong vs 39% who think it was right.
Labour wants to stay quiet on Brexit to recapture the red wall. But should non-Labour folk follow Labour and do the same? I say no.
2/ Democracy requires that the views of the anti-Brexit majority are represented. If Labour fails to provide that, then other parties, and political activists have to do that job. It is a travesty of democracy to have over half the population silenced on this issue.
3/ Brexit leaders and many in Labour want to present Brexit as an irresistible political force. That is a lie. In spite of the hostility of most of the political and media establishment Remain gained a majority in the polls in 2017 and has retained it ever since.
4/ The Brexiters were desperate to block a 2nd referendum which they knew they would lose. The 2019 election produced a majority of votes for 2nd referendum parties despite Corbyn's unpopularity, a poor Labour campaign and a wretched LibDem national campaign.
5/ From 2017 onwards Remain has won the battle of public opinion against the headwind of establishment hostility. We have been let down by the undemocratic FPTP system and by wretchedly bad opposition leadership.
6/ Labour may feel that it needs to play down Brexit to regain the red wall. That might work, for Labour. But it might also reinforce the image of Labour as an insincere and patronising party controlled by a manipulative metropolitan elite.
7/ But should Remainers in general follow Labour's strategy? I would say no. We should represent the majority, and the LibDems and Greens have many target seats in pro-EU majority areas, the number of which has surely grown since 2016.
8/ I believe a Progressive Alliance to be vital for the defence and strengthening of our democracy. But within such an Alliance I think it would be better if there were a significant shift of support from Labour to the LibDems and Greens.
9/ The stronger the LibDems and Greens are relative to Labour the more likely we are to get a Progressive Alliance, PR and the fundamental political reform which the UK urgently needs. We do not need another solo Labour government deciding that FPTP is actually not that bad.
10/ I do not believe rejoining the EU is the task for the next Parliament. We first need a fundamental strengthening of our democracy, the expulsion of big money from our politics, media reform and the pushing of Brexit nationalism onto the political margins - all big tasks.
11/ We don't need opposition parties screaming 'rejoin now', but we do need at least some of them to speak loudly clearly and honestly about the fundamental problems inherent in a hard Brexit. And none must rule out rejoining.
12/ The formula for someone like Starmer should be "For the moment we'll make the best out of Brexit, even though it has fundamental weaknesses. If one day a large majority of the public make clear that they want to rejoin, then democracy requires that we would listen to them."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Tories are dumping the eastern arm of HS2 and HS3. So much for levelling up. A once in a lifetime opportunity to provide proper rail links between our great Northern cities and between the Midlands and Yorkshire and the NE has been thrown away.
HS3 wouldn't just reduce Leeds to Liverpool journey times to around 50 minutes and Liverpool-Manchester and Manchester-Leeds times to around 25 minutes. It would carry trains to Hull, Teesside and Newcastle, and finally give Bradford the rail service it deserves.
If routed through an underground station in Manchester also serving other cross-Manchester services, HS3 could transform Manchester from a rail bottleneck into an integrated regional rail hub. Rejecting HS3 is classic short-termist idiocy.
1/ Simon Jenkins thinks that the Manchester-Leeds HS3 is wasteful. How short-sighted can you get? Rail services between Liverpool and Leeds are appallingly slow. HS3 would finally provide proper transport links between three of the UK's greatest cities. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
2/ If the UK were a normal European country HS2 would have been completed a decade or more ago and HS3 would be complete or under construction. Short-termism on all sides of the political spectrum has crippled the development of a proper rail network in the UK.
3/ HS3 wouldn't just reduce Leeds to Liverpool journey times to around 50 minutes. It would link to Hull, Teesside and Newcastle, and finally give Bradford the rail service it deserves.
What is kleptofascism? Kleptofascism is the harnessing of fascist propaganda themes and techniques by the sociopathic super-rich and their political and media minions. For example, Brexit "Will of the People" rhetoric echoed Goebbels' response to a Nazi referendum victory.
Here is Professor Timothy Snyder explaining how the political right on both sides of the Atlantic are helping themselves to the Nazi propaganda manual, using simple emotive slogans to divide the population into friends and enemies.
What is the goal of kleptofascism? The goal is to install the rule of the libertarian oligarchs and their political hirelings as outlined in the "Sovereign Individual" co-authored by William Rees-Mogg. It's a system very akin to that in Russia - oligarchy posing as democracy.
In 2003 Sajid Javid took his Deutsche Bank bonus via a Cayman Isles scheme, which he volunteered for, that was ruled by the Supreme Court to constitute tax evasion. He took part in a scheme designed to defraud the HMRC of tax revenue and enrich himself. nicholaswilson.com/sajid-javid-ho…
Sajid Javid could have declined to join a scheme which very obviously aimed to deprive HMRC of tax revenues, whether legally through a loophole, or illegally. He was already wealthy, so it was greed and disloyalty to the nation that guided his decision.
It's not surprising that Sajid Javid engaged in this tax haven tax-dodging scam. He's a devotee of Ayn Rand the promoter of a cult of amoral selfishness and ruthlessness – in short, the worship of sociopathy. spectator.co.uk/article/why-do…
A move to rejoin is a long way off. But if Starmer rules it out then he can fuck off. We are the majority and we've had five years of patronising insults from the Labour leadership.
A Progressive Alliance is necessary, but we can and should back pro-EU parties within an alliance
There is no evidence that Labour would suffer from being critical of Brexit, because it never has been critical of Brexit as such.
And Labour's Brexit stance makes it look patronising, insincere, weak and manipulative - hardly a recommendation to the electorate.
What I suspect many people want of government is not merely policies, but a sense of clear and definite leadership, clear principles and the courage to stand up to difficult challenges. A party leadership that looks driven by focus groups and private polling is hardly that.