Looking at the two new Sunway papers up for the Gordon Bell. None of them are Exaflop on FP64, for clarification.
The Quantum paper showcases 1.2EF using FP32, 4.4EF using mixed, on 41.9M cores. No FP64.
The nuclear paper showcases 298PF using FP64 on 40.4M cores.
It's worth noting that the definition of 'core' is being stretched here. Each chip is listed as having 390 cores - that's 6 groups of (8x8 compute elements + 1 management element). The management element has 512-bit SIMD, unclear what the compute elements can do with vectors
I suspect the management element also acts as the front-end for the compute elements in compute element-only mode.
So what we're really counting here is just execution ports that aren't AGUs or L/S
Each 390-core chip thus has 6 groups of 65 'cores', but also each group has a 128-bit DDR4-3200 controller, good for 51.2 GB/s, or dual channel DDR4. In total, that's 12 64-bit channels of DDR4 for 307.2 GB/s. Paper says 96 GB per chip, so 8 GB of DRAM per channel.
But it means each chip has 12 memory slots, and there are 107520 of these chips in the Sunway system. Would be interesting if they're able to get 2 chips or 4 chips per 1U with that many memory channels. It is only 1 DPC though.
Will cite this tweet, which suggests the Sunway system can do FP64 Exaflop.
Sounds like the CPU isn't final?
But 35 MW across 107520 chips means provisioning 326 W per chip. With 70% overhead, each chip is about 190W then? So air cooled is possible.
The Intel Advanced Architecture Development Group (AADG) is responsible for creating the next leap in Microprocessor Design and the future of the x86 environment at Intel by helping to solve the ‘Innovator’s Dilemma’ when it comes to a new core design for Intel.
This dilemma can be simplified into finding the answers to questions like:
Now I've had some time for the @Intel announcements yesterday to sink in, here's my brain dump.
A number of analysts were quite reserved when @PGelsinger joined Intel, stating that no matter what he did, we wouldn't see it for years. I said straight away that Pat can steer the intent of the company as soon as he sat in the seat. Today is a clear message
That being said, Intel last week is still the same as Intel today. Saying stuff doesn't mean much unless Intel does pivot, and it will take a few years to enable that pivot, but there will be a strong undercurrent of things to come throughout, with a continuous focus on 2023
For what it's worth, Intel has been using Arm cores in its products for years. Some we know about, others we do not. Some Intel products contain solely Arm cores.
As for their own custom cores, Intel has had an Arm architecture license for around a decade, if not longer.
How much has Intel used that architecture licence? Golden question. Given that Arm's own cores go from the M0 for microcontrol, up to the X1 for performance, and R-series for real time, and lots in-between, it's hard to say.
A modern CPU has a lot of microcontrollers.
Just don't ask what secret sauce they already add for big customers.
Just found out that the company who installed my new boiler last year, has disappeared. They weren't the best price, but reasonable and 10-year warranty and free inspections. Worksmanship was poor though, and now that 10-year warranty and free inspections are worthless
I emailed them a couple months after installation to come back and fix things (holes in walls). No response. Just went into my loft and they've left old pipes everywhere, didn't clean up after themselves, empty boxes, thrown around the insulation
It seems like almost everything we've got other people to do on this house has been terrible. The stuff we've done ourselves is reasonable. But we only have limited skills and time.
Once again I have another FedEx parcel that was supposed to arrive by noon. 11:58, get an email saying 'delivery exception, customer not available'. Have they been here yet? Nope.
They do this so that they can say they 'attempted' delivery in time. Keeps the success rates high.
This is how they bid for contracts with big companies, on success rates. But they lie.
Last time this happened they still delivered two hours later. But because they said 'attempted, no-one available' by the delivery time, it still counts +ve for the metrics. When it shouldn't.
This is also why some couriers refuse to show you where the delivery driver is on a map, or a # in the chain you are. They claim it's because they do midday pickups for orders made that day. The truth is they want as little evidence as possible that they missed targets.