1. So, one week after being announced on Bari Weiss, the "University of Austin" is turning into an epic clown show. Two prominent members of Board of Advisors (Pinker, comically, below and Robert Zimmer) are out. A third (Gordon Gee) is openly distancing himself from its mission
2. I'm reluctant to call this place "University of Austin" by the way because there already is a University of Texas at Austin (one of the world's great universities, actually!) and this new enterprise, among its other frauds, is clearly intent on brand confusion.
3. So instead of calling this place "University of Austin" it would be better to give it a more accurate name: Potemkin University: it's not so much a real school as a facade of a school designed to fool the credulous and the indoctrinated.
4. There are two broad critiques of Potemkin University: ideologically it's absurd to create school committed to free speech with people who (as some PU advisors have) called for constitution to be changed for anti-Muslim laws & Arthur to be taken off airwaves for being pro-gay.
5. Beyond ideology there's simple fact that all evidence from public documents is that Potemkin University (PU) is run by incompetent cretins -- i.e. they are applying for accreditation at a body that can't give them accreditation (see this great thread)
6. University of Austin -- sorry, I mean Potemkin University -- is both intellectually absurd and also a pretend school. To figure out what's going on I talked to the great @jakebackpack, who lays out clearly the financial farce. jeetheer.substack.com/p/podcast-bari…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. It's a minor problem in grand scheme of things but the one store here in Regina that sells magazines is constantly shrinking its ware. No longer carrying New York Review of New Left Review. But they do carry this gem
2. You would think Hungarian Conservative is a magazine with limited audience outside of Magyar-sphere. But it has a surprisingly robust distribution, popping up all over English speaking world. A handsome journal with clear government & foundation $$ behind it.
3. Hungarian Conservative is a curious bridge journal, bringing together specialized concerns of Obran (lots of anti-EU articles) and USA right (Rod Dreher has a piece accusing Disney corporation of "anti-white racial ideology." Also: "Rommel's Hungarian Soldier"
1. You see people saying "Dune" is a "Star Wars" rip-off and the first impulse is just to laugh b/c of course the novel Dune predates Star Wars & influenced it etc. But there's a larger thing at work, which is the shared universe of the science fiction genre.
2. One of the interesting features of science fiction is the way concepts in it are shared. Not unlike scientific discoveries, once a writer comes up with a great idea, it gets added to common storehouse of the genre & built on: robots, time travel, galactic empires.
3. The idea of the "rip off" is the language of fandom & intellectual property lawyers, within science fiction writing community, it's recognized that writers work by sharing and adding to the storehouse of ideas.
1. In his New Republic review of Dune, @DavidKlion noted film had difficult task of needing to please both "general audiences looking for an epic sci-fi blockbuster, and fans of the classic 1965 Frank Herbert novel"; achievement of movie is it does that.
2. In my experience, Dune does in fact satisfy both those coming in fresh as well as hardcore fans. I saw it with my partner, who (unlike me) hasn't read the books or seen any of the earlier adaptions & she was impressed. It threads a very narrow needle.
3. What the movie does that's smart is take the long bits of exposition (really info-dumps) in the novel & puts them as unexplained background, foregrounding actions of characters. Exposition is turned into visual narrative to an impressive degree.
1. Some in CIA want to go all out to punish Russia for using microwave weapons to harm US spies & diplomats causing Havana Syndrome. My suggestions: we find out first a) is it Russia? b) does weapon exist? c) does Havana Syndrome exist?
2. Given how conjectural "Havana Syndrome" caused by microwave weapon theory is, it's unnerving to see it being used to advocate hostile action against another country.
3. In some ways, threat inflation on Havana Syndrome is worse than WMD claims in run-up to Iraq war. After all, the non-existent weapons at least were things that we knew exist in some form in the world & CIA was pressured by Bush admin. Here it's conjectural weapon & from CIA
1. This is a good thread on why the dream of an American Orban is a fantasy but the people who it is addressing won't be able to listen because it's premised on working within a democracy and they've given up on democracy.
2. The post-liberal right recognizes they can't win a majority but they also realize (as liberals like @nate_cohn refuse to do) that you can govern in USA as a minority. Lots of leeway to do that through electoral college, gerrymandering & courts. And lots of precedent.
3. As Willmoore Kendall used to say, the true American tradition isn't just the town hall but running someone out on a rail. So, the true American tradition isn't just individualism & democracy but also Jim Crow, courts & Senate thwarting popular majorities, etc.
1. As a whittled down reconciliation bill is in final negotiations, it's worth asking "what's the deal with Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema?" An urgent question not now but for the forseeable future since they'll set the limits on what Democrats can do.
2. Manchin is legible in way that Sinema isn't: he's just a plain old conservative Democrat, willing to horse trade to get pork in his state in exchange for other things he doesn't like. Since his vote is necessary he has leverage and is using it with frustrating ferocity
3. Sinema puzzles people more because she hasn't been upfront about demands and a lot of what she does makes sense politically (evidenced by her sinking poll numbers). Combined with her colorful background (Green Party) & attire, she's presented as a freak. That's a mistake