The strangest manifestation of American conservatives is their earnest belief that the Chinese somehow control their media and politicians, which ironically is a belief fostered by their media and politicians as an ad hominem. In between their media screaming about China and
their politicians practically declaring war on China rhetorically every single day, they still believe this is true. The only explanation is that they are dirty curs, basically whipped dogs who growl at anything but the people actively administering the beatings. They see stuff
like Jim Clancy, fired from CNN for talking about a particular country or Rick Sanchez, also fired, or Marc Lemont Hill, or Fareed Zakaria's groveling public apology, or their politicians regular kow tows to said country and think the Chinese are behind it all. Laughter is second
to well deserved contempt at this type of behavior.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Duke of Qin

Duke of Qin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @qin_duke

16 Nov
The reason I am against the humanization and anthropocentric treatment of pets is because it is a fundamental mistaken value judgement that treats non-human life at the same level as human life. To elevate the moral value of a dog to that of a human is not a sign of benevolence
or moral superiority but rather moral confusion and to degrade the value of a human life to that of a dog's. The human capacity for compassion, rather than an infinite ocean which we imagine it to be, is rather a limited and shallow well. Whenever we as human's pour out a little
of it to others, less remains for every one else. This is a fundamental reality that many people are not willing to acknowledge or accept, but it doesn't stop it from being true. We are not saints or boddhisattva's with limitless compassion. We are human beings with all the flaws
Read 6 tweets
16 Nov
None of these countries really have anything at all in common aside from being enemies America made. Russia, Turkey, and Venezuela actually have elections no more "fortified" than American ones, it's just that they've elected governments the US doesn't like. China really is the
odd man out in that it is an explicit Leninist state without even the pretense of elected representatives. You've got a wannabe Islamic Republic, three non-ideological states, and an official atheist state under the guiding ideology of Marxism-Leninism. It's really a disparate
collection of so-called bad guys. The "good guys" are on the other hand remarkably identical. Representative oligarchic democracies mostly under US military occupation with a nomenklatura comprised of compradors. The real separator between what the US calls good and bad is not
Read 6 tweets
14 Nov
You can tell that the US and it's pets don't give a shit about self determination or popular sovereignty by the complete non reaction by the media, ngo, and think tank circus to the fate of Catalan independence. No black and white dramamentary features on the BBC, no parading of
of separatist sob stories on CNN, no senior analyst fellow arrogantly announcing the end of Spain in the NYT. Not a word from the editorial board at the WaPo how this is a sign of papist tyranny manifesting in the black souls of the Spaniard. Just mass arrests of all the leaders
followed by a quick trial and a dozen years in prison for the lot of people them followed by a pardon after nearly 4 years in jail all dutifully reported once and never ever mentioned again. Western state media works by not on what it reports, but on what it repeats. It is the
Read 5 tweets
11 Nov
The next two decades are going to be the high noon of American stoogery across the world. People don't actually change their opinions but are rather shaped by their formative years for the most part and carry that those preferences and prejudices to their death beds. Those who do
re-evaluate their priors and adopt new positions are few and far between. What the generational shift means is that those who came of age in the late 80s to early 2000's are coming into the prime of their careers. That was the apogee of American power and influence, a proverbial
belle epoque where everything that emanated out of Washington was accepted without reservation as right and proper. This generation came of age where the idealized image of America, both it's intentions and objectives, were uncritically accepted as true (what is known in America
Read 5 tweets
9 Nov
Does it dawn on Europeans that their refugee woes of the last decade are principally the result of the US regime change fairy trying to destabilize governments? Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Turkey, and now Belarus are all situations where US intervention resulted in increased
tension, general chaos, and migrant outflows to Europe. The US doesn't really have to face the consequences courtesy of two oceans but it routinely takes a giant dump on Europe's periphery leaving them smelling the roses so to speak yet from European politicos you would think
that the shit fell out of the sky like mana from heaven or even worse, Putin was somehow responsible. Actions have consequences and even quietly and cowardly going along with US destabilizing ops opens up Europe to pushback. The US failed to color revolution Belarus and is now
Read 4 tweets
7 Nov
Present Anglo nationalism isn't particularly unique. An almost exact historical parallel was the nationalism of the late Hapsburg Empire, except with the ideologies opposite. Rather than revolutionary Liberalism the Hapsburgs espoused a genteel Conservatism of God, King, and the
old order. Other "petty" nationalisms were suppressed but tolerated to the extent where it was more economic too. It did not particularly espouse German nationalism nor did any of elites despite the reality of the monarchy being a German dominated system which everyone was
cognizant of. Likewise the Anglos are not allowed to espouse their nationalist impulses in being Anglos qua Anglos but within the trappings of the empire which they ruled even while subject people's were allowed to, within limits. To say that Anglo Nationalism doesn't exist under
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(