OK - US v. #GhislaineMaxwell jury selection Day 2, afternoon, Judge Alison Nathan (said to be nominated for 2d Cir Court of Appeals) questioning prospective Juror 128. Inner City Press is covering innercitypress.com/sdnytrial20max…
and will live tweet, thread below
Judge Nathan: I'll begin trial on Nov 29 and we estimate six weeks. Can you serve?
Juror: There might be a problem with my job.
Judge Nathan: But you'd still get paid?
Juror: Yes.
Judge Nathan: So it's feasible. You answered that you heard about Ms. Maxwell?
Juror: That she was Epstein's assistant.
Judge Nathan: Could you still be fair?
Juror: Yes.
Next prospective juror also wants to talk Epstein: "He was in Florida, then he was here across the street [meaning the now-empty MCC, across from the SDNY courthouse], and that he died."
Judge Nathan: Could you be fair?
Juror: Yes.
Numbers game:
Now Judge Nathan says, On November 29 we'll start with the first four qualified prospective jurors, for your to exercise peremptory strikes on.
Maxwell's counsel: Starting with the lowest numbers?
Judge Nathan: Yes.
Maxwell's counsel suggested starting from the higher numbers.
Judge Nathan: Why, other than you prefer higher numbers?
Maxwell's lawyer asks if the assignment of numbers was randomized.
Judge Nathan said she thinks so.
Judge Nathan: The peremptories will eat into our trial time. But we'll do them then go straight into opening statements.
Parties ask for a change.
Judge Nathan: I never do it but I will... Going out with a bang.
Judge Nathan: The first 40 will go to 1 courtroom, next 20 to a 2d, for social distancing.
[With COVID still obviously a factor, why is there no public call-in line?!?]
Judge Nathan: I'll have staff, if anyone answers they've heard about the case on social media.
Now an argument is made to Judge Nathan against Juror 27, who spoke about Maxwell's condition of confinement. "This juror obviously knows that the defendant is incarcerated. We would challenge this juror for cause."
Another argument: Most of them, if they've read about the case, know she's incarcerated.
Judge Nathan: Largely because of the defense motions... I'm getting a note from the Jury Department, that numbers were assigned randomly. I will get confirmation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK - now after Charlie Javice found guilty she is arguing to NOT have GPS location monitor put on pending her sentencing - Inner CIty Press wrote the book Fintech Fraudster and will live tweet, thread belowamazon.com/Fintech-Frauds…
All rise!
Judge Hellerstein: I've read the papers.
Javice's lawyer Sullivan: Yes she is a dual citizen but there's no chance she'll flee to France. They have taken her passport. Let me hand you an exhibit about pilates.
Judge: I've had defendants jump bail in the middle of trial. I can't rule out the possibility of flight here. She's never been in this spot before.
Javice's lawyer: She'll be here in August [for sentencing]
Jury entering!
Judge: You have asked what is a reasonable person... It is a concept...
[He cites Hwascar Hernandez, the decedent] If you have further questions, please put them in writing.
[Jury exits]
Thread will continue as developments, below
US v Kay Flock update:
The jury sent the judge another note.
Judge: They want a transcript of my definition of "reasonable person." I'll see it to them. See you for the next note.
Thread will continue as developments, below
OK - now jury deliberates in US v Perez / Kay Flock, in courtroom gallery 30-some supporters, 8 law enforcement, & Inner City Press, covering the case and will tweet below any jury notes, and verdict, intermitent thread below matthewrussellleeicp.substack.com/p/extra-in-bro…
Update 1: at 11:56 am, the first jury note is read out by the Judge: The foreperson will be Juror 1.
That's all.
Judge: See you for the next note.
Unclear when.
Thread will continue for developments
Update 2: as of 2:05 pm, only law enforcement in the courtroom, people in the hall. The word is "nothing," as in, nothing coming out from the jury room.
Again, this thread will continue for developments
OK here's from prosecutors' closing argument:
AUSA: As Vance Brockington told you, Sev Side is a gang... The fact that the defendant is an artist does not absolve him - the defendant can't hide behind his music.
[Multiple songs played]
AUSA holds up guns, shows them to jury; white plastic on one signifies it is not operative
AUSA: This gun killed Hwascar Hernandez... Xavier Rosado, a rival gang member, gives you context -
as does Vance Brockington. He was shot in front of 4646 Park Avenue
OK - now in US v. Perez / Kay Flock trial Day 5, witness is an agent, crossed about video of sidewalk outside park and barbershop. Inner City Press is covering the case and
will live tweet, thread belowpatreon.com/posts/extra-co…
Defense: Mr. Hernandez,was he a member of a gang?
AUSA: Objection!
Judge: Sustained.
Defense: Do you have a view of why Mr Hernandez came out of the barbershop?
AUSA: Objection, lack of foundation.
Judge: Sustained
[Video show, outside barbershop]
Figure in slippers and white socks- Hwascar Hernandez gets shot.
Defense: Did he do something before?
Witness: He appeared to touch his zipper.
OK - now rare Saturday hearing in J.G.G. v. TRUMP in which DDC Chief Judge Boasberg has already issued a temporary restraining order against deporting Tren de Aragua members to Venezuela under the Alien Enemies Act. Inner City Press will live tweet, thread below
Chief Judge Boasberg: This morning when I issued by ruling I was not aware of the President's Proclamation. I understood that planes were to be departing -
AUSA: The five named plaintiffs will not be removed.
CJ Boasberg: Are they on planes to El Salvador?
No, is the answer.
Chief Judge Boasberg: Since you have appealed my ruling, I do not have jurisdiction to re-argue it here. So we will discuss class certification. Government?
AUSA: We opposed class certification, on grounds of venue and authority