1. Undying love exist to the extent you are willing to love your partner. Love isna verb not a noun. It is what ypu do, not how you feel. You chose your partner and pledge to love them and do right by them - that itself is sufficient unto the day of rapture.
The fire don't go out unless you let it. It is your responsibility to intentionally fan it daily and regularly so it doesn't go out. You don't leave the fore to itself and wait to see how itbgoes. It will die. Relationship is hardwork even on the best days.
Like T.D Jakes said, "you have to go to your partner when you are in love. You have to go to them when younare not in love until you are in love."
I've said lot if times that "falling in love" is just emotional attachment. Whether or not that feeling is there, love your partner
Do right by them always. That is the only way to strgethen the bond of affection and intimacy that binds you. Love is not butterfly in the stomach. Love is responsibility.
The reason people lose interest in the long run is because they stopped working on loving their partner.
Like iPhone, you are thirsting after a new experience someone you've not experienced and so you work on your new emotional attraction to satisfy your lust until the flames dies again and then the circle continues.
To love is to commit and Commitment is intentional.
2. Love is not a mental construct. "Falling in love" is. Love is responsibility.
For God so loved the world that he gave...
Jn 3:16
You cannot love without giving. To love is to give yourself to the benefit of another. Invest your time, body, resources, emotions in your partner
Emotions are fickle and unreliable. It is not a strong foundation of love. Romantic novels and Hollywood has messed up people's concept of love but my hope is that this generation gets more responsible with their matrimonial responsibilities because we need healthy family system.
The reason relationship and marriages suffer is because of the reasons for going into them - someone to take care if you, sexual satisfaction, emotional attraction (till it wears off), who is available, among other flimsy reasons.
Your choice is fine but be committed to it.
Commiting to it is where the problem is because in the long run, you realize this is not sustainable unless you want to keep up appearances.
Relationship/Marriage is your greatest life decision.
So choose who is willing to go the distance with you in privilege and disprivilege, in convenience and inconvenience, who put family above self, who understands there is no Me but Us in marriage.
When you are wilfully committed, you intentionally seek to do right by your partner
When the foundation is right and you have a sense of responsibility, you leave no chance of monetary or sexual attraction to break the bond of intimacy you share with a partner.
You'll marry once and marry right. I trust the God of all grace to bring you into matrimonial bliss🙏
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Within the home, leadership is gendered. A man must govern the house irrespectiveof who earns more. The problem with this generation is that we are money obsessed but money is not the value on which a home a built. Money is for bills and comfort.
Family values is the most important value in building a home. There is no personal income in marriage irrespectiveof who earns more. All income are family income and should be expended in the best interest of the home.
As a man, you have to govern your home financially, spiritually, emotionally, making decisions in the best interest of family, sacrificing yourself for the benefit of wife and kids, loving and treating your wife right, raising Godly children on your personal and spiritual values
People who judge hypergamy seems to do it emotionally because of the monetary weight. But hypergampus people are also taking a risk people don't talk about.
They have chosen wealth as priority, all other factors less considered. The man could be good or toxic. Still a risk
This was why I asked the question last week:
Do.ypunwantba rich man all other facts less considered or a good man, all other factors less considered. Some people said both but we know that means rich at the risk of his personality.
You accept the love ypunthink you deserve.
Money is not the factor for determining happiness. It is a factor for determining who is more comfortable and primed for sorting bills.
To determine happiness, there has to be an indepth comparative study of the relationships in view. Happiness doesn't show by appearance.
Some men think they can't be infertile because they ejaculate. Some see it as a shame that they are infertile and so they cover the truth and the ignorant wen thinks it is her fault. Some women hide the truth about being infertile because she wants to marry and remain married.
So the guilty party keeps quiet while their partner is hoping from pillar to post praying and seeking alternative solutions.
I don't think the lady should have deleted the video. However, there are nuances attached to these thing. Most ladies into transactional sex are not as proud or shameless as they project. Exposing her like that must have brought shame to her and her love ones/guardians.
We talk a lot about actions and consequences but people prefer delusions because delusions are comforting. It is fine if you want to prostitute but please ensure you can stand the heat that comes with living in this clime if publicly ousted.
While there is no pride in prostitution, they form a big part of the society. They render an underrated service for which demand is always high.
Once again, this shows that men and women will never be judged the same way.
The replies under the romantic exchange with Ada were not uncommon and frankly, not unexpected. I have seen similar responses under my old tweets when I am being light hearted.
Dickson focus, we are losing a patriarchy king, so you can be romantic?
Comments like this reinforces the perception that I am this stonewall, tough, unemotional person and it is why some ladies think I am unapproachable or look like someone who doesn't give to relate with women.
I have stated consistently that Masculinity and Patriarchy is not hate for women. It is not a fight against women. It is practically impossible to hate the other gender you share the world with and it is stupid to even think of doing so.
They say a life of love will have some thorns but a life without love will have no roses. At the risk of being pricked, can I hold on to you as my rose in thorny sides. I don't mean to emotionally waterboard you but you arouse my intellect as well as my loins.
I promise to always look at you through rose coloured glasses and course-correct you with kisses when you're being knuckle headed. You have been the entire point of my life and the only time I have seen you angry is when you should have been angrier.
The only women I'll love more than you would call you mummy. I promise to keep to our deal of picking each bother from the airports. Even if love takes in a new meaning, I promise to spell it with your name. I promise never to stop kissing your forehead every morning.