Vinay Profile picture
18 Nov, 6 tweets, 2 min read
It’s really hard to look at the 20th century and come to that conclusion.

Lifespans got longer. Populations rose.

We wiped out half of the remaining nature, invented atomic and biological weapons, built a total surveillance society.

Are you sure this is going to be alright?
And this is kind of my problem. I was yelling about the need for masks and research into mask effectiveness in pandemics >10 years ago

20 years into the work on climate refugees. 20 years of “we have to prepare to save the lives of hundreds of millions, homes destroyed by floods
When these things arrive, the “optimists” say “my god who could have predicted this unprecedented event” because *their optimism is rooted in avoiding the data about obvious possible risks*.

Add survivor biases, and we have a risk blind incredibly rich pundit class misleading us
They simply ignored risks and placed their bets. 10,000 start, 10 get rich and the rest go broke, and now everything that comes out of their mouths is perfumed wisdom.

It is very easy to confuse smart and lucky when you’re the one sitting in the mansion drinking white wine.
This top tier of risk blind pathologist optimists are the people that Warren Buffet and Ray Dalio made extremely reliable fortunes beating out in the long run.

Big funds can afford to wait for the luck to run out and hoover up the remains.

Watch the patient money. Always watch.
Climate change, viewed through the lens of techno optimism, is a problem for the next generation to fix.

“We can’t fix this cheaply and easily yet, so it’s clearly a problem to be solved easily tomorrow with the tech we will invent soon!”

Do you know the term “technical debt”?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vinay

Vinay Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @leashless

18 Nov
So I want to talk a bit about being a climate-aware CEO.

I don't mean the daffy greenwashing version, "we're switching to recycled packaging to do our part."

No, I mean a hardcore "we've broken the world and now we pay" type of climate aware CEO. It's a different kind of mind.
I'm running a company to save lives. Not directly, I'm not making HIV vaccines. I'm running a company to make money, and then I'm going to spend that money saving lives.

Maybe some of our technology will help but that's very much a bonus: goal is vast world-transforming wealth.
We're talking "man who fell to earth" levels of wealth. I figure there are going to be hundreds of millions of climate refugees, and the UN etc. will be totally disorganised and shambolic, as they are now.

Enter philanthropy. $1bn saves 1m families, say. lateralaction.com/articles/the-m…
Read 13 tweets
18 Nov
I've been thinking really hard about people's inability to stare at the darkness of the world and the fate of the poor, without blinking.

It all seems pretty obvious to me: the central fact of human existence is that 5 or 10 million people starve to death each year. The core.
Everything that we do is set against the background.

Everything that we do is set against the constant drum beat of other humans starving to death. Maybe one every ten seconds. I hear that clock. That clock is with me. I wake up with it, I fall asleep with it. Brain won't block.
My brain won't block it because I trained my brain not to: I am "enlightened" - a human that has punched through its own programming. Freedom, certainly, but also awareness - and in that awareness one has a few choices.
Read 25 tweets
10 Sep
God, I'm tired of trying to persuade people not to destroy their world, and to take care of the victims of prior attempts to destroy it.

People want to stay asleep at the wheel, in their comfy little ruts, even though they are two wheels off the cliff already.

It's Panic Time!
What does it take to move people's attention off their wallets or petty political rivalries on to the core question of the day: how do we regulate technology so that it doesn't destroy all of our lives?

That's the core issue: global warming, mass surveillance, combat robots.
I ploughed this territory 10 years ago, and published Mother of Hydrogen, an SF novel about how the human race survives nanotech and biotech wars, and manages a rogue AI problem.

hexayurt.com/novel

The solution proposed in that book is the only one I believe will work.
Read 28 tweets
8 Sep
Bull and bear markets mean something different at a two trillion dollar market cap.

You've gotta understand we're turning an enormous ship here. A bull/bear event *now shifts the destiny of nations* not just your college/house/retirement fund. It's a dramatic world-shifting tide
What does that mean?

Well, we still don't have fundamentals - it's almost impossible to evaluate what bitcoin *should* be worth. Everybody's evaluating it based on what it will be worth in future.

That paradox is the most dangerous thing in crypto. We *desperately* need utility
I *started* @mattereum to solve the utility problem, by the way: you wanna buy houses, cars, gold, vacations, wine, art, you name it *in a crypto-native way* we do that

Not "turn your BTC into dollars on the fly". I mean we sell physical stuff *as a cryptographic rights bundle*
Read 6 tweets
22 Aug
I want to talk about why I'm so bone-deep hostile to the "consciousness movement" while being a life-long meditator.

First, an appropriate soundtrack for this little bit of thinking

Thread on.
So the consciousness movement has basically two phases which are relevant to this discussion. Pre-nuclear bombs and other existential risks, and post-nuclear bombs etc

The movement slips over that historical discontinuity with very little notice but something fundamental breaks.
Before the invention of the nuclear bomb there is no potential for human beings to destroy the plane of existence we occupy.

It simply wasn't a thing. We could cut down a tree, but we could not extinguish all life. Once that became possible, there was a half-assed attempt to fix
Read 54 tweets
5 Aug
I find myself wondering this morning how many people actually get my work - here we are, 20 years in to me continually writing, teaching, communicating, building - and I can't tell if a lot of people get it and are mostly quiet or if very few people actually got it.

Which is it?
It probably helps if I define it: here is my best short summary.

1) The human race is currently running the world like a death camp for poor humans, and particularly for the other species we farm or drive into extinction.

2) Fixing this situation is possible, but requires will.
That's the core thesis. Then,

3) It is possible, by mass collaboration using any available mechanism (open source, markets, new religious movements etc.) to live without this continuous catastrophic violence.

Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(