@WHO director of communications suggests that we need 'a consensus on terminology'; i.e. meaning of the word 'airborne'.

Logical possibilities:

1. She's right: 'airborne' has so many meanings as to render its use invalid.

2. She's wrong: 'airborne' has a single, clear meaning.
🚨 Dictionary evidence

Does this indicate multiple, potentially conflicting meanings, or a single, clear meaning?
🚨 Evidence from WHO teams' use

2014: IPC of epidemic & pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections in health care

'The spread of an infectious agent caused by the dissemination of droplet nuclei that remain infectious when suspended in air over long distances and time. (9)'
🚨 Reference 9 from the 2014 WHO IPC guideline: source

@Don_Milton: when writing this 2004 perspective piece triggered by proven airborne transmission of SARS, DID NOT seek to question the meaning of the word 'airborne'.

And in 2014, WHO teams were happy using it too.
🚨 July 2020 SARS2 IPC Scientific Brief

'Airborne transmission is defined as the spread of an infectious agent caused by the dissemination of droplet nuclei (aerosols) that remain infectious when suspended in air over long distances & time.(11)'

'aerosols' = only diff from 2014
🚨 Reference 11: source?

The 2014 IPC of epidemic & pandemic-prone acute respiratory infections in health care: WHO Guideline

Getting boring isn't it?

WHO teams are soooo comfortable with their use of the word 'airborne' w.r.t. IPC, that they keep quoting their own definition.
🚨 SARS-CoV-2 & the role of airborne transmission: a systematic review (v2, 6th Sept 2021)

[You know, the one sponsored by WHO & denying airborne transmission, rejected due to reviewer concerns over flawed methodology.]

Link:
f1000research.com/articles/10-23…
🚨 'Airborne transmission is defined as the spread of an infectious agent caused by the dissemination of droplet nuclei (aerosols) that remain infectious when suspended in air over long distances & time(1).

IDENTICAL to the July 2020 Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Scientific Brief
@gabbystern I respectfully suggest that the evidence above demonstrates a consensus on 'airborne' terminology dating back to 2004, with WHO teams consistently using near identical wording in multiple publications, most recently Sept 6th 2021.
Given this consensus:

'Airborne transmission is defined as the spread of an infectious agent caused by the dissemination of droplet nuclei (aerosols) that remain infectious when suspended in air over long distances & time'

WHY suggest the need for 'a consensus on terminology'?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David R Tomlinson 💙

David R Tomlinson 💙 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DRTomlinsonEP

18 Nov
Coronavirus: how to stay safe and help prevent the spread - GOV.UK

This guidance needs to be reported for misinformation.

As ever during this pandemic, the 🇬🇧 medico-political complex display an aversion to reporting empirical truths. gov.uk/guidance/covid…
THE GOOD

✅ ‘Airborne transmission is a very significant way that the virus circulates.’

Correct: aerosols are formed & exhaled during breathing, speech, singing, coughing & sneezing.

Can you live without breathing? Image
THE BAD

☣️ Symptoms requiring PCR testing STILL reflect the BS affirmed by @CMO_England in May 2020 based on data marred by selection bias: ISARICA4.

These data should NEVER have been used to prop up erroneously narrow test criteria.
@ProfCalumSemple now agrees: BMJ, July 2021! Image
Read 7 tweets
18 Nov
Canada admits aerosols are major source of COVID-19 transmission after nearly two years of denying it wsws.org/en/articles/20…
‘The PHAC’s belated admission constitutes a devastating indictment of the political establishment’s prioritization of corporate profits over human life, which has gone hand-in-hand with a systematic repudiation of a science-based response to the virus.’ @trishgreenhalgh @Ozbilgin
Guidance change ‘on the quiet’: sound familiar?
@doctorsoumya @mvankerkhove @DrMikeRyan @DrTedros ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
'Bold action is now needed to ensure that the science of SARS-CoV-2 transmission is freed from the shackles of historical errors, scientific vested interests, ideological manipulation & policy satisficing.'
authorea.com/users/316109/a…
Thank you @trishgreenhalgh & @Ozbilgin 🙏💙 Image
'Policymakers should actively seek to broaden the scientific inside track to support interdisciplinarity & pluralism as a route to better policies, greater accountability & a reduction in the huge inequities that the pandemic has generated.' @kprather88
authorea.com/users/316109/a…
Read 4 tweets
16 Nov
If true, why would you allow the Chair of the @WHO IPC R&D Expert Group for COVID-19 to co-author & release a preprint which denies airborne transmission?

Version 2 was even released 24hrs BEFORE your front page changed: WHO's first overt acceptance of aerosol transmission! Image
@doctorsoumya were you aware that in this same airborne-denial preprint, Dr Conly [Chair of the @WHO IPC R&D Expert Group for COVID-19] et al attempt to re-write history?

🚨 They basically try to undermine the concept that SARS1 was airborne, contradicting the WHO stance on SARS ImageImageImage
@doctorsoumya were you aware that in this same airborne-denial preprint, Dr Conly et al attempt to re-write the scientific record on aerosol creation by humans?

They claim that aerosol creation [beyond AGPs] is as easy & likely as putting a human into orbit.

Is this acceptable? ImageImageImageImage
Read 5 tweets
10 Nov
@mancunianmedic @bmj_latest I think with 1,500 HCWs dead, over 120,000 with long covid & NHS Trusts still anchored on droplet transmission beyond AGPs, you've got a right to be angry.

You mention the pandemic stockpile lacking necessary supplies. I agree.

I hope you don't mind my 2c...
@mancunianmedic @bmj_latest In advance of PPE re-procurement, Spring 2016, the NERVTAG ‘Sub-committee on the pandemic influenza Facemasks & Respirators stockpile’ recommended that ‘fluid repellent surgical masks (FRSM) could be used for the majority of clinical care on normal wards during a pandemic...
@mancunianmedic @bmj_latest ...escalating to respirators for AGPs.’

In contrast, for MERS Coronavirus, FFP3 respirators were required for all HCWs, but as MERS was not deemed to have pandemic potential, stockpiling for this purpose was not deemed necessary.

SARS was not considered.
Read 13 tweets
9 Nov
Tue 7 Sept 2021, 10:57

WHO described SARS2 as a cough & sneeze droplet-transmitted virus

Prevention: 'wash your hands, don't touch your face'

At 12:37: #COVIDisAirborne!
'[emitted] small liquid particles...droplets to smaller aerosols'

Prevention: 'wear a mask'

Did you know? 7th Sept WHO guidance ancho...ImageImageImage
WHO anti-airborne starting point:

'The COVID-19 virus spreads primarily through droplets of saliva or discharge from the nose when an infected person coughs or sneezes' Image
WHO anti-airborne: prevention

🤦‍♂️Wash your hands regularly with soap & water, or clean them with alcohol-based hand rub.
🤔Maintain at least 1m distance between you & people coughing or sneezing [Ed: what about breath-exhaled aerosols; & why 1m?!].
🤦‍♂️Avoid touching your face. Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(