If more people in mainstream media or financial media played video games, @Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick would be under so much pressure to resign there'd be a countdown clock on @CNBC.
This man:
* Lied about what he knew about sexual harassment at his company, *to his board*, about things that would result in massive lawsuits against the company.
* Left a voice mail threatening to have his female assistant killed (which he's admitted to)
* Promoted a woman to "co-leader" of Blizzard, only to have her leave *3 months* later citing "tokenism" and unfair pay.
* Made a different woman at the company send out an email defending the company, *that he wrote* and then said the email was in bad taste once it went bad
Over 1,000 employees staged a walkout to demand his resignation
I'm just saying, if people understood this as the CEO of a "major tech company" instead of a "video game" company the calls would be deafening and the story would be part of most mainstream broadcasts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m not sure what people want Biden to say. We’re on the “not” vigilante justice team.
Besides, Biden has his chance to address this with his pick for AG, he picked Garland, Garland didn’t do bugger all about *the cop* who shot the dude in the back.
That’s the problem.
Meanwhile, half of the people out here gave Harris blowback for being a prosecutor, what the hell do people want now, for her to be MORE prosecutorial and say “screw this double jeopardy, we ride at dawn.”???
Sometimes, the bad guys win. If you’re mad about that, FIX THE SYSTEM.
But to do that folks need to hold the thought in their head for MORE THAN TWO WEEKS.
I could write about fixing the courts a month from now and most people will tell me to go get f***ed w/o Machinema.
I am now listening to white people Columbus the right of self-defense... as if it's EVER BEEN A QUESTION whether violent white people have the right to shoot people they don't like.
FUCKING HOBBES defends the right of self-defense EVEN WHEN THE STATE TRIES TO KILL YOU
The question was never "do white people have a right to self defense" the question was always "do white people have the right to self defense after they show up with a gun looking to shoot someone."
And, not surprisingly, a bunch of white people are like "sure, why not?"
The extent to which Democrats have lost the midterms before the midterms have even started, because Democrats did not restore the Voting Rights Act, fix the Census, or do anything about gerrymandering, is underreported somehow.
Like, we can "debate" on stupid Twitter about "Shor-ism" or CRT or whatever the hell else floats people's boats for a week. But this battle has largely been fought AND LOST without Democrats ever really taking the field.
What's wild is that people, otherwise serious and knowledgeable people, will be gearing up to have "takes" on how the midterms were a "referendum" on some thing or another.
IT'S A REFERENDUM ON MAP MAKING. And the GOP WON. A WHILE AGO.
The rest is shouting.
In the meantime, Mark Meadows (who was allegedly cooperating) decided to skip out on his deposition, so I supposed we're, what, a month now from him being indicted too?
*Now* we can play the game I explained a month ago:
"A criminal contempt proceeding is essentially a prosecution for noncompliance with the law. It doesn’t really exist to make witnesses testify but to punish people who do not. It’s a criminal proceeding, just like any other"...
"The defendant is entitled to a fair jury trial and an appeals process. The whole thing could take years, even if Bannon is found guilty of criminal contempt. Which itself is not a sure thing: The last official who was indicted for criminal contempt was acquitted."
People who care about civil rights and civil liberties would be demanding that Rusten Sheskey, the police officer who shot Jacob Blake six times in the back, be brought to justice.
People like Glenn are demanding that white boys get away with murder.
If you, like Glenn, find a whole lot of energy to try to free Rittenhouse, but can't find that same gear to hold cops accountable, I'm allowed to assume that you, like Glenn, are in it for the permissiveness of white violence, and not criminal justice reform.
These people defending Garland's inaction are like the LemonLyman club who would defend Josh Lyman's *secret plan* to fight inflation.
If Garland had empaneled a Grand Jury, we'd know it, just like we know when Cy Vance does.
If Garland or the FBI had interviewed key Congressional conspirators, we'd know it, because these people love complaining to Fox every time something bad happens to them.
If Garland were serious about holding everybody accountable for trying to overthrow the government, we wouldn't have ACTUALLY JUDGES complaining that the sentence recommendations FROM THE DOJ'S PROSECUTORS are too light.