#DAX Hello friends! Like I said yesterday, time to review...

TP1 (Main) ✅

I put these images, but I recommend carefully reading all the previous tweets

And now... Long thread (again🤦🏻‍♂️😂) 👇
1) Yesterday:

We briefly traded below 16224, but it was not the time to go to TP1 (intraday levels aside, unpublished)

Important to see as I had already commented, that after that it was not ruled out to go back to the top (see image above)
Essential factor ➡️ OPEX

Context is very important

You must never forget the importance of OPEX, never ... but even less when that moment is close

Any bearish movement is stopped yesterday afternoon, and then ...
2) Overnight:

The closer the OPEX is, everything is more speculative

If you look closely, you can see that practically half of that nightly bullish movement occurs in 1 minute...

Remember:

Speculation ➡️ OPEX ➡️ Context
Understanding this, it's easily deductible that there was certain interest in driving the price up before the OPEX ends

Half of the movement in a minute at the time when it's easier to move the market with fewer contracts...

There are no coincidences, there are causalities
3)From 8:00 am (real market) the movement becomes clearly bearish

It should be noted here that despite the nightly speculation, the price has not reached 20 points above the indicated zone all week, and to which I made reference that the price could return before the OPEX
4)At least 3 clear opportunities to short (in case of being already out of the initial trade, I will comment on this below) or to start a new trade, add shorts ... it depends on each one

Perfect example of "Second Chance"

Notice how from that moment, despite the high volatility, the 16224/47 zone has acted as perfect resistance, as I had pointed out in previous days

Seen like this, everything is relatively simple and if you haven't been able to trade it, you will probably hate what I'm writing...
Ok, I get it, that's why I will try to delve into what I see 👇

➡️First, the context is important (already explained) you can't forget that

➡️I was able to capture this morning a general feeling of frustration ... shorts closed in losses and disappointment ➡️ no more trading
Very important topic:

➡️Technically:

A) no more than 20 points above 16281

B)Second chance "probably the best entry"

(A and B already commented)
C) SL and BE

This is a complex issue, the use of SL is widely extended (as tight as possible) and the recommendation to put positions in BE whenever possible as quickly as possible

Ok, I respect that, and I have nothing against who makes really profitable use of it
But if you use it regularly you have to know:

1)Why do you use it?

2)Consequences?

You will answer: "to minimize losses"

Right?
If you answer that, you haven't answered either of the two questions ...

You will have answered "for what?" and I didn't ask you that, because I already knew that
1)You use it because you are previously assuming that your % of successes in the trades is low, so you usually protect your trades quickly

Perfect, it's a way of being consistent in the markets, widely demonstrated
Obviously for that you have to know your trading perfectly and know that it is indeed like that (have you tried it?)

Here a perfect example 👇
Maybe it's not the best option for your trading or for your usual trades, especially BE

A BE too early,on many occasions cancels big trades

In general, over-adjusting an SL in an OPEX week is largely responsible for the frustration it generates in many traders this type of week
IMO, adjusting the SL too much is not suitable for everyone (and even less on OPEX week)

You must be a great expert in it, especially in cutting trades and re-entering

There are very successful traders using this technique, they are fully adapted to it
2) Consequences:

In this case, it must be completely normal for you to leave, enter, re-enter, exit from the trades again

It should be something everyday, therefore there can be no feeling of frustration due to a failed trade
➡️Psychology:

Returning to the current trade, there can be no frustration or blasphemy against the market

This makes no sense...

If you understand the context and the technical section (both explained) this cannot exist today
Also, the market until today has been in a very small range ... yes it has had a significant loss with that nightly bullish movement ... then you are over-leveraged

You are breaching the other trading key ➡️ Risk Management
In short (excessively long thread):

➡️Know the context

➡️Know your trading style

➡️No emotions involved, just a plan to execute

➡️Adequate risk management
My opinion: generally many people trade too much time and work very little in all of the above...

Remember that this is and will always be a long-distance race and you should try harder than in any other job

Try to invert the balance trading/study and work 😉
And now after this long thread (I've actually tried to summarize as much as possible 😅😂)

Like every Friday, I want to wish you all a great weekend 😎

Friday's song:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Makaveli

Makaveli Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MakaveliDAX

18 Nov
As part of these nightly tweets that I do these days ... today:

THE BAD TRADER

The bad trader makes a series of generally known mistakes, today I will try to delve a little into mistakes generally less obvious to some traders 👇
1)The bad trader chases the price, always follows the price in the markets movements

2)The bad trader denotes excitement on the days when the market makes important movements, loses control over itself
3)The bad trader overreacts to market movements (generally bullish), leaning rapidly (see point 2) to movements opposite (generally bearish) to the important previous movement, usually with too optimistic (unreal) expectations
Read 6 tweets
17 Nov
#DAX Just my two cents 👇

It's usually a sign that the market will continue bullish, but...

It' one of those excessively extreme cases for me...

In excessively extreme retail sentiment situations, there is often a decrease in the spread between longs and shorts

There are basically 3 ways to do this
1)New bullish momentum, forcing to close many open shorts

Even slight increase in lengths (IMO, longs opened too late, fewer chances of success)
Read 8 tweets
16 Nov
#DAX Update

In case someone is in a similar situation 👇, I will try to better clarify what was previously explained:

16247/24 (previously long TP) I want to use it as the main shorts zone

16268/81 is a theoretical intraday resistance (less important than the previous one but can be useful)

➡️Most bullish case: few points above 16281 no shorts

➡️Around 16268/81 zone rejected➡️ 16247/24

Two things happen here:

A)16247/24 support: Short risk above 16281
B)break below 16224: short move activated (Risk above 16247, without completely ruling out a spike to the upper zone next days)

TPs:

➡️16072/49 (Main) (adjustable to 16100/72 for preferibly this week)

➡️Under these circumstances, TP2 15896/73 is feasible for next week
Read 4 tweets
29 Oct
#DAX

(1/16)

Some explanations using the latest proposed bearish trade

Probably some traders do something similar, or will do it in another way, they may even disagree...

It doesn't matter, it is just my vision and I think it can be a help for other traders
(2/16)

CHART 1:

Simply the evolution of the trade and all the zones and indications proposed

Highlight Moment: When TP1 hit and price rapidly bounces, a common temptation is to expect a strong bullish momentum, in the session and in the medium term

Reality was very different
(3/16)

LOOKING FOR THE BEST POSITION

(associated risks)

➡️Option 1:

Too close to the bullish option, apparently better positioning, but more chance of failure

There is no significant reference level above

(Remember that for me, above 15760 DAX should reach 15850/900 easily)
Read 16 tweets
30 Jun
#DAX My psychology...

This is a time when many of you think, after a 150 point trade (respecting my TPs), that you have to continue in the market ... some thinking about bigger falls, others about buying the bounce, right?
For me, here are three long-term psychological failures to be consistent:

➡️Overtrading

➡️Too greedy

➡️Chase the price
For me the main move is done, all TPs reached and the probable intraday buy zones have too much risk in this market situation (understanding the market context is very important, and very difficult too)

In fact, first buy zone is broken (15550),and the second is far away (15409)
Read 10 tweets
29 Jun
#DAX Hello friends!

Finally, 9 days after this tweet, this is the final result

I have not been very active, but as I said everything was in this Chart (even without intraday adjustments)

Since then my messages have been:

The main move was the previous Monday

Tight range afterwards, little volatility and many traders' paradise

I warned of the fake, 2/3 hours before

Bullish targets intact if 15506/486 zone held
If you were smart and used these zones and levels + understanding my messages, everything will have gone well😉

Recently I have seen that every time I go to Twitter I have lost followers 😱😂 so instead of "welcome new followers" I say "goodbye old followers" 👋😂😂
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(