So US News releases its global ranking of Colleges/Universities.

No University in India is in the top 400. Only one is in the top 500. No IIT is in the top 500.

India's "English Advantage" paying rich dividends? Or is it the success of "social justice"?

usnews.com/education/best…
In Asia, universities from China, with Chinese-medium, dominate. Other Asian countries, using their own languages, also excel. (Singapore is city-sized—an outlier).

No Indian University is in the top 50 in Asia. "English advantage" in higher education? 😆
usnews.com/education/best…
A few Indian graduates do well abroad due to the sheer selectivity ratio. Of the 1.3 billion population .0001% may succeed in this manner, just because in such a large set there will be some brilliant people who succeed *despite* the education system.

Even if that were a metric, what percent of Global Fortune 500 CEOs are from India relative to the proportion of Indians in the world? What percent of top 1000 companies are Indian or Indian-owned?

It's the stupidest example. Singapore is the size of a city. No lessons can be gleaned from that. No major country in the world excludes a majority of its population from development by denying them education in their language.

The rankings are not perfect. But when a dozen Chinese universities are in the top 200, and no Indian university even in the top 400, it is dumb to ignore the data.

There are many other data points, including the number of AI patents China is filing.

Lol, "English advantages" wallahs tout the advantage of English in India for higher education and research? But this "advantage" does not show up in any objective criteria like citations, how come? 😆

Check Nobel Prizes from Japan in last 10 years.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sankrant

8 Nov
We've adopted "cutting the cake" for birthdays. This originates from Christian weddings, where "cutting the wedding cake actually represents breaking the bride's hymen." (for end of virginity).

We Indians copy blindly just like we sing "ring-a-ringa roses" uncomprehendingly.
Similarly "blowing candles" is a very un-Indic ritual. In a Christian context it represents the extinguishing of life for that many years.

In Hindu rituals, agni is honored. We light a lamp and keep it burning, representing wisdom and eternal life.

brightside.me/wonder-curiosi…
Read 4 tweets
7 Nov
Once you sign-up for mandates, expect the governments to keep telling you what to inject into your bodies. Or else.
The state does not need much of an excuse at expanding its control over people.

What's bizarre is the capitulation of the "liberals" with governments dictating what to do to our bodies. What happened to "my body, my choice?"

But then liberals have also become the #1 apologists for Islamism, hardly anything more bizarre than that.

euronews.com/2021/07/26/who… Image
Read 4 tweets
7 Nov
As far as I can tell the entire "farmer's agitation" is about rich landowners who have a nexus with mandi monopolies.

Poor and marginalized farmers stand. to benefit from the reforms. But the rich can fund trends like #WhyModiAgainstIndia.
A large majority of farmers across India support the unshackling of Indian agriculture.

But a small fraction wants the cartel to continue. They also have money and muscle power as big landowners. No surprise that they're lynching small dalit farmers.

I've not heard a single argument against the farm law reform which is not based on speculation and fear-mongering. If there is, I'm happy to listen. These kind of arguments make no sense.

How exactly does the ability to sell anywhere hinder farmers?

Read 4 tweets
5 Nov
The "liberal" discourse in India is to cater to the powerful claiming to speak for "marginalized."

1. The concern for "tribals" is not for those who'd resist Christian conversion. It is to sever cultural ties and show Hindus as enemy to aid $powerful evangelical conversion war.
2. The concern for "dalits" is not because they care the least for "dalits." If they did, they'd have been agitating for the removal of Article 370, which deprived Dalits of rights in J&K they got elsewhere. But they *opposed* that. Why? To serve the agenda of powerful Islamism.
3. The narrative on "atrocities on dalits" is for a singular purpose. A stick to beat Hindus with to aid powerful #ChristoIslam. This is why they bury the many cases of Muslim atrocities on Dalit Hindus. It doesn't serve the agenda of the powerful.

indiafacts.org/hhrr
Read 8 tweets
5 Nov
The Puritan ideology of Protestant Christianity dubbed all expenditure on entertainment as "wasteful", indeed anything used for other than the glory of the Christian God.

"Modern Hindus" replicate these arguments determining what is "wasteful" in how others spend their money.
When the British Empire impoverished India by draconian taxation, destruction of industry and colonial loot, villagers still managed to scrounge up some money for the wedding of their children.

The British then dubbed wedding expenditure as "wasteful" and the *cause* of poverty.
The same arguments are replicated by the colonial courts and the colonial Indian state to civilize the natives and control who they should be allowed to spend their own money.

indianexpress.com/article/opinio…
Read 5 tweets
4 Nov
Romila Thapar's ancestor Kunj Behari Thapar was awarded the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire in 1920 for his loyalty. The slavery runs deep.
Yes, this is very true. Pretty much the entire "elite class" in India, those who were wealthy and in power at the time of Independence were collaborators of the British.
Those who truly rebelled were impoverished, their lands taken, livelihoods destroyed.

Then those who'd been collaborators branded themselves as "freedom fighters" and wrote their own hagiography and faked the history of the real freedom struggle.

Read book "Netaji" which documents, from British archives, what caused the British to leave.

garudabooks.com/netaji-indias-…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(