The Puritan ideology of Protestant Christianity dubbed all expenditure on entertainment as "wasteful", indeed anything used for other than the glory of the Christian God.

"Modern Hindus" replicate these arguments determining what is "wasteful" in how others spend their money.
When the British Empire impoverished India by draconian taxation, destruction of industry and colonial loot, villagers still managed to scrounge up some money for the wedding of their children.

The British then dubbed wedding expenditure as "wasteful" and the *cause* of poverty.
The same arguments are replicated by the colonial courts and the colonial Indian state to civilize the natives and control who they should be allowed to spend their own money.

indianexpress.com/article/opinio…
Extravagant weddings by the rich are simply transfer of money from the rich to all those employed in the wedding industry. It is great for the economy and supports a lot of livelihoods.

But the Puritan ethic dubs it as "wasteful." We don't need to be converted. We already are.
So much of what "modern" Indians repeat, both from the Left and so-called "Right" is recycled Protestant theology.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sankrant

5 Nov
The "liberal" discourse in India is to cater to the powerful claiming to speak for "marginalized."

1. The concern for "tribals" is not for those who'd resist Christian conversion. It is to sever cultural ties and show Hindus as enemy to aid $powerful evangelical conversion war.
2. The concern for "dalits" is not because they care the least for "dalits." If they did, they'd have been agitating for the removal of Article 370, which deprived Dalits of rights in J&K they got elsewhere. But they *opposed* that. Why? To serve the agenda of powerful Islamism.
3. The narrative on "atrocities on dalits" is for a singular purpose. A stick to beat Hindus with to aid powerful #ChristoIslam. This is why they bury the many cases of Muslim atrocities on Dalit Hindus. It doesn't serve the agenda of the powerful.

indiafacts.org/hhrr
Read 8 tweets
4 Nov
Romila Thapar's ancestor Kunj Behari Thapar was awarded the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire in 1920 for his loyalty. The slavery runs deep.
Yes, this is very true. Pretty much the entire "elite class" in India, those who were wealthy and in power at the time of Independence were collaborators of the British.
Those who truly rebelled were impoverished, their lands taken, livelihoods destroyed.

Then those who'd been collaborators branded themselves as "freedom fighters" and wrote their own hagiography and faked the history of the real freedom struggle.

Read book "Netaji" which documents, from British archives, what caused the British to leave.

garudabooks.com/netaji-indias-…
Read 4 tweets
3 Nov
Many more animals are killed every day due to the existence of roads and highways.

Not to mention that some religions literally have an animal-slaughter festival.

But these people get very worried about Diwali. 🙄
Are you a moron? Diwali animal deaths are "intentional" not "accidental"?

How about slaughter-festival deaths?

And how many animals "die" due to Diwali vs roads or the slaughter-festival. Figures please, else you just show up like a silly propagandist.

Read 7 tweets
3 Nov
Anyone in Austria want to go check out the Lambach Abbey? Apparently this is where Hitler was exposed to the "Hooked Cross" which he later turned into the Nazi symbol.

This was translated as "Swastika" by the English translator of Mein Kampf. Image
They have a lot to hide and feel ashamed for.

Read 4 tweets
1 Nov
Do they serve dog meat? The Chinese do. Why not?

Think for a change, deracinated wannabe @saliltripathi. 😏 @MrsGandhi
Countries have cultural norms. The culture-less can't understand this.

When massah says "jump" they ask, "how high." In their limited vision, cultural norms are set by the West. They just jump.

So they'd never ask why horse-meat isn't sold at Costco.

cbsnews.com/news/why-dont-…
It shouldn't take a lot of comprehension.

The relationship to cows in India have been akin to family members, not unlike the relationship in the West to dogs and horses as "pets." People generally don't eat those considered family. Every culture has their own taboos.
Read 12 tweets
28 Oct
So hard to find good editors for English. Interviewed a candidate today who is working as an editor elsewhere. Studied 12 years in English-medium, CBSE, MSc, B.Ed. Her resume itself had errors in every line.

(And you want to convert 1.3 billion people to English-medium? 😏).
India's English obsession is creating linguistic cripples. I asked her if she could edit or write in Hindi, but she said her Hindi is worse.

Foisting an alien language has meant we are not good in any language. The natural ability of mother-tongue proficiency is destroyed.
Another candidate I interviewed, also from English-medium, spoke eloquently about this problem (I recorded her with permission to share).

Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(