The chIna daiva dice like those used in maheshvara magic. Such prognostic magic ultimately had their roots in H tradition though the link has has been forgotten. The maheshvara magic and garuDa (pUrvasrotas)-tantra derived texts indicate the presence of shaiva (& kaumAra)
traditions in east Asia. While initial transmitted by tAthAgata-s like amoghavajra, they acquired a life of their own as cults. e.g. "jialouluo ji zhutian miyan jing" = scripture of Mantras of garuDa and gods seems to be 1 transmission of garuDa-tantra material by a Kashmirian
There were rites which used Avesha of individuals by ghosts, i.e. rudra-cheTaka-s & those that used dice. The cheTaka possessed a young individual who would then given a prognostication similar to the process of regular ghost dictation. While it is not explicitly mentioned in the
chIna text, the mantrin is believed to acquire the capacity to induce possession by the cheTaka only if he has mastered the mantra given at the end of the text called the "garuDa-dhAraNI". Despite its name it is aa rudra-mantra for activation of a bhUta known as chinna-kapAla
i.e. severed skull. The general form of the rudra mantra is similar to those found in the tantra-s like uDDAmareshvara which are aligned with the pashchima-srotas. But the name of the bhUta: Chinna-kapAla is rather unique and not found in a bhUta-aligned tantra extant in India

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with manasataramgini

manasataramgini Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blog_supplement

21 Nov
The equilateral triangle is not a common motif in most of H temple plans; however, it is extensively used in Kashmir. That it was prevalent in the Panjab before its destruction is clear from the shrine what is today the terrorist state. e.g. Mari Indus temple C.
The niche contained a sUrya image similar those in the widespread saura temples of western India.
A further worn out viShNu from the ruins of the mArtANDa temple: Note a unique aspect of Kashmirian temple architecture the use of the hexagonal and equilateral triangle symmetries. Quite unlike other H architectural traditions
Read 8 tweets
17 Nov
The divergence between education & accreditation/keys to the cartel has deepened enormously in the American academe. Many from India (myself included) sought that academe primarily for the latter function although for difference reasons. But in the least it offered educational
opportunities outside the classroom, such as through technology access, libraries, talks by experts & sometimes peers. However, that role is diminishing over the years& accreditation remains the most powerful thing going for universities despite their capture by navyonmAda. Real
education is something that both teacher & student enormously benefit from. I still think that is best achieved via the old model where there is a "lock and key" relationship between the two. There is where I think the H system of the teacher & student finding each other remains
Read 4 tweets
12 Nov
The pioneer of modern mahAbhArata studies, Sukthankar noted that the Mbh had probably been redacted by the bhR^igu clan. Here are the # occurrences of the bhR^igu/bhArgava & mArkaNDeya across the 18 parvan-s. bhR^igu & his descendants through paulomI are frequently mentioned from
from the R^igveda onward in the saMhitA-s. However, the 2nd line from bhR^igu's wife khyAti doesn't receive any notable mentions. However, in the mahAbhArata we find the emergence of a key member of this lineage mAkarNDeya. While missing the vedic saMhitA-s, tradition remembers
mArkaNDeya as an encyclopedic polymath: he composed the earliest of the paurANika narratives which form part of parvan 3; he's remembered as the composer of the first H work on painting; in H medicine he's remember as embryological theorist though his ideas were rendered false by
Read 5 tweets
11 Nov
1 of the major proponents of Macro-Altaic Robbeets who for some reason gives it a new name "Transeurasian" has rehashed some of their arguments with supposed support from genetics. Now, I used to believe in some form of Altaic. I'm of the non-Greenbergian
nature.com/articles/s4158…
opinion that to truly weigh in on some language phylogeny you need to have intimate knowledge of not just the linguistic tendencies but also the philology. Hence, I can hardly considered myself qualified to comment but some commonsense inferences from the general evolutionary
theory definitely applies, &I can comment on that basis. 1. The genetic relationships among the speakers of these language is not entirely surprising given that they come from a similar region. Yes, genetics can have bearing on linguistic relationships (like firming of I-Ir+Bl-Sl
Read 18 tweets
9 Nov
This is a topic I have commented a lot on, nevertheless: "same DNA" thing is what in America goes under the name racism. Race & religion are topics that evoke great passion& there is nothing surprising about it. But people need to have an objective look at it. Theory accurately
predicts that organisms will favor kin. In visual animals like humans this will involve looking for people who appear similar. They are likely to be kin -- nothing peculiar. Hence, there is an innate tendency to favor those who look like you against those who dont. However,
in biology the conflicts span many levels. As some culture had a proverb me against my brother; my brother & me against my cousin; my bro+cousins against tribe, tribe against other tribes etc. or something like that. It is conceivable that groups of people who look more similar
Read 11 tweets
8 Nov
The mentions of kubera in the 18 parvan-s of the mahAbhArata & the 7 kANDa-s of the rAmAyaNa. The normalization is by number of hemistiches (dala-s) which is reasonable given their metrical similarity with anuShTubh/triShTubh dominance. When normalized the rAmAyaNa mentions
kubera 1.96 times more frequently than the mahAbhArata. kubera is most frequently mentioned in parvan 3 of mahAbhArata which houses the rAmopAkhyAna, rich in allusion to the kaubera tradition. This supports the contention that the rAmAyaNa grew within a milieu where the kubera
cult was dominant, even if its main deity is to a degree presented "via supersession" to magnify the ikShvAku heroes. In the rAmopAkhyAna that is less so.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(