#SupremeCourt is hearing a public interest litigation regarding the operation of the 126-year-old Mullaperiyar Dam, a longstanding dispute between the states of Kerala and Tamil Nadu. #mullaperiyardam 
Sr Adv Jaideep Gupta: there is a new writ petition filed. Writ was seeking finalising of all these matters.
Sr Adv Shekhar Naphade: please take these matters on a non miscellaneous day
SC: We have part heard on the NMD days
Sr Adv Shekhar Naphade: please take these matters on a non miscellaneous day
SC: We have part heard on the NMD days
Gupta: the rule curve has to be settled now. we want the rule curve to be looked into. there is urgency in the sense that it needs to be heard
Naphade: we are also anxious for it to be heard.
Naphade: we are also anxious for it to be heard.
Gupta: let this matter be listed after the two part heard matters are over
Adv Wills Mathew: we say that Tamil Nadu should get water but security concerns of Kerala has to be taken care of.
SC: Once we issue notice and if this matter is incomplete then other problems will arise. we can dispose your plea with liberty to raise all points in the main one
SC: Once we issue notice and if this matter is incomplete then other problems will arise. we can dispose your plea with liberty to raise all points in the main one
VK Biju: i have issues with seepage,how much water is there and what should be the height of reservoir and what is the amount of agricultural land is there? no other plea has raised it
Bench: we will fix this issue after the two part heard matters (zakia jafri and PMLA issue). This will remain on list. #supremecourt #mullaperiyar
SC: In all fairness it is submitted that there is no immediate direction at this stage. we have no difficulty in agreeing to expeditious disposal of main proceeding. the matters to proceed after the two part heard matters conclude. Let this be listed on December 10 for directions
SC: List it for directions only. in the event the part heard matters is concluded early the registry may fix this matter for directions before December 10, 2021. as regards to a connected SLP, issues raised is overlapping with the main writ
SC: It is agreed that formal notice may not be issued in present SLP but petitioner be allowed to raise all contentions in main matter. respondents are at liberty to file affidavit in ref to any specific issue they propose to counter on facts
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
